AIJobFever
Find AI jobsAI Jobs in IndiaAI Career Insights
Home›AI Career Insights›AI Job Market›AI Job Market in the United States: Skills, Locations and Listing Patterns
AI Job Market

AI Job Market in the United States: Skills, Locations and Listing Patterns

Read a US-only catalogue snapshot of AI skills, locations, work modes and experience requirements, with practical guidance for choosing roles and clear limits on what listing counts can establish.

AJF

AIJobFever Research TeamEditorial research and AI career analysis

Published
17 Oct 2026
Reviewed
17 Oct 2026
Read
6 min
On this pageRead the country snapshot correctlyCompare locations and eligibility separatelyUnderstand role families before choosing a learning targetUse requirements to select evidence, not a keyword collectionRead employer counts and compensation responsiblyA focused weekly search reviewHistory and limitationsRelated preparation and jobs
Share this guide
inX@
QUICK ANSWER

What you need to know

Read a US-only catalogue snapshot of AI skills, locations, work modes and experience requirements, with practical guidance for choosing roles and clear limits on what listing counts can establish.

A United States AI job search benefits from a precise target: which systems you want to work on, the level of ownership you can demonstrate and the locations where employment is feasible. A research position, a production ML role and a customer-facing deployment role can all contain AI in the title while evaluating very different evidence.

This country report uses the site's US catalogue cohort and original job-search guidance. It is not a national vacancy census, employer headcount estimate or forecast. Tables describe the records represented at the stated capture, not every opening available to every candidate.

Read the country snapshot correctly

The US snapshot is selected from explicit country codes or recognized country names when codes are missing. Country is not guessed from a city: similarly named places exist in different countries. Contradictory metadata is excluded rather than assigned to whichever report has the closest-looking location.

Read the sample size, company-name count, UTC generation time and exclusion panel together. The catalogue creation-date span is not a span of employer posting dates. A newly discovered record can represent an older requisition, and a not-closed record still needs an availability check on the employer's page.

Skills mentioned in the same listing can overlap. Their shares therefore may sum above 100%, while the primary-specialization table assigns one stored classification per qualifying record. Differences in source coverage and classification can affect both views. Neither table establishes the relative value of a candidate or a guaranteed hiring outcome.

Compare locations and eligibility separately

Use the location table to find represented cities and metros, then check the individual office and attendance expectations. NYC and New York aliases group together; selected San Francisco and Bay Area aliases also group for discovery. Not every nearby city is automatically folded into a metro, and these groupings are not administrative or commuting-boundary claims.

Multiple-location records remain explicit rather than counted as a different vacancy in every named city. A US-remote label does not establish that employment from another country is allowed. Ask about the permitted employment location, office visits and time-zone coverage. Treat work authorization and sponsorship as separate questions requiring the employer's current terms and appropriate official information.

Do not infer a universal location pay premium from catalogue counts. The report does not measure housing costs, taxes, compensation bands or personal purchasing power. It helps identify descriptions to read; the decision to move or accept an offer needs additional evidence specific to your circumstances.

Understand role families before choosing a learning target

For an ML engineering role, investigate whether work centers on training, features, inference, evaluation or a production service. For an LLM or GenAI role, distinguish application integration from model adaptation and infrastructure. For RAG, inspect retrieval and evidence responsibilities rather than assuming the title simply means prompting.

Agent roles can include tool execution, permissions and recovery. Data engineering can include pipeline quality and source-change management. MLOps and platform roles may include release gates, monitoring and incident response. Research and vision roles can have different experimental or data-collection requirements. These are comparison questions, not claims that every US employer uses these definitions identically.

A stored specialization is a discovery aid. Read the complete responsibilities and identify the unit of ownership: a task, a component, an entire service or cross-team architecture. A title shared across employers does not prove a shared level or interview bar.

Use requirements to select evidence, not a keyword collection

Skill counts come from stored fields, normalized for case and selected aliases and counted once per listing. Requirements may still be missing, overly broad or differently worded. A rank is an observation of this sample, not a statistically established national demand ranking.

Take several suitable descriptions and mark each requirement as mandatory, preferred or contextual. Match important requirements to evidence you can explain: a reproducible experiment, a tested API, a retrieval evaluation, a permission boundary or a recovery exercise. Listing a framework name without describing a decision or failure case is weaker evidence than a smaller but well-understood implementation.

For entry-labelled jobs, examine support and expectations rather than relying on the label. For mid-level jobs, identify independent delivery duties. For senior roles, look for architecture, mentoring and operational scope. The report's experience groups use minimum stated years, not an inferred employer grade; unspecified data must not be treated as an entry-level requirement.

Read employer counts and compensation responsibly

The company table counts qualifying catalogue records, not employees hired. Case and whitespace variants merge, while related legal entities may remain separate. An employer can appear prominently because its postings are easier to discover or because the collection process reached it more often. Do not use the table to claim that the employer has the highest nationwide AI hiring volume.

Where a posting discloses pay, confirm the location, level, currency, period and whether the number is base or broader compensation. An advertised range is not actual earnings, a promised offer or a salary survey. The job-market report intentionally does not aggregate salary or turn absent pay into zero. Use the separate salary guide for a comparison method rather than mixing unlike figures into a market average.

A focused weekly search review

Keep a shortlist of distinct requisitions whose responsibilities and locations are feasible. Record the employer URL and the date you checked it. Compare required evidence with your actual work, then choose one gap that would materially improve your ability to perform the role. Do not fabricate experience to fit a numeric requirement.

Prepare a concise explanation of one system decision, one measured or clearly labelled synthetic result and one failure-recovery example. Use role-specific interview practice to strengthen reasoning rather than memorizing supposed employer questions. Track your applications separately: your response rate reflects your own sample and is not supplied by this report.

History and limitations

The first corrected-method request in each UTC month preserves a US-specific capture. Earlier mixed-country snapshots remain separate. These are first-capture records rather than month-end totals, so even future comparisons need a consistent interpretation and an account of changing collection coverage.

No hiring-growth or decline percentage is published. More records can reflect new sources, fewer closures or changed collection priorities rather than additional national vacancies. Use the report to investigate current role requirements and broaden a considered search, not to forecast employment or rank countries by career quality.

Related preparation and jobs

Browse AI jobs in the United States, practise ML evaluation, prepare with LLM Engineer interview questions and compare offer components with the US salary guide.

Also explore the country-scoped reports for India, Singapore and Australia. They are different catalogue cohorts, not directly comparable national market samples.

SEE THE MARKET

Find roles that match this guide.

Browse current, verified AI opportunities and review each employer’s requirements.

Explore AI jobs in United States →
HOW THIS WAS PREPARED

Methodology

AIJobFever first-party analysis

AI-assisted original educational interpretation with AIJobFever first-party catalogue observations. The embedded country-v2 report is generated from country-filtered, published, not-closed records with required fields and URL-based duplicate controls. Unknown or contradictory country metadata is excluded. City aliases and selected skill aliases are normalized; each skill counts once per listing. Counts, capture time, catalogue creation-date span and exclusions appear in the report, which is cached for up to five minutes in normal operation. Collection dates are not employer posting dates. Not-closed does not guarantee current employer availability. This is not a national survey, vacancy census, hiring forecast or salary benchmark. First corrected-method captures per country per UTC month are preserved separately from legacy mixed-country history. No growth or country attractiveness ranking is inferred. Practical recommendations are editorial guidance, not measured hiring outcomes.

Read our editorial and research policy →
AIJOBFEVER COUNTRY CATALOGUE SNAPSHOT

What United States AI listings show.

A country-filtered observation of published, not-closed catalogue records—not a national vacancy count or a hiring-growth estimate. Counts refresh through the site cache, normally within five minutes. Availability must be confirmed on the employer page.

IndiaUnited StatesSingaporeAustralia
Qualifying listings
864
Company names represented
516
Catalogue creation dates
7 Sept 2026–18 Oct 2026
Generated (UTC)
21 Oct 2026, 21:56

Qualification and exclusions

Published, not-closed records in this country with title, company, location, specialization and description; explicit non-AI labels excluded; deduplicated by stored normalized employer URL or URL normalization fallback. Unknown or contradictory country metadata is not inferred from city names.

  • 864 country records reviewed
  • 0 incomplete records excluded
  • 0 duplicate URLs excluded
  • 0 explicitly non-AI records excluded
  • 797 country records closed or unpublished before review
  • 2,469 live records outside this country scope
  • 3 live records with unknown or contradictory country metadata across the catalogue

Skills mentioned

Each normalized skill counts at most once per listing. Skills overlap, so their shares can sum above 100%.

RankSegmentListingsShare of sample
1Python46954.3%
2Large Language Models (LLMs)41648.1%
3Machine Learning33338.5%
4AI agents29634.3%
5Generative AI28132.5%
6RAG24528.4%
7Prompt engineering23527.2%
8AWS18721.6%
9SQL14917.2%
10Model Evaluation14416.7%
11CI/CD14016.2%
12PyTorch13715.9%

Locations represented

Country-specific aliases are grouped. Multiple, unknown and unclassified locations remain explicit, not guessed.

RankSegmentListingsShare of sample
1New York City14817.1%
2Multiple locations10211.8%
3Chicago698%
4Boston627.2%
5Atlanta606.9%
6No single city specified212.4%
7San Francisco Bay Area212.4%
8Santa Clara202.3%
9Raleigh182.1%
10Cambridge172%

AI specializations

The stored primary discipline of each qualifying catalogue record.

RankSegmentListingsShare of sample
1AI Agents21424.8%
2AI Product11213%
3Generative AI11112.8%
4Machine Learning9010.4%
5Data Science566.5%
6MLOps445.1%
7Other AI Specialization414.7%
8Large Language Models (LLMs)293.4%
9AI Infrastructure & GPU Computing283.2%
10AI Research283.2%

Companies represented

Names with the most qualifying listings in this catalogue, not the largest employers or confirmed hires.

RankSegmentListingsShare of sample
1NVIDIA222.5%
2Lenovo202.3%
3Capgemini192.2%
4State Street182.1%
5Distyl AI151.7%
6The Home Depot111.3%
7AIG PC Global Services, Inc.70.8%
8Google70.8%
9Rexzone70.8%
10The Mitre Corporation70.8%

Work modes

Stored remote, hybrid and on-site labels; remote does not establish permission to work from any country.

RankSegmentListingsShare of sample
1On-site42549.2%
2Hybrid33739%
3Remote10211.8%

Experience requirements

Bands use the stated minimum years or an explicit entry label, not inferred seniority. Unrecognized wording is unspecified.

RankSegmentListingsShare of sample
15+ years43049.8%
2Not specified22025.5%
33–4 years12514.5%
41–2 years789%
5Fresher / entry-level111.3%

Tables show leading segments, not necessarily every value. Links open country-scoped discovery filters; search normalization and later catalogue updates can make their totals differ from this capture.

Known limitations

  • This is the AIJobFever United States catalogue cohort, not national employment, all vacancies or confirmed employer hiring volume.
  • Collection dates are catalogue creation dates of included records, not employer posting dates. Newly collected does not mean newly posted.
  • Not-closed is a stored catalogue state, not a guarantee of present availability. Confirm on the employer page.
  • Collection priorities, accessible sources and closure checks affect counts; changes cannot by themselves establish hiring growth.
  • Curated country-specific city aliases merge (including Bangalore/Bengaluru); multi-location and unknown records remain explicit. This is a search grouping, not an administrative boundary definition.
  • Skills count once per listing after case and selected alias normalization; skill shares can sum above 100%. Unmapped wording can remain separate.
  • Experience bands use the stated numeric lower bound or explicit entry label. Unknown wording remains unspecified; entry labels do not guarantee candidate eligibility.
  • Company names merge case and whitespace only; related legal entities can remain separate. Listing counts are not employer headcounts.
  • No salary averages, job-growth percentages or country attractiveness rankings are inferred.
  • History begins with the first corrected-method capture per country per UTC month, not month-end totals. Legacy mixed-country snapshots are retained separately and not compared.

Preserved country snapshots

The first corrected-method report request per country per UTC month is saved once. These are first-capture observations, not month-end totals. Earlier mixed-country history is retained separately. No growth comparison is made.

MonthQualifying listingsCaptured (UTC)
2026-1089217 Oct 2026, 12:55
LIVE OPPORTUNITIES

Jobs related to this insight.

851 matching open roles in the current catalogue.

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

Decision Intelligence Lead

Santa Clara, United States · On-site

8 yearsView job →
Acosta Group

Senior AI Engineer / Agent Development Lead

Oak Brook, United States · On-site

7 yearsView job →
Solstice Advanced Materials

Sr AI Manager

Morris Plains, United States · On-site

8 yearsView job →
Jobber

Principal Engineer (AI, Office of the CEO)

Boston, United States · Hybrid

Not specifiedView job →
OpenAI Foundation

AI Deployment Engineer

San Francisco, United States · Hybrid

5 yearsView job →
Thomson Reuters

Lead AI Forward Engineer

Eagan; Frisco, United States of America · Hybrid

6 yearsView job →
Companies represented:NVIDIA (22)Capgemini (19)Lenovo (19)State Street (18)Distyl AI (15)The Home Depot (11)
KEEP LEARNING

Related career insights.

Salary Insights

AI Salaries in the United States: Base Pay, Equity and Offer Comparisons

Learn how to compare US AI offers across ten roles, location-specific pay bands, bonuses and equity, with worked examples and a transparent catalogue-coverage snapshot.

Read insight →
Interview Preparation

LLM Engineer Interview Questions: 10 Detailed Answers and Scenarios

Prepare for LLM Engineer interviews with ten explained questions on tokens, runtime memory, latency, quantization, fine-tuning, structured output and hardware-aware evaluation.

Read insight →
AI Skills

Machine Learning Evaluation: Baselines, Leakage and Error Analysis in Practice

Learn to design honest ML evaluations, calculate threshold metrics, investigate leakage and compare error slices through a worked example, exercises and a reproducible evaluation project.

Read insight →
AIJobFever

Practical, source-backed guidance for building an AI career.

Find AI jobsIndia AI jobsUSA AI jobsAI jobs for freshersRemote AI jobsEditorial policyGive FeedbackAboutPrivacy