New opportunity

AI Engineer

AMETEK, Inc. · Mount Prospect, United States

About this role

The AI Engineer develops and deploys AI/ML-powered software for Atlas’s business operations and product innovation. Working with the software engineering team in Mount Prospect, Illinois, the role turns product and engineering requirements into scalable, reliable applications, including LLM-based tools, copilots and automation solutions.

Responsibilities

  • Build, test and integrate AI applications, APIs, services and supporting data pipelines. Prototype promising use cases with business, engineering and lab-services stakeholders, then deliver maintainable solutions aligned with team architecture and standards.
  • Support production deployment and maintenance of AI/ML applications. Implement monitoring, evaluation and logging; contribute to CI/CD and application or model lifecycle management; and help debug and optimize system performance and reliability.
  • Collaborate on system design, sprint planning and code reviews. Communicate progress, risks and technical trade-offs to the Software Engineering Manager and stakeholders.
  • Follow security, privacy and responsible-AI standards. Support testing, validation and documentation, including quality management processes where applicable.

Required qualifications

  • Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, Software Engineering, Data Science, Data Engineering, Electrical/Computer Engineering or a related field.
  • At least 2 years in software engineering, architecture or applied data/ML engineering, including delivery of AI/ML solutions—model development and/or LLM/RAG applications—into production.
  • Hands-on experience taking AI applications from rapid prototype to deployment and working across data pipelines, evaluation, monitoring, maintenance and MLOps. Experience with LLM prompting patterns, tool/function calling, RAG, embeddings, vector databases, guardrails and evaluation; Azure or AWS; APIs or microservices; CI/CD; and secure deployment.
  • Software design skills and knowledge of data security, privacy, responsible AI, verification and validation, risk-based testing, and quality practices. Ability to identify appropriate AI-tool use cases, critically evaluate AI-generated outputs, collaborate across teams and manage competing tasks.

Preferred

A relevant master’s degree; Azure AI Engineer, AWS ML Specialty, Databricks or equivalent certification; and understanding of embedded ML applications.

The posted salary range is USD 120,000–140,000; the offer depends on qualifications, market and location. The posting lists the employee type as salaried and states there is no incentive.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

AI application developmentMachine learningLarge language modelsPromptingTool callingFunction callingRAGEmbeddingsVector databasesAI guardrailsModel evaluationData pipelinesMLOpsModel monitoringAPIsMicroservicesAzureAWSCI/CDCloud deploymentSoftware designModular developmentSecurityData privacyResponsible AIAccess controlData governanceAuditabilitySoftware validationRisk-based testing flurry

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Deliver AI applications from prototype to production

    The role develops LLM-based tools, copilots and automation, plus the APIs, services and data pipelines that support them. It calls for turning defined requirements into scalable, maintainable software that follows team architecture.

  • Operate and improve deployed systems

    Production responsibilities include monitoring, evaluation, logging, CI/CD and application or model lifecycle management, as well as debugging performance and reliability.

  • Apply security and quality controls

    The posting calls for security, privacy and responsible-AI practices, along with validation, testing and documentation under company processes, including QMS where applicable.

  • Coordinate delivery across teams

    The engineer prototypes use cases with business, engineering and lab-services stakeholders, participates in design discussions, sprint planning and code reviews, and communicates risks and trade-offs to the manager and stakeholders.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing prototype speed with maintainability

    A promising use case may need a quick demonstration, while production work must fit established architecture and standards. As preparation, outline how to assess a use case, test a prototype and decide what must change before deployment; this is a likely trade-off, not a stated company problem.

  • Keeping LLM behavior measurable in production

    LLM outputs can vary, making evaluation and monitoring harder than a simple pass-or-fail test. Prepare an approach to checking output quality, logging failures and investigating reliability or performance without assuming a particular model or metric is used at Atlas.

  • Reconciling AI utility with controls

    Useful data access and tool calling may conflict with privacy, access control, auditability or validation needs. Prepare to explain how you would define boundaries, evaluate generated outputs and use risk-based tests; the posting does not specify a particular compliance regime.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you decide whether a proposed business or lab-services use case needs an AI solution?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain how you would clarify the requirement, compare an AI approach with simpler automation, and define a measurable success criterion. Discuss how you would prototype a promising use case before committing to production.

How would you design a RAG application using embeddings and a vector database?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Cover document preparation, retrieval, prompt context and how you would evaluate whether retrieved material supports the answer. Discuss trade-offs between retrieval quality, latency and maintainability.

How would you make an LLM copilot's tool or function calls reliable?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe clear tool interfaces, input validation, permission boundaries and guardrails for unsuitable requests or outputs. Explain how you would test both successful calls and failure cases.

What would you consider when building a data pipeline for an AI application?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Address data quality, transformations, access and traceability from source to application. Explain how pipeline changes could affect evaluation and production behavior.

How would you structure an AI application as maintainable APIs and services?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Discuss modular boundaries between application logic, model or LLM integration, and data access. Explain how you would follow existing architecture and standards while making components testable and scalable.

How would you evaluate and validate an AI application before release?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe representative test cases, output-quality measures, regression checks and risk-based testing of higher-impact failures. Distinguish software verification from assessing whether AI outputs meet the intended requirement, and address documentation where quality processes apply.

How would you deploy an AI service securely on Azure or AWS?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Discuss access control, protection of sensitive data, governance and auditability without assuming a particular cloud design. Explain how secure deployment choices interact with privacy and responsible-AI requirements.

How would you investigate declining quality or reliability in a production AI application?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain what monitoring, evaluation results and logs you would inspect to separate data, model, retrieval and service issues. Describe how you would verify a fix while considering performance and reliability trade-offs.

What belongs in a CI/CD and lifecycle approach for an AI application?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Cover automated tests, controlled deployment, versioning of application and model-related changes, and post-release checks. Explain how you would make updates maintainable without treating a successful build as proof of output quality.

How would you use an AI tool to improve engineering work without trusting its output blindly?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Identify a suitable task and explain how you would verify generated code, analysis or documentation against requirements and tests. Discuss when review effort, privacy concerns or error risk would outweigh a productivity benefit.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you turned an ambiguous stakeholder need into a working prototype.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Use a real situation involving business or technical stakeholders, then describe your actions to clarify requirements and choose a prototype scope. State the result and what evidence informed the next step.

Describe a time you managed competing engineering tasks under a deadline.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Set out the situation, the priorities and your actions to organize or renegotiate the work. Explain the result, including any quality or delivery trade-off you communicated.

Tell me about a design discussion or code review where you changed your approach.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe the situation, the feedback or disagreement, and how you evaluated it against architecture and maintainability needs. Explain what you did and the resulting decision or improvement.

Describe a time you communicated a technical risk or setback to a manager or stakeholder.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Give the situation, how you explained impact and options, and what action followed. Include the result rather than presenting communication alone as the outcome.

Tell me about a time testing or validation uncovered a significant issue before delivery.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe the situation, the risk you identified and the actions you took with relevant teammates. Explain the result and how the finding affected testing, documentation or the release decision.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • LLM application design

    Posting: Experience with prompting, tool/function calling, RAG, embeddings, vector databases, guardrails and evaluation is required. Suggested revision exercise: diagram a copilot that retrieves documents and calls a function; explain where retrieval errors, unsafe outputs or failed calls could occur.

  • Production AI lifecycle

    Posting: The role spans prototyping, data pipelines, deployment, evaluation, monitoring, maintenance and MLOps. Suggested revision exercise: trace one hypothetical AI application from prototype to production and identify what must change at each stage.

  • Modular architecture and cloud integration

    Posting: The role builds APIs and services, uses Azure or AWS, and follows team architecture and engineering standards. Suggested revision exercise: sketch component boundaries for an AI service and explain how the design supports scaling and maintenance.

  • Security, privacy and responsible AI

    Posting: Required knowledge includes access control, governance and auditability, alongside secure deployment. Suggested revision exercise: review a hypothetical request containing sensitive data and identify access, logging and AI-output risks.

  • Verification and quality practices

    Posting: The role supports validation, documentation and risk-based testing; QMS applies where applicable. Suggested revision exercise: rank failure modes for an AI feature by risk and explain what evidence would validate its behavior.

  • Use-case selection and technical trade-offs

    Posting: The engineer helps identify high-value use cases, critically evaluates AI-generated outputs and communicates risks to stakeholders. Suggested revision exercise: compare an AI-assisted approach with a non-AI approach for one hypothetical lab-services task, stating assumptions and limitations.

Skills to revise

  • Prototype and test a RAG workflow

    Posting: Hands-on LLM/RAG application experience is required. Suggested exercise: build a small retrieval-and-answer prototype with embeddings and a vector database, then test irrelevant retrieval, unsupported answers and a guardrail response.

  • Implement an AI-facing API and data pipeline

    Posting: The role develops and integrates APIs, services and supporting data pipelines. Suggested exercise: create a small service that accepts input, processes records for an AI feature and returns a structured response; test malformed and missing inputs.

  • Instrument and evaluate an application

    Posting: Responsibilities include monitoring, evaluation, logging, debugging and reliability. Suggested exercise: define a small evaluation set, record outcomes and failures, and use the results to diagnose one performance or reliability issue.

  • Practice deployment and lifecycle changes

    Posting: Azure or AWS, CI/CD and secure deployment are required areas of experience. Suggested exercise: plan a deployment on either named cloud platform, including a CI/CD check, access controls, a monitored release and a rollback path.

  • Write risk-based tests and review notes

    Posting: The role supports validation, quality documentation and code reviews. Suggested exercise: write tests for a high-risk AI failure, document expected versus observed behavior, and draft a concise review comment explaining the remaining risk.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map your evidence to the requirements

    Prepare a one-page list of examples or records you can discuss for the required degree, 2+ years of relevant work, production AI/ML delivery, Azure or AWS, APIs, and CI/CD. Keep preferred certifications and embedded ML separate from requirements.

  • Rehearse a production project walkthrough

    If you have a relevant project, prepare a concise account of the requirements, prototype, architecture, data pipeline, deployment, and your contribution. Explain what changed between prototype and production and why.

  • Practice an AI application design exercise

    Sketch a hypothetical LLM tool for an Atlas business or lab-services stakeholder; this is practice, not a stated company project. Show an API and data flow, where RAG or tool calling would help, and how the design would fit established architecture.

  • Prepare an evaluation and validation plan

    Draft test cases and success measures for the hypothetical tool, including output quality, guardrails, failure modes, and risk-based testing. Identify what would need human review and what documentation you would retain.

  • Explain how you would operate it in production

    Create a brief deployment and maintenance outline covering CI/CD, logging, monitoring, debugging, performance, and reliability. Include access control, data privacy, and auditability in the design.

  • Prepare a collaboration example

    Choose an example you can accurately describe of handling competing tasks or a technical trade-off. Practice explaining the decision, risks, and progress in terms suitable for a software engineering manager and cross-functional stakeholders.

  • Bring targeted questions for the team

    Write questions about current AI use cases, architecture standards, production evaluation practices, and when quality-management processes apply. Ask how engineering, product, and lab-services stakeholders prioritize prototypes for deployment.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Oct 1, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: Nov 4, 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in United States. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…