New opportunity

Senior Product Manager - AI

GE Vernova · Cambridge; Niskayuna, United States

About this role

The Senior Product Manager - AI develops and executes AI-powered products that improve business processes and user experiences across GE Vernova. Working with the AI Portfolio Manager, the role identifies and prioritizes multiple products and measures their value through the Safety, Quality, Delivery, and Cost (SQDC) framework.

Responsibilities

  • Work with business, engineering, research, data science, IT, and design teams to shape and execute product roadmaps aligned with strategic objectives.
  • Coordinate AI applications across the business, address user needs, and maintain technical rigor while establishing ways to verify success and identify risks.
  • Use analytics, metrics, and KPIs to assess product performance and the impact of AI initiatives. Monitor products after launch, gather feedback, and improve features.
  • Evaluate AI products from third-party software suppliers and determine their technology fit.

Required: A bachelor's degree in Mathematics, Computer Science, Engineering, or a related field and at least 7 years of relevant professional experience. Candidates must be willing to work out of an office in Niskayuna, New York, or Cambridge, Massachusetts, and must be legally authorized to work in the United States.

Preferred

Business acumen; leadership of cross-functional teams and projects; communication and presentation skills for diverse stakeholders, occasionally including C-suite executives; experience building and deploying AI applications; analytical problem-solving; and technical proficiency with a data-driven mindset.

For Cambridge-based employees, a required three-month hybrid onboarding residency takes place at the GE Vernova Advanced Research Center in Niskayuna. Travel, housing, and a living stipend are provided for that residency. Relocation assistance is available. The stated U.S. pay range is $113,200–$188,800, with a 110%, 120%, or 130% geographic salary differential in certain areas and eligibility for a discretionary annual bonus. Benefits include health coverage, retirement contributions, tuition assistance, parental leave, 12 paid holidays, and permissive time off.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

AI product managementProduct roadmappingAI application developmentData analyticsKPI developmentUser experienceCross-functional collaborationStakeholder managementBusiness strategyAI application deploymentRisk assessmentVendor evaluationCommunicationPresentation

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Prioritize AI products by SQDC value

    Work with the AI Portfolio Manager to identify and prioritize several AI products, judging their impact through Safety, Quality, Delivery, and Cost.

  • Shape and execute cross-functional roadmaps

    Provide roadmap input and coordinate business, engineering, research, data science, IT, and design work around strategic objectives.

  • Deliver usable, technically rigorous AI

    Address user needs while working with technical teams to build robust solutions, verify success, and identify risks.

  • Measure and improve products after launch

    Define and monitor metrics and KPIs, gather user feedback, and iterate on features to improve value delivery.

  • Assess third-party AI products

    Oversee the introduction of AI products from software suppliers and determine their technology fit.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing competing measures of value

    Likely preparation hypothesis: An AI product could improve delivery or cost without improving safety or quality. Prepare a way to compare product options against all four SQDC dimensions and explain prioritization trade-offs; the posting does not specify how those trade-offs are resolved.

  • Reconciling user needs with AI verification

    Likely preparation hypothesis: A feature users want may be difficult to verify or carry technical risks. Prepare an example of defining user value, agreeing on success checks with technical partners, and adjusting scope when evidence falls short.

  • Coordinating decisions across businesses

    Likely preparation hypothesis: Different business groups and technical teams may favor different roadmap outcomes. Prepare to explain how you would surface those differences, make a recommendation tied to strategic objectives, and communicate it to varied stakeholders.

  • Choosing when a supplier product fits

    Likely preparation hypothesis: A third-party AI product may promise faster delivery but fit user needs or technical requirements poorly. Prepare a comparison approach covering expected value, technical fit, verification, and risks without assuming GE Vernova uses a particular procurement process.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you prioritize several proposed AI products using the SQDC framework?

What to coverThe posting says this role helps identify and prioritize multiple products based on Safety, Quality, Delivery, and Cost. Suggested preparation: explain how you would compare expected value, evidence, risk, and trade-offs without assuming every dimension carries equal weight.

How would you turn a strategic objective into an AI product roadmap?

What to coverThe role provides roadmap input alongside the AI Portfolio Manager and works with business, engineering, and research teams. Suggested preparation: describe how you would define the user problem, sequence decisions and milestones, and revisit the roadmap as evidence changes.

How would you assess whether a proposed AI application is ready to build and deploy?

What to coverThe posting emphasizes robust AI solutions, technical rigor, and preferred experience building and deploying AI applications. Suggested preparation: cover feasibility questions to resolve with data scientists and IT, how you would test the solution, and what evidence would support deployment.

How would you verify an AI product's success while identifying risks?

What to coverThe role calls for introducing methods to verify success and identify risks during development. Suggested preparation: distinguish evidence that a solution works as intended from evidence that it improves a business process, and explain how findings would affect product decisions.

How would you discover and address user needs in an AI application?

What to coverThe posting makes user experience and understanding user needs explicit responsibilities. Suggested preparation: explain how you would gather input, translate it into product choices with designers, and check whether the resulting experience meets those needs.

Which metrics would you use to evaluate an AI product after launch?

What to coverThe role defines and monitors KPIs to measure product performance and the impact of AI initiatives. Suggested preparation: distinguish usage and product-performance measures from outcomes under SQDC, and explain what comparison would make an impact claim credible.

What would you do if a launched AI product received poor user feedback?

What to coverThe posting calls for post-launch monitoring, feedback gathering, and feature iteration. Suggested preparation: describe how you would investigate the feedback alongside performance data, prioritize a change, and check whether it improves value delivery.

How would you coordinate AI applications across different parts of GE Vernova?

What to coverCross-business coordination is a stated responsibility. Suggested preparation: discuss how you would identify shared needs and differing constraints, then decide where a common approach makes sense versus a tailored product decision.

How would you evaluate an AI product from a third-party software supplier?

What to coverThe role oversees the introduction of third-party AI products and determines technology fit. Suggested preparation: explain how you would compare the supplier's product with user needs, technical requirements, risks, and measurable value before recommending an approach.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you aligned business, technical, and design stakeholders on a product direction.

What to coverThe role collaborates across business, engineering, research, data science, IT, and design. Suggested preparation: use a real situation, your actions to resolve differing priorities, and the resulting decision or outcome.

Describe a time you communicated a complex product decision to stakeholders with different levels of technical knowledge.

What to coverThe posting prefers communication and presentation skills for diverse stakeholders, occasionally including C-suite executives. Suggested preparation: explain the situation, how you adapted your message and evidence, and what resulted.

Tell me about a time you identified a significant product risk and changed course.

What to coverThe role includes identifying risks, solving challenges, and maintaining technical rigor. Suggested preparation: state the risk and its evidence, the action you took with relevant partners, and the outcome or lesson.

Describe a time post-launch evidence led you to change a product.

What to coverMonitoring performance, gathering user feedback, and iterating on features are stated responsibilities. Suggested preparation: give the situation, the metrics or feedback you considered, your action, and the result.

Tell me about a time you led work across teams with competing priorities.

What to coverThe posting prefers cross-functional leadership and calls for coordination across the business. Suggested preparation: describe the situation, how you established priorities and secured decisions, and the result without overstating your individual contribution.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • SQDC value framework

    The posting says multiple AI products are prioritized and measured through Safety, Quality, Delivery, and Cost. Revise how an AI product might improve one dimension while creating a trade-off in another; explain what evidence would establish net value.

  • Portfolio and roadmap alignment

    The role provides roadmap input alongside the AI Portfolio Manager and aligns products with strategic objectives. Revise the distinction between prioritizing several products and planning delivery within one product; practice explaining a prioritization decision when business needs compete.

  • AI solution rigor and risk

    The posting calls for collaboration with data scientists, IT, and designers to verify success, identify risks, and develop robust AI solutions. Revise the questions you would ask before launch about intended use, evidence of performance, operational readiness, and who would address a failure. The questions are preparation suggestions, not stated employer criteria.

  • User needs and post-launch value

    Understanding user needs, monitoring performance after launch, gathering feedback, and iterating are explicit responsibilities. Revise how to distinguish a feature being used from a feature improving the user's task; sketch what feedback would prompt a product change.

  • Third-party AI technology fit

    The role assesses AI products from third-party software suppliers for technology fit. Revise the difference between an attractive demonstration and a solution that fits the intended users, technical environment, and value measures; use those dimensions to compare two hypothetical suppliers.

Skills to revise

  • Draft a prioritized product roadmap

    Practice ranking three hypothetical AI opportunities, then write a short roadmap rationale showing strategic alignment, user need, expected SQDC impact, and an unresolved risk. This mirrors the stated work of shaping roadmaps across several products.

  • Define and interpret product KPIs

    Create a sample KPI sheet for one hypothetical AI product: define a baseline, a measure of product performance, a measure of SQDC impact, and a review point. Practice deciding what to investigate if usage rises but measured value does not. The posting explicitly calls for analytics and KPI monitoring.

  • Turn feedback into an iteration decision

    Given hypothetical post-launch feedback from users and a performance metric, write a one-paragraph decision to improve, retain, or pause a feature, including what you would check next. This rehearses the stated post-launch monitoring and iteration responsibility.

  • Present a cross-functional decision

    Prepare a brief spoken update on an AI product choice for business, engineering, research, data science, IT, and design stakeholders. State the recommendation, evidence, risk, and decision needed; then condense it for an executive audience. Cross-functional work is a responsibility, while executive presentation is preferred.

  • Compare supplier options

    Build a simple comparison of two hypothetical third-party AI products against user needs, technical fit, verification of success, and SQDC impact. Record what evidence is missing rather than declaring a winner on claims alone. This practices the posting's supplier-evaluation responsibility.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Gather evidence for the stated requirements

    Prepare a concise timeline showing a bachelor's degree in a listed or related field and at least seven years of relevant professional experience. Identify examples of the preferred AI deployment and cross-functional leadership experience, if applicable.

  • Build an AI product walkthrough

    Prepare one project story covering the user need, your product decisions, collaboration with business and technical teams, deployment, risks, and measured outcome. Distinguish your contribution from the team's.

  • Practice a portfolio prioritization exercise

    Using hypothetical AI product opportunities, draft a one-page prioritization and roadmap recommendation. Explain trade-offs through the posting's Safety, Quality, Delivery, and Cost framework and how you would work with an AI Portfolio Manager.

  • Sketch a technically rigorous product design

    For a hypothetical business-process use case, outline the user workflow, data and technical dependencies, success checks, and principal risks. Label the use case as an interview exercise, not a GE Vernova project.

  • Prepare a measurement and iteration plan

    Define example KPIs tied to product performance and SQDC impact, then show how you would monitor results after launch, collect user feedback, and decide what to improve.

  • Draft a third-party AI evaluation

    Create a short comparison template for supplier products covering user fit, technical fit, evidence of performance, risks, and trade-offs. The posting calls for evaluating suppliers but names no specific product.

  • Confirm location and onboarding logistics

    Review the stated U.S. work-authorization and Niskayuna or Cambridge office requirements. If discussing Cambridge, be ready to address the required three-month hybrid onboarding residency in Niskayuna.

  • Rehearse an executive summary and employer questions

    Practice a brief, outcome-focused explanation of your walkthrough for varied stakeholders. Ask how the team selects AI opportunities, verifies success and risk, coordinates across businesses, and measures post-launch SQDC impact.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: Nov 4, 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in United States. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…