New opportunity

Artificial Intelligence Engineer

SLB · Houston, United States

About this role

SLB seeks an Artificial Intelligence Engineer to integrate AI and generative AI into domain software, including Delfi and Lumi, and deliver production-grade agentic solutions for geoscience and energy workflows. The role works with product teams, domain experts and the AI Foundation Team to turn domain problems into scalable AI systems.

Responsibilities

  • Integrate AI Foundation services—including FM Hub, Model Ops, AI Workspace, Agent Workspace and GenAI Infrastructure—into digital products. Build reusable APIs, components and integration patterns, and provide working demos, reference implementations and workshops to help product teams adopt GenAI.
  • Integrate and deploy domain-specific foundation models in product pipelines. Define benchmark datasets, evaluation metrics and acceptance criteria with domain teams; establish continuous evaluation for model quality, robustness and domain relevance; and help incorporate evaluation into development and release processes. Optimize deployment for efficient inference and production readiness.
  • Design end-to-end agentic solutions using multi-agent systems, reasoning pipelines and tool-use orchestration. Combine foundation models, domain data and simulation tools into compound AI systems for geoscience and energy challenges, and develop agent evaluation frameworks.

Required qualifications

An MS or PhD in Geophysics, Geoscience, Petroleum Engineering, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Applied Math or an equivalent field; experience integrating, deploying and evaluating AI/ML models; and proven experience building and deploying production agentic systems. Candidates need experience with cloud-based AI infrastructure, Model Ops and scalable service integration; familiarity with geoscience, subsurface or energy workflows; and the ability to collaborate across teams and deliver technical training and documentation.

Preferred qualifications

Experience with foundation models, large language models and domain-specific AI; applications in seismic interpretation or reservoir simulation; familiarity with subsurface software platforms; experience with AI benchmarking pipelines, evaluation frameworks or automated testing; and knowledge of agent-based architectures and domain agent design.

Location: Houston, United States. The posting lists health, vision and dental insurance for employees and dependents from day one.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Artificial IntelligenceGenerative AIMachine LearningAgentic AIMulti-agent systemsTool-use orchestrationReasoning pipelinesFoundation modelsLarge language modelsModel integrationModel deploymentModel evaluationModel OpsCloud-based AI infrastructureAPI developmentBenchmarkingAutomated testingInference optimizationGeosciencePetroleum engineeringSeismic interpretationReservoir simulationTechnical trainingTechnical documentation

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Integrate AI services into digital products

    The role integrates FM Hub, Model Ops, AI Workspace, Agent Workspace and GenAI Infrastructure into products such as Delfi and Lumi, using reusable APIs, components and integration patterns.

  • Deploy and evaluate domain foundation models

    The engineer deploys domain-specific models in workflows and product pipelines, defines benchmarks, metrics and acceptance criteria with domain teams, and supports continuous evaluation in development and releases.

  • Ship production-grade domain agents

    The posting calls for end-to-end agentic solutions that combine foundation models, domain data and simulation tools through multi-agent orchestration, reasoning pipelines and tool use. Production experience with agentic systems is required.

  • Enable adoption across teams

    The engineer works with product teams, domain experts and the AI Foundation Team, providing working demos, reference implementations, workshops, training and documentation.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing shared integrations with product needs

    A likely trade-off is making reusable AI components while fitting different Delfi and Lumi workflows. Prepare to explain how an integration pattern could expose common services yet leave room for product-specific behavior; the posting does not specify either product’s architecture.

  • Proving domain relevance before release

    A likely difficulty is that general model-quality measures may not capture whether outputs are useful in geoscience or energy workflows. Prepare an approach for agreeing on domain benchmarks and acceptance criteria with experts, then running evaluation continuously.

  • Managing agent complexity in production

    Combining multiple agents, tools, domain data and simulations may create a trade-off between capable workflows and reliable, efficient inference. Prepare to discuss how to evaluate agent behavior and optimize deployment without assuming a particular SLB implementation.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you integrate AI Foundation services into a product such as Delfi or Lumi?

What to coverThe posting names FM Hub, Model Ops, AI Workspace, Agent Workspace and GenAI Infrastructure as services to integrate. Suggested preparation: explain how you would define service boundaries, connect a product workflow and verify that the integration is ready for production.

What makes a GenAI integration pattern reusable across product teams?

What to coverThe role calls for reusable APIs, components and integration patterns. Suggested preparation: discuss stable interfaces, configuration and the trade-off between a shared component and a product-specific implementation.

How would you deploy a domain-specific foundation model in a product pipeline?

What to coverThe posting requires model integration and deployment with domain-aligned behavior and performance. Suggested preparation: describe how you would connect the model to domain inputs and outputs, validate its behavior and plan for model changes.

How would you define a benchmark with geoscience domain experts?

What to coverThe role includes jointly defining benchmark datasets, evaluation metrics and acceptance criteria. Suggested preparation: explain how representative cases and domain judgments would inform the benchmark, including how you would handle gaps or disagreements in the data.

How would you make model evaluation continuous through a release process?

What to coverThe posting calls for continuous evaluation of quality, robustness and domain relevance, embedded in development and release work. Suggested preparation: describe when evaluations would run, how results would be compared and what evidence would support an acceptance decision.

How would you evaluate inference efficiency without losing domain performance?

What to coverThe role includes optimizing deployment workflows for inference efficiency and production readiness. Suggested preparation: discuss how you would measure performance and cost alongside domain quality, then explain the trade-offs behind a deployment choice.

How would you design a multi-agent reasoning and tool-use workflow?

What to coverThe posting calls for production-grade agentic solutions involving multi-agent orchestration, reasoning pipelines and tool use. Suggested preparation: explain why you would divide responsibilities among agents or tools, how information would pass between them and where failures would be detected.

How would you combine foundation models, domain data and simulation tools?

What to coverThe role describes compound AI systems for geoscience and energy challenges. Suggested preparation: choose a clearly identified illustrative workflow and explain how each element would contribute, including how you would check outputs against domain constraints.

How would you evaluate an end-to-end domain agent?

What to coverThe posting explicitly calls for agent evaluation frameworks, separate from evaluating a foundation model alone. Suggested preparation: cover task completion, tool-use errors and robustness across representative domain cases, and explain how failures would be traced to a component.

What would you need to learn before applying AI to seismic interpretation or reservoir simulation?

What to coverThese applications are listed as preferred experience, while familiarity with geoscience, subsurface or energy workflows is required. Suggested preparation: explain how you would work with domain experts to map inputs, decisions and validation criteria rather than assume that a general model metric establishes domain usefulness.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you translated a domain problem into a technical solution.

What to coverThe role expects translation of geoscience or energy problems into agentic solutions. Suggested preparation: use a real situation, explain how you established the domain need and chose an approach, then state the result without overstating your contribution.

Tell me about a time you coordinated an integration across teams.

What to coverThe posting names product teams, domain experts and the AI Foundation Team as collaborators. Suggested preparation: describe the situation, your actions to resolve dependencies or differing priorities, and the resulting integration outcome.

Tell me about a time you agreed on evaluation criteria with subject-matter experts.

What to coverThe role requires collaboration on benchmarks, metrics and acceptance criteria. Suggested preparation: give a real example of the initial disagreement or uncertainty, how you reached a workable definition and what resulted.

Tell me about a time you helped others adopt a technical capability.

What to coverThe posting calls for demos, reference implementations, workshops, training and documentation. Suggested preparation: describe the audience and situation, what you created or taught, and the observable result.

Tell me about a time you improved a system for production use.

What to coverThe role emphasizes deploying production-grade agentic systems and improving inference efficiency and readiness. Suggested preparation: describe a real production constraint, the trade-off you made, your actions and the measured or observed result.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Production agent architectures

    Posting: The role requires production agentic systems using multi-agent orchestration, reasoning pipelines and tool use. Revision exercise: Diagram when a single agent versus multiple agents should coordinate domain data and a simulation tool; mark failure points and how you would evaluate the result.

  • Domain model evaluation

    Posting: The engineer defines benchmark datasets, metrics and acceptance criteria with domain teams, then establishes continuous evaluation for quality, robustness and domain relevance. Revision exercise: Draft an evaluation plan for a hypothetical geoscience model, separating test cases, metrics, acceptance criteria and release checks.

  • AI Foundation service integration

    Posting: The role integrates FM Hub, Model Ops, AI Workspace, Agent Workspace and GenAI Infrastructure into products such as Delfi and Lumi. Revision exercise: Sketch a conceptual integration diagram showing where model access, agent execution, evaluation and product-facing APIs belong; treat exact internal interfaces as unknown.

  • Geoscience and energy workflows

    Posting: Familiarity with geoscience, subsurface or energy workflows is required; seismic interpretation and reservoir simulation are preferred application areas. Revision exercise: Trace one of those workflows from domain inputs to a decision, identifying where model output would need domain-expert validation.

  • Inference and release trade-offs

    Posting: Deployment must support efficient inference and production readiness, with evaluation embedded in development and release processes. Revision exercise: Explain how you would weigh inference efficiency against domain-relevant quality and robustness, and what evidence would justify a release.

Skills to revise

  • Build a tool-using agent prototype

    Posting: Building and deploying production agentic systems is required. Practice exercise: Implement a small agent workflow that calls a mock domain-data service and simulation tool; demonstrate tool selection, failure handling and an evaluable output. The mock setup is a preparation suggestion, not a stated employer tool.

  • Create a repeatable benchmark

    Posting: The role calls for benchmark datasets, evaluation metrics, acceptance criteria and continuous evaluation. Practice exercise: Assemble a small illustrative test set, run a domain-model or agent workflow against it, record failures and apply explicit pass criteria. Synthetic cases are a preparation suggestion, not SLB data.

  • Design a reusable service integration

    Posting: Reusable APIs, components and integration patterns should bring AI Foundation services into digital products. Practice exercise: Draft an API contract and a reference integration flow for model inference, including inputs, outputs, error handling and how a product team would reuse it; do not assume SLB's internal interfaces.

  • Walk through deployment operations

    Posting: Cloud-based AI infrastructure, Model Ops, scalable service integration and production deployment are required. Practice exercise: Present a deployment and rollback walkthrough covering model versioning, evaluation checks, inference efficiency and service failures, without assuming a specific cloud provider.

  • Deliver a technical enablement demo

    Posting: The engineer provides working demos, reference implementations, workshops, training and documentation across product and domain teams. Practice exercise: Prepare a short demo and one-page integration guide, then explain the same agent workflow to both a product engineer and a domain expert.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map the role to your evidence

    Prepare a one-page evidence map for the posted advanced-degree, model integration and evaluation, production agentic systems, cloud infrastructure, Model Ops, and domain-workflow requirements. Mark any gaps rather than inventing examples.

  • Build a production agent walkthrough

    Select a real project, if available, and prepare a diagram and concise account of its agents, reasoning pipeline, tool use, deployment, evaluation, failure handling, and your specific contributions. The posting explicitly requires production agentic-system experience.

  • Sketch a product integration design

    As a practice exercise, draw how a reusable API or component could connect a digital product to the listed AI Foundation services. Explain service boundaries, scaling, inference efficiency, and what a working demo would show; do not assume undocumented details of Delfi or Lumi.

  • Draft a domain-focused agent design

    Prepare a hypothetical geoscience or energy workflow showing how foundation models, domain data, and a simulation tool could work together. Identify where a domain expert would validate the problem and the agent’s outputs.

  • Create an evaluation plan

    Draft a sample benchmark specification with proposed datasets, quality and robustness metrics, domain-relevance checks, acceptance criteria, and continuous evaluation during development and release. Label proposed thresholds as examples, not SLB requirements.

  • Prepare an enablement example

    Outline a short reference implementation or workshop you could use to explain an integration pattern to product teams, including a demo flow, documentation outline, and questions for domain experts.

  • Write questions for the interview team

    Ask which domain workflows are the initial priorities, how teams currently define agent and model acceptance criteria, and where this role would coordinate with product teams, domain experts, and the AI Foundation Team.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: Nov 4, 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in United States. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…