Technical practice
How would you evaluate an agent before shipping it for investment-management users?
What to coverThe posting calls for rigorous evaluation of agents involved in analyzing, managing, and moving substantial assets. Suggested preparation: explain how you would define representative tasks, measure correctness and failure modes, and set release criteria that go beyond an impressive demo.
What would you observe in a production agent to diagnose a poor result?
What to coverThe role explicitly includes agent observability. Suggested preparation: discuss tracing decisions and workflow steps, recording useful inputs and outputs, and balancing diagnostic detail against the sensitivity of financial information.
When would you use multiple agents rather than a simpler workflow?
What to coverMulti-agent orchestration is named in the posting. Suggested preparation: explain how you would divide responsibilities, coordinate handoffs, and judge whether added complexity improves reliability or task performance.
How would you make a graph-based agent workflow durable?
What to coverThe posting names durable graph-based workflow execution. Suggested preparation: cover persisted state, retries, recovery after interruption, and how to prevent a repeated step from producing an unintended action.
How would you decide what context an agent receives?
What to coverContext engineering is a stated part of the role. Suggested preparation: discuss relevance, freshness, source quality, and context limits, including how you would check whether a context change improves outcomes.
What distributed-systems failures matter in agent orchestration?
What to coverExperience with distributed systems is listed alongside reliable orchestration. Suggested preparation: reason through timeouts, partial failures, duplicate execution, and consistency, distinguishing safe recovery from simply retrying everything.
When is a prompt change insufficient to fix an agent failure?
What to coverThe role spans prompt-level craft and system-level architecture. Suggested preparation: compare prompt changes with changes to context, workflow design, or evaluation, and explain how evidence would guide the choice.
How would you design a first version of an agent product around a real user problem?
What to coverThe role is to architect and ship AI products from 0 to 1 for large financial institutions. Suggested preparation: describe how you would narrow the use case, define useful behavior, and design an initial architecture that can be evaluated and improved.
How would you investigate an intermittent failure across an agent workflow?
What to coverThe posting emphasizes evaluation, observability, and reliable orchestration. Suggested preparation: walk through isolating the failing step, reproducing the issue, distinguishing model behavior from execution faults, and verifying the fix.
How would you choose among Go, Python, and TypeScript for part of an agent system?
What to coverThe posting asks for familiarity with Go, Python, or TypeScript, without prescribing a stack. Suggested preparation: compare fit with the surrounding system, development speed, and operational needs rather than claiming one language is required.
Behavioural practice
Tell me about a time you owned an ambiguous product problem from idea to delivery.
What to coverThe posting describes a highly autonomous, 0-to-1 role with ownership of outcomes. Suggested preparation: use a real situation, the decisions and actions you personally took, and the result, including what changed as you learned more.
Tell me about a time customer input changed your technical plan.
What to coverThe role involves working closely with customers to solve real user problems. Suggested preparation: describe the customer's need, how you tested your initial assumptions, what you changed, and the resulting impact.
Tell me about a time you aligned people across engineering, product, and research work.
What to coverThe posting expects work spanning research, engineering, and product in collaboration with leadership and engineering. Suggested preparation: give a real example of differing priorities, how you communicated a decision, and what the team achieved.
Tell me about a time you raised a quality concern before shipping.
What to coverThe posting stresses rigorous evaluation and products that are more than demos. Suggested preparation: explain the risk you identified, the evidence and action you brought forward, and the outcome without overstating certainty.
Tell me about a time you disagreed constructively under pressure.
What to coverThe posting describes an intense pace and explicitly rejects poor collaboration. Suggested preparation: outline the disagreement, how you handled it respectfully, and the decision or working relationship that resulted.