New opportunity

Principal Product Manager, AI

Humana · New York, United States of America

About this role

Humana seeks a hands-on Principal Product Manager, AI to set the strategy and drive delivery of a portfolio of enterprise AI products. The role spans business discovery, prototyping, production launches and delivery through Humana’s AI governance process.

Responsibilities

  • Define a multi-year portfolio vision and roadmap, prioritize opportunities as business needs and models change, and work with enterprise leaders to turn operational challenges into sequenced AI use cases with clear business cases.
  • Build prototypes and demos using tools such as Claude Code, Cursor and OpenAI Codex. Translate validated ideas into user stories, acceptance criteria, edge cases and success metrics; partner with design on usable experiences and with engineering on feasibility and architecture.
  • Lead delivery from prototype through launch and iteration. Establish reusable context-engineering, AI-harness and solution patterns. Define evaluation standards using golden sets, error budgets, offline and production evaluations, and metrics including precision, recall, task success and hallucination rate; use validated LLM-as-judge methods where appropriate.
  • Lead cross-functional teams through influence, communicate roadmaps, ROI and evaluation results to executives, mentor product managers, and develop AI playbooks. Own documentation, scorecards and reviews for enterprise AI governance, incorporating safety, fairness, privacy and compliance.

Required qualifications

10+ years of product or related experience, including shipping AI/ML or generative AI products to production; candidates with fewer years may be considered if they have a strong engineering background and AI fluency. Requires portfolio-level strategic and delivery impact, hands-on AI prototyping, experience building evaluations and setting standards, systems thinking, executive-level business cases and communication, and working knowledge of LLMs, agents, RAG, prompt and harness engineering, and their trade-offs.

Preferred qualifications

12+ years of product experience or equivalent AI-native building depth in a large enterprise; healthcare, insurance or other regulated-industry experience; hands-on work with agent frameworks, GraphRAG, knowledge graphs and reusable skills or plugins; experience establishing AI product categories or organizational standards; familiarity with responsible AI and sensitive-data compliance; and a computer science or engineering degree or equivalent experience.

This full-time, 40-hour-per-week role follows a hybrid schedule of three office days weekly. Candidates must live within, or be willing to relocate to, commuting distance of the New York, NY office. Estimated starting base pay is $201,600–$277,200 annually, with eligibility for a performance-based bonus. Benefits include medical, dental and vision coverage, a 401(k), paid time off and leave, disability coverage and life insurance.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

AI product managementProduct strategyPortfolio managementProduct roadmappingBusiness case developmentPrototypingClaude CodeCursorOpenAI CodexUser storiesAcceptance criteriaAI evaluationGolden setsPrecision and recallLLM-as-judgeSolution architectureContext engineeringPrompt engineeringAI agentsLarge language modelsRAGFine-tuningGraphRAGKnowledge graphsResponsible AIBias mitigationStakeholder managementExecutive communicationMentoring

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Shape the AI portfolio

    The role defines a multi-year vision and roadmap, maps operations with business leaders, and sequences ambiguous use cases by business case. Prepare to explain how you would compare opportunities and communicate investment choices to executives.

  • Prove ideas hands-on

    Humana expects working prototypes and demos using agentic coding tools before committing a full team. Validated ideas must become user stories, acceptance criteria, edge cases, success metrics, and usable experiences.

  • Deliver reusable production patterns

    The role drives products from prototype through launch and iteration, partners with engineering on feasibility, and owns reusable context-engineering and AI-harness components rather than only one-off solutions.

  • Set evaluation standards

    The posting calls for golden sets, error budgets, offline and production evaluations, and metrics such as precision, recall, task success, and hallucination rate. Results inform launch decisions and leadership readouts.

  • Lead governed adoption

    The role owns documentation, scorecards, and stage-gate reviews for AI governance, with safety, fairness, privacy, and compliance built in. It also leads across functions without direct authority, mentors product managers, and develops playbooks.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Keep a long-term roadmap adaptable

    Likely trade-off: multi-year commitments must coexist with changing business needs and model capabilities. Prepare a prioritization approach that states assumptions, compares business cases, and identifies when evidence would trigger resequencing.

  • Turn a compelling demo into a viable launch

    Likely difficulty: a fast prototype may not establish usability, feasible architecture, or acceptable latency, cost, and hallucination risk at production scale. Prepare to describe decision gates from prototype to scoped requirements, engineering validation, launch, and iteration.

  • Balance launch pace with evidence and governance

    Likely trade-off: teams need momentum while evaluations and responsible-AI stage gates require defensible evidence. Prepare an example framework linking ground truth, error budgets, production monitoring, and safety or privacy findings to a launch decision.

  • Standardize without stalling teams

    Likely difficulty: shared harness patterns, evaluation standards, and playbooks must work across distinct products and stakeholders the role does not directly manage. Prepare to explain how you would establish a reusable baseline, allow justified exceptions, and gain adoption through clear technical and business reasoning.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you build and revise a multi-year roadmap for a portfolio of AI products?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain how you would set a north star, compare opportunities across product areas, and sequence investment. Address how changes in business needs or model capabilities would alter the roadmap.

How would you turn an ambiguous operational problem into a prioritized AI use case?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Walk through mapping the workflow with business leaders, identifying where AI could help, and testing whether the use case has a credible business case. Explain what evidence would justify pursuing it ahead of competing opportunities.

What would you build in a hands-on AI prototype before committing a full team?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe a small working demo that tests both feasibility and user value, using an agentic coding tool if relevant. Distinguish what the prototype can establish from what still needs engineering and production validation.

How would you translate a validated AI prototype into buildable product requirements?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Cover user stories, acceptance criteria, edge cases, and measurable success criteria. Explain how you would work with design on usability and engineering on feasibility.

When would you choose RAG rather than fine-tuning for an enterprise AI use case?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Compare the approaches against the need for current information and the desired model behavior. Discuss the posting’s stated trade-offs: context windows, latency, cost, and hallucination risk.

How would you design reusable context-engineering and AI-harness patterns across products?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain what context and reusable skills a solution needs, and where a shared pattern helps rather than constrains individual products. Describe how you would partner with engineering on architectural feasibility and evaluate the pattern’s effect on quality.

How would you construct a golden set and select metrics for an AI product evaluation?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe how to establish ground truth and include representative cases and failures. Explain when precision, recall, task success, or hallucination rate would inform a product decision.

How would you use offline and production evaluations to make a launch decision?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain how you would set an error budget, compare offline results with observed production behavior, and turn findings into a launch or iteration recommendation. If using LLM-as-judge, describe how you would validate it before relying on its scores.

How would you prepare an AI product for governance review?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Discuss product documentation, scorecards, and evidence for stage-gate reviews, including safety, fairness, privacy, and compliance. Explain how identified risks would affect scope or a launch decision without assuming a particular approval outcome.

How would you move an AI product from demo to production when its model or constraints change?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain how you would sequence work, revisit scope and technical trade-offs with engineering, and preserve measurable value through launch and iteration. Identify what you would re-evaluate rather than assuming the prototype’s results will hold in production.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you aligned teams you did not directly manage around a product decision.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Use a real situation involving differing business, design, data science, or engineering views. State your actions to build agreement and the resulting decision or outcome.

Describe a time you made a portfolio-level decision with incomplete information.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Set out the ambiguity and competing opportunities, then explain the principles and evidence you used to prioritize. Close with the result and what you changed as more information emerged.

Tell me about a time you communicated a technical evaluation or business case to executives.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain the decision at stake, how you conveyed ROI, uncertainty, and quality results, and what action followed. Use a real example rather than claiming a particular executive response.

Describe a time you resolved a safety, privacy, or fairness concern during product delivery.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Give the situation, your actions with relevant partners, and the effect on the product or decision. Be clear about the evidence available and any risk that remained.

Tell me about a time you helped other product managers adopt a better way of building AI products.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe the initial gap, how you mentored colleagues or developed a reusable standard or playbook, and the observed result. Distinguish your own contribution from the team’s work.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Portfolio strategy under uncertainty

    The posting calls for a multi-year AI portfolio vision, first-principles prioritization and a roadmap that adapts as business needs and models change. To revise, compare three hypothetical use cases by value, feasibility and risk, then explain how a model improvement would change their sequence.

  • LLM solution trade-offs

    Required knowledge includes LLMs, agents, RAG, prompt and harness engineering, plus context-window, latency, cost, hallucination and RAG-versus-fine-tuning trade-offs. To revise, make a decision table for a hypothetical enterprise task and defend the simplest viable approach.

  • Evaluation and launch decisions

    The role sets standards for golden sets, error budgets, offline and production evaluations, and metrics such as precision, recall, task success and hallucination rate. To revise, choose metrics for two different failure modes and state what result would block launch; include when an LLM-as-judge would need validation.

  • Reusable AI architecture

    The posting emphasizes systems thinking, engineering partnership, and reusable context-engineering, skill-creation and AI-harness patterns. To revise, sketch a high-level pattern shared by two hypothetical products and identify which components should remain product-specific.

  • Responsible AI and governed delivery

    Humana says shipped solutions must clear its AI governance stage gates, with safety, fairness, privacy and compliance built in. To revise, map those four concerns to evidence you would seek before a stage-gate review; do not assume the contents of Humana's internal standards.

  • Influence at principal level

    The role leads cross-functional teams without direct authority, influences VP-level organizations and mentors senior and lead product managers. To revise, outline how you would resolve a hypothetical disagreement between business value, usability, technical feasibility and evaluation results.

Skills to revise

  • Build a sequenced business case

    The posting asks for end-to-end operational discovery, AI use-case selection, ROI models and executive roadmaps. As practice, draft a one-page, explicitly hypothetical portfolio proposal with assumptions, expected value, dependencies and reasons for sequencing.

  • Prototype and explain technical choices

    Working demos using agentic coding tools such as Claude Code, Cursor or OpenAI Codex are explicitly part of the role. As practice, use one named tool to prototype a small non-sensitive task, then record what you would change about the model's behavior and why.

  • Construct and interpret an evaluation

    The posting requires hands-on golden sets, ground truth, offline and live evaluations, and standards other teams can adopt. As practice, create a small labeled test set, score sample outputs for precision and recall, inspect failures, and write a launch recommendation tied to an error budget.

  • Turn validation into buildable scope

    The role translates validated use cases into user stories, acceptance criteria, edge cases and success metrics while partnering with design and engineering. As practice, write those artifacts for one hypothetical prototype and identify a usability and an architecture question for the respective partners.

  • Present a governed launch decision

    The posting calls for product documentation, scorecards, stage-gate reviews and clear executive communication of ROI and evaluation results. As practice, prepare a brief hypothetical leadership readout covering value, test results, safety and privacy concerns, unresolved risks, and a launch-or-iterate recommendation.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Draft a portfolio strategy brief

    Using an illustrative enterprise problem, map the workflow, propose several AI use cases, and sequence them on a multi-year roadmap. State assumptions, business-case estimates, and what would change your priorities.

  • Rehearse a production-product walkthrough

    If you have a relevant AI/ML launch, prepare a concise account of your role from discovery and prototype through production and iteration, including scope trade-offs, measured outcomes, and executive decisions.

  • Prepare a hands-on prototype demonstration

    Show a prototype you built, or outline one you could build, using non-sensitive data. Explain its feasibility test and your choices around model behavior, context, agents, RAG versus fine-tuning, latency, cost, and hallucination risk.

  • Write a buildable design exercise

    For the illustrative use case, produce user stories, acceptance criteria, edge cases, success metrics, and a simple user flow. Note what you would validate with design and engineering before committing to delivery.

  • Create an evaluation and launch scorecard

    Specify a golden set and ground truth, an error budget, offline and production evaluations, and relevant precision, recall, task-success, and hallucination measures. Show how results would inform a launch decision; use LLM-as-judge only with a validation plan.

  • Map a governed delivery path

    Draft a sample product-documentation and review checklist covering safety, fairness, privacy, and compliance. The posting names AIRB, LRC, and the Responsible AI Council; prepare to ask how their stage gates work rather than assuming their criteria.

  • Collect evidence of influence and reuse

    If available, select examples of leading across disciplines without direct authority, communicating ROI or evaluation results to executives, mentoring product managers, and establishing reusable AI patterns or playbooks. Identify the decision and outcome for each.

  • Prepare questions for Humana

    Ask how portfolio priorities are set, who owns evaluation thresholds and launch decisions, how governance reviews affect delivery, and which context-engineering or harness patterns the team hopes to reuse.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: Nov 4, 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in United States of America. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…