New opportunity

AI Product Management, VP II - State Street Investment Management

State Street Investment Management · Boston, United States of America

About this role

State Street Investment Management’s Data, Analytics and AI Services team seeks a Vice President to shape and deliver AI-enabled products across its investment management business. The role connects business functions with AI engineering teams, turning workflows, pain points and opportunities into scalable capabilities with measurable business impact. It supports AI transformation across investment, product, client, finance and operations functions.

Responsibilities

  • Work with stakeholders to understand and redesign workflows, and translate business problems into AI product lines, reusable features and scalable services that improve efficiency and support enterprise adoption.
  • Assess competitor, big tech and fintech AI offerings to inform the product roadmap and portfolio.
  • Lead implementation using Agile methodologies, manage roadmap milestones and releases from concept through production, and review deliverables from AI engineering, data science and financial engineering teams.
  • Demonstrate capabilities, communicate releases and business impact, manage stakeholder expectations, and coordinate daily work across onshore and offshore teams.

Required qualifications

  • Master’s degree in computer science, engineering, finance or a related quantitative discipline.
  • 15+ years in asset management, with exposure to portfolio management, trading, sales, client relationship management, product research, finance or operations; 10+ years of asset-management product management across the technology product lifecycle; 6+ years of AI engineering or adjacent AI-related experience; and 5+ years leading technology-enabled transformation initiatives, including program or project management.
  • Understanding of machine learning, predictive AI, generative AI and agentic AI. Hands-on experience designing multi-agent workflows, including human-on-the-loop command patterns and autonomous workflows. Proficiency with platforms such as Google Gemini Enterprise and AWS Bedrock and languages such as Python and SQL; familiarity with Anthropic Claude Code and GitHub Copilot.

Preferred

AI Product Manager experience at a financial institution and CFA Level II completion or equivalent certification.

The Boston salary range is $120,000–$202,500 annually; the range may differ outside the primary location. Benefits include a 401(k) with company match, insurance, paid time off, an employee assistance program and eligibility for annual performance-based awards.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

AI product managementAsset managementProduct roadmappingAgile methodologiesStakeholder managementCross-functional coordinationMachine learningPredictive AIGenerative AIAgentic AIMulti-agent workflowsHuman-on-the-loop workflowsGoogle Gemini EnterpriseAWS BedrockPythonSQLAnthropic Claude CodeGitHub CopilotProgram managementProject management

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Turn asset-management workflows into AI products

    The role partners with stakeholders across investment, product, client, finance and operations functions to identify pain points and translate them into AI product lines, reusable features and scalable services.

  • Set a commercially informed AI roadmap

    Assess competitor, big-tech and fintech AI offerings to identify emerging capabilities and inform the product roadmap and portfolio.

  • Deliver and validate products through production

    Lead Agile implementation, manage milestones and releases from concept through production, and review engineering, data science and financial engineering deliverables to support rapid iteration.

  • Drive adoption through communication and coordination

    Demonstrate capabilities, communicate releases and measurable business impact, manage stakeholder expectations, and coordinate day-to-day work across onshore and offshore teams.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balance local needs with reusable capabilities

    A likely tension is that workflows across business functions differ, while the role calls for scalable services and enterprise-wide adoption. Prepare an example of how to identify shared needs without losing the value of a specific workflow.

  • Choose the right degree of agent autonomy

    Because the role requires both human-on-the-loop command patterns and autonomous multi-agent workflows, a likely design challenge is deciding where human direction adds value versus where autonomy improves efficiency. Prepare to explain the trade-off in a concrete workflow; the posting does not specify a firm-wide decision rule.

  • Keep releases moving without weakening validation

    The posting calls for accelerated release cycles as well as review and validation of technical deliverables. A likely challenge is balancing speed with product quality across several specialist teams. Prepare an example of how feedback, priorities and release decisions were handled under that tension.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you identify an AI product opportunity in an investment-management workflow?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would map the current workflow with stakeholders, identify a specific pain point, and distinguish an AI opportunity from a simpler process change. Describe how you would establish a baseline and define a measurable business outcome.

When should a business problem become a reusable AI feature rather than a one-off solution?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss how you would compare needs across investment, product, client, finance, or operations functions without assuming their workflows are identical. Address the trade-off between shared capabilities and function-specific requirements.

How would you choose between predictive machine learning, generative AI, and agentic AI for a product use case?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare the type of task each approach can address, the data it needs, and how its output would be evaluated. Explain when added autonomy would not justify its complexity.

How would you design a multi-agent workflow with human-on-the-loop oversight?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe agent responsibilities, handoffs, monitoring, and the points at which a person can intervene. Contrast that design with an autonomous workflow, including how you would handle errors or uncertain outputs.

How would you assess Google Gemini Enterprise or AWS Bedrock for an AI product capability?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare the platforms against the use case, integration needs, implementation effort, and ability to support a reusable service. Explain how Python and SQL could help you inspect data or test a product assumption without claiming either platform is already in use for a particular product.

How would you validate deliverables from AI engineering, data science, and financial engineering teams?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Define acceptance criteria tied to the business problem, then describe how you would examine output quality and provide actionable feedback. Address trade-offs between rapid iteration and confidence that a deliverable is ready for release.

How would you manage an AI product roadmap from concept through production using Agile methods?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would break the work into testable increments, track milestones, and revise priorities as evidence emerges. Discuss what would justify accelerating or delaying a release.

How would you use competitor, big-tech, and fintech AI offerings to inform the roadmap?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe a consistent way to assess an offering’s relevant capabilities and compare them with stakeholder needs. Explain why a visible market feature might still be a poor fit for the product portfolio.

How would you measure whether an AI product improves efficiency and gains enterprise adoption?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Propose measures tied to the original workflow, such as time spent, output quality, and sustained use, while explaining their limitations. Distinguish a successful demonstration from measurable business impact after release.

What would you do if a released AI capability produced inconsistent results?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Walk through how you would establish the scope, inspect inputs and outputs with the relevant teams, and decide what to communicate to stakeholders. Explain the trade-off between a rapid fix and further validation before the next release.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time stakeholders disagreed on a product priority.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Give the situation, the competing needs, your actions to establish priorities, and the result. Make your own decision-making and communication clear without implying that every stakeholder agreed.

Tell me about a time you coordinated delivery across teams in different locations.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the situation, how you handled handoffs, communication, and dependencies, and the delivery result. Focus on your actions rather than attributing the outcome solely to the wider team.

Tell me about a time you challenged a technical deliverable before release.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain the situation, the evidence behind your feedback, how you worked with specialists on an iteration, and the result. Include how you balanced quality with the delivery timeline.

Tell me about a time you introduced a technology-enabled change to an established workflow.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Set out the original workflow and the people affected, then describe your actions to support adoption and the result. Use evidence of changed ways of working or business impact rather than relying on a launch announcement.

Tell me about a time you communicated a product release or setback to senior stakeholders.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the situation, what you communicated about progress and impact, how you managed expectations, and the result. Explain how you handled uncertainty or a change in milestones.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Asset-management workflows

    The role spans investment, product, client, finance and operations functions and requires asset-management experience. Revise by sketching how a portfolio-management or client-service workflow moves between teams, then identify a pain point an AI product could address.

  • Reusable AI product capabilities

    The posting calls for translating business problems into product lines, reusable features and scalable services. Revise by taking two related workflow problems and explaining which capability could serve both, how it would be adopted and how its impact could be measured.

  • AI capability selection

    A strong understanding of machine learning, predictive AI, generative AI and agentic AI is required. Revise by comparing where each would and would not fit one asset-management workflow, including what evidence would justify the choice.

  • Multi-agent operating patterns

    The posting explicitly requires human-on-the-loop command patterns and autonomous agentic workflows. Revise by diagramming both approaches to the same task, showing agent responsibilities, human intervention points and failure handling.

  • Product lifecycle and transformation

    The role leads Agile implementation from concept through production and technology-enabled transformation across functions. Revise by outlining the decisions, milestones and stakeholder communication needed to move a proposed capability through that lifecycle.

  • AI market assessment

    Assessing competitor, big-tech and fintech AI offerings is a stated roadmap responsibility. As a preparation exercise, build a brief comparison framework covering the capability offered, relevance to an investment-management workflow and implications for roadmap priority.

Skills to revise

  • Map and reframe a workflow

    Practice interviewing a hypothetical business stakeholder: document the current steps, pain points and desired outcome, then write a concise AI product problem statement. This mirrors the role’s workflow-discovery and redesign work.

  • Build an Agile delivery plan

    Practice turning that problem statement into a small release roadmap with priorities, milestones and feedback points from concept through production. The posting assigns responsibility for Agile execution and releases.

  • Design a multi-agent workflow

    Draft a hands-on workflow specification with agent tasks, handoffs, a human-on-the-loop command pattern and a contrasting autonomous path. This directly rehearses the required design and implementation experience.

  • Exercise the named technical stack

    Using a small sample dataset, practice Python and SQL analysis and outline how you would implement the resulting AI capability with Google Gemini Enterprise or AWS Bedrock. Review how Anthropic Claude Code or GitHub Copilot could assist development; the posting requires platform and language proficiency and familiarity with those assistants.

  • Review technical deliverables

    Practice reviewing a hypothetical AI engineering, data science or financial engineering deliverable against its product goal. Write specific feedback, unresolved questions and a recommendation for the next iteration; reviewing and validating these teams’ work is a stated responsibility.

  • Communicate a release across teams

    Rehearse a short capability demonstration and release update that states the milestone, measured or proposed business impact, open decisions and next priorities. Tailor a handoff note for onshore and offshore teams; both stakeholder communication and day-to-day coordination appear in the posting.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Assemble a requirements evidence sheet

    Map verifiable education and experience to the posting’s master’s degree and stated years in asset management, product management, AI-related work, and transformation leadership. Note relevant business functions and any preferred qualifications only if applicable.

  • Prepare an asset-management product walkthrough

    Choose a real example, if available, and outline the workflow and stakeholder pain point, product decisions, reusable capabilities, lifecycle milestones, and measured impact. Distinguish results from estimates.

  • Sketch a multi-agent workflow

    For a plausible investment, client, finance, or operations use case, draw the agent handoffs, human-on-the-loop commands, autonomous actions, and points for review. Present it as a proposed design, not a company project.

  • Gather technical decision examples

    Prepare concise evidence of work with predictive, generative, or agentic AI and, where applicable, Google Gemini Enterprise, AWS Bedrock, Python, and SQL. Be ready to explain design trade-offs and any familiarity with Claude Code or GitHub Copilot.

  • Draft a roadmap prioritization exercise

    Create a sample scoring table for AI opportunities using business impact, reuse, feasibility, and adoption as proposed criteria. Show how an assessment of competitor, big-tech, and fintech offerings could inform priorities without presenting assumptions as research findings.

  • Rehearse a delivery and stakeholder narrative

    Outline how you would explain Agile milestones from concept to production, review engineering and data-science deliverables, coordinate onshore and offshore work, demonstrate releases, and communicate impact. Ground examples in actual experience where possible.

  • Prepare questions for the employer

    Ask which business workflows are priorities, how reusable AI capabilities are selected, who validates technical deliverables, and how adoption and business impact are measured. These questions follow the advertised responsibilities; the posting does not supply the answers.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: Nov 4, 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in United States of America. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…