New opportunity

AI Solutions Engineer

Veralto Global · Wood Dale, United States of America

About this role

Videojet, a Veralto company, is building an AI Solutions team focused on measurable business outcomes. The AI Solutions Engineer will turn business problems into production-ready solutions that improve customer experiences, efficiency and enterprise growth. The role is based in Wood Dale, Illinois, on a hybrid schedule of 40 hours per week.

Responsibilities

  • Partner with business leaders, product managers, cloud and data teams, and technology partners to design, build, integrate, deploy and support AI solutions.
  • Develop enterprise AI services, retrieval systems for complex enterprise data, AI agents and multi-step workflows. Integrate them with CRM, knowledge, data and operational platforms.
  • Evaluate build, buy and hybrid approaches; deploy cloud infrastructure using Infrastructure as Code.
  • Establish monitoring, evaluation, governance and release practices. Support reliable production operations and improve solution quality, cost efficiency and business adoption.

Requirements

  • 5+ years of software, cloud, platform or data engineering experience, plus applied AI experience delivering production solutions.
  • Strong Python skills; Azure and/or AWS experience; enterprise API and integration experience; and experience with AI workflows, orchestration frameworks and retrieval systems.
  • Ability to translate business challenges into technical solutions.

Compensation and benefits: The posted compensation range is $100,000–$140,000 USD per year, with bonus eligibility. Eligible employees receive paid time off, medical, dental and vision insurance, and a 401(k).

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

PythonAzureAWSAI agentsRetrieval systemsAI workflow orchestrationEnterprise APIsSystems integrationInfrastructure as CodeCloud infrastructureAI evaluationMonitoringAI governanceProduction operationsBusiness requirements translation

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Business outcomes and adoption

    The posting emphasizes translating business problems into production AI solutions that users adopt, with measurable effects on customer experience, efficiency or growth. Prepare to explain how you would define a business outcome with stakeholders and measure adoption after release.

  • Enterprise retrieval and AI workflows

    The role builds retrieval systems for complex enterprise data, AI agents and multi-step workflows. Prepare to discuss design choices and how you would evaluate whether a workflow produces useful, accurate results.

  • Secure platform integration

    The engineer integrates AI with CRM, knowledge, data and operational platforms; secure, governed integrations are a stated success measure. Prepare an architecture-level explanation of API boundaries, data access and governance.

  • Production quality and operations

    The posting calls for monitoring, evaluation, release practices, reliability and continuous improvement in quality and cost efficiency. Prepare to describe how you would evaluate a change, release it and detect problems in production.

  • Pragmatic solution selection and deployment

    The role evaluates build, buy and hybrid approaches and deploys cloud infrastructure using Infrastructure as Code. Prepare a decision framework covering fit, integration effort, operational ownership and cost.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing data access with governance

    Likely preparation challenge, not a confirmed employer problem: retrieval across enterprise systems may improve usefulness while complicating access control and data handling. Prepare to explain how you would test retrieval quality without exposing information to the wrong users.

  • Keeping multi-step AI behavior reliable

    Likely preparation challenge: agents can handle more complex work, but added steps create more failure points and make results harder to evaluate. Prepare to discuss when a simpler workflow is preferable and how you would measure failures before release.

  • Moving beyond a successful demo

    Likely preparation challenge: an AI solution may look promising in testing yet fail to earn business adoption or justify its operating cost. Prepare to connect a proposed use case to user feedback, measurable outcomes and a plan for improving quality and cost after deployment.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you turn a business problem into a production-ready AI solution?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would clarify the user need, define a measurable outcome, and decide whether AI is appropriate. Cover a path from initial design through deployment, support, and adoption; the posting emphasizes business outcomes rather than experimentation alone.

How would you design retrieval over complex enterprise data?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss how you would prepare and organize source data, retrieve relevant information, and evaluate whether the results support useful answers. Address trade-offs among relevance, freshness, access controls, and operating cost.

How would you structure a Python-based enterprise AI service?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe API boundaries, validation, error handling, and testing for a service that other enterprise systems can use. Explain how you would make the service maintainable and observable in production.

How would you integrate an AI capability with CRM, knowledge, data, and operational platforms?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Walk through interface contracts, data flow, permissions, and failure handling across systems. Explain how you would protect enterprise data while keeping integrations reliable and useful.

When would you use an AI agent or multi-step workflow instead of a simpler service?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare the flexibility of agents with the predictability of a defined workflow. Discuss orchestration, step-level checks, failure recovery, and how you would limit unnecessary complexity.

How would you deploy an AI solution on Azure or AWS using Infrastructure as Code?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe how you would define and review infrastructure changes, manage environments and configuration, and deploy reproducibly. Discuss reliability, security, and cost trade-offs without assuming a particular cloud service or IaC tool.

How would you evaluate an AI solution before release?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Propose evaluation cases tied to the business use case, including quality and failure cases, and explain how you would compare changes. Describe release criteria and how you would detect a regression after deployment.

How would you troubleshoot a production AI workflow that has become less reliable?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain what you would monitor across inputs, retrieval, workflow steps, integrations, latency, and errors to isolate the cause. Cover mitigation, verification, and how findings would feed continuous improvement.

How would you choose between building, buying, and combining AI capabilities?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare fit to the business problem, integration effort, governance, reliability, ongoing ownership, and cost. Explain how you would test assumptions before committing to an approach.

What governance controls would you establish for an enterprise AI release?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss access to data and integrations, ownership, evaluation evidence, and review of changes. Explain how controls can support secure operation without preventing useful business adoption.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you aligned business and technical stakeholders on a solution.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use a real situation involving differing needs, explain how you clarified the problem and coordinated decisions, and state the result. Connect your example to the role’s collaboration with business leaders, product managers, and cloud or data teams.

Tell me about a time you improved adoption of a technical solution.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the users’ initial needs or obstacles, what you changed or communicated, and the observed result. If available, distinguish usage evidence from broader business impact.

Tell me about a time you supported a production issue.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Set out the impact, your actions to diagnose and stabilize the system, and the result. Include what changed afterward to improve reliability or monitoring, if applicable.

Tell me about a time you made a build-versus-buy trade-off.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain the situation, the options and criteria you considered, your contribution to the decision, and the outcome. Be clear about uncertainty or trade-offs that remained.

Tell me about a time you introduced an evaluation, governance, or release practice.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the gap you identified, how you worked with others to change the practice, and its result. If you have no directly comparable example, choose a real engineering quality practice and explain the limits of the comparison.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Business outcomes and solution choices

    The posting emphasizes translating business problems into measurable outcomes and evaluating build, buy, and hybrid approaches. Suggested exercise: outline one business problem, define an adoption and outcome measure, then compare the three approaches on integration, reliability, and cost.

  • Retrieval over enterprise data

    The role calls for retrieval systems that work with complex enterprise data. Suggested exercise: sketch how a retrieval service would handle different data sources, access boundaries, and relevance checks; explain the trade-offs.

  • Agents and workflow design

    The posting specifies AI agents, multi-step workflows, and orchestration frameworks. Suggested exercise: diagram a multi-step workflow, including where it calls an enterprise system, handles a failed step, and hands control back to a user.

  • Enterprise integration and governance

    Secure, governed integrations with CRM, knowledge, data, and operational platforms are stated goals. Suggested exercise: review an integration design for data access, API failure handling, and governance decisions; the particular controls are preparation suggestions, not specified requirements.

  • Production evaluation and release decisions

    The role includes monitoring, evaluation, release practices, reliability, and improvements in quality and cost efficiency. Suggested exercise: define what evidence would justify releasing a workflow and what signals would prompt a rollback or revision.

Skills to revise

  • Python AI service implementation

    Strong Python development and production AI delivery are explicit requirements. Suggested exercise: implement a small Python service that accepts a request, runs an AI workflow, returns a structured response, and handles invalid inputs and failures.

  • Retrieval implementation and testing

    Building retrieval systems is an explicit responsibility. Suggested exercise: construct a small retrieval workflow over sample enterprise-style documents and test whether its results remain relevant when questions are rephrased.

  • Multi-step workflow orchestration

    The posting asks for agents, multi-step workflows, and orchestration experience. Suggested exercise: build a short workflow with a retrieval step, an API step, and a failure path; trace each step to diagnose an incorrect result.

  • Enterprise API integration

    Enterprise APIs and integration experience are explicit requirements. Suggested exercise: connect a Python workflow to a simulated CRM or knowledge-platform API and test authentication handling, timeouts, and duplicate requests; these test cases are preparation suggestions.

  • Cloud deployment and operational checks

    The role specifies Azure and/or AWS, Infrastructure as Code, monitoring, and production support. Suggested exercise: draft an Infrastructure as Code deployment for a small service on the cloud platform you know, then specify a health check and monitoring signals; the posting names no particular service or IaC tool.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Frame a business problem

    Draft a one-page example showing how you would translate a business challenge into an AI solution, with a proposed measure of customer experience, efficiency, or growth. The posting emphasizes measurable outcomes and business-user adoption.

  • Prepare a production project walkthrough

    If you have a relevant example, outline your contribution from requirements through deployment and support. Bring concrete evidence of Python development, applied AI, Azure and/or AWS, enterprise APIs, and the engineering experience requested in the posting.

  • Sketch an enterprise AI design

    Prepare a diagram for retrieval over complex enterprise data and an agent or multi-step workflow. Explain how it could connect to CRM, knowledge, data, or operational platforms, and identify assumptions rather than presenting the design as Videojet’s architecture.

  • Compare delivery approaches

    Make a short build-versus-buy-versus-hybrid decision table for your proposed solution, covering integration, governance, reliability, and cost. Evaluating these approaches is an advertised responsibility.

  • Explain the path to deployment

    Outline how you would deploy cloud infrastructure with Infrastructure as Code and handle secure enterprise integrations. Be ready to describe the boundaries between the AI service, connected platforms, and production support.

  • Plan evaluation and operations

    Draft a compact scorecard for solution quality, reliability, cost efficiency, and adoption, plus a proposed monitoring and release checklist. The posting identifies evaluation, governance, release practices, and continuous improvement as measures of success.

  • Bring targeted questions

    Ask which business outcomes the new AI Solutions team will prioritize, what enterprise data and platforms are in scope, and how business leaders, product, cloud, and data teams will share decisions and production support.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Oct 1, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: Nov 4, 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in United States of America. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…