New opportunity

Manager Data Science, GenAI

AIG PC Global Services, Inc. · Atlanta, United States of America

About this role

AIG seeks a hands-on Manager of Data Science to lead a team delivering enterprise-level generative AI solutions for insurance and risk management. The applied data science team works in an agile, production-oriented environment; candidates with only managerial or architecture experience are not sought.

Responsibilities

  • Oversee development and delivery of data science and generative AI solutions aligned with business requirements, and monitor them in production.
  • Create and execute technical delivery plans to ship solutions on time; mentor junior data scientists and collaborate with product managers, engineers and business leaders.
  • Build evaluation frameworks to assess LLM effectiveness and ground-truth dataset quality, informing the product development roadmap.

Required qualifications

  • At least 7 years in a data science role, preferably involving NLP, in an agile, production-oriented environment; at least 3 years managing data scientists and/or engineers.
  • At least 2 years of hands-on generative AI development involving prompt engineering, RAG and agentic frameworks, validation pipelines, and observability and monitoring solutions.
  • A Ph.D. or master's degree in Data Science, Computer Science or a related field. The role requires clear communication, cross-team collaboration, hands-on technical practice, people management and execution in a fast-paced environment.

Preferred qualifications include Palantir platform experience or demonstrated certification; ontology knowledge for mapping entities and relationships into digital twins; big-data performance optimization using distributed processing frameworks such as Apache Spark or PySpark; and implementation of autonomous, multi-step agents or integration of agentic solutions with enterprise systems.

The role is based in Atlanta, Georgia. AIG asks team members to work primarily in the office. Its Total Rewards Program includes health, wellbeing, financial-security and professional-development benefits.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Data ScienceGenerative AINatural Language ProcessingLarge Language ModelsPrompt EngineeringRetrieval-Augmented GenerationAI AgentsLLM EvaluationGround-Truth Dataset EvaluationValidation PipelinesObservabilityProduction MonitoringTechnical Delivery PlanningPeople ManagementMentoringCross-Functional CollaborationPalantirOntologyDigital TwinsBig DataPerformance OptimizationApache SparkPySpark

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Deliver business-aligned GenAI solutions

    The manager oversees enterprise-level solutions aligned with business requirements and creates technical plans to ship them on time in an agile, production-oriented environment.

  • Remain hands-on technically

    The posting explicitly calls for a practicing manager, not a purely managerial or architecture-focused role. It names hands-on work with prompts, RAG, agentic frameworks and validation pipelines.

  • Make evaluation guide product decisions

    A stated responsibility is building frameworks that measure LLM effectiveness and ground-truth dataset quality, then using the results to inform the product roadmap.

  • Own production monitoring

    The role includes monitoring delivered solutions in production; the qualifications also call for experience with observability and monitoring solutions.

  • Develop the team and coordinate delivery

    The manager builds and oversees a data science team, mentors junior data scientists, and works with product managers, engineers and business leaders.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing technical depth with team leadership

    Likely preparation challenge: hands-on development can compete for time with mentoring and delivery oversight. Prepare an example that distinguishes technical decisions you owned from work you delegated and explains how you supported the team.

  • Choosing what evaluation results mean

    Likely preparation challenge: an LLM score may be hard to interpret if the ground-truth dataset is weak. Prepare to explain how you would assess dataset quality, interpret effectiveness results and decide what should change on the roadmap.

  • Shipping promptly without losing production visibility

    Likely preparation challenge: delivery deadlines can pull against validation and monitoring work. Prepare a concrete account of how you would plan releases, define validation checks and use production observations to guide follow-up work.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you improve a prompt for a generative AI solution?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would define the task, test prompts against representative cases, and compare output quality. Discuss when prompt changes are insufficient and another approach is needed.

How would you design and troubleshoot a retrieval-augmented generation solution?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Walk through retrieval, use of retrieved context, and checks that an answer is supported by that context. Distinguish retrieval failures from generation failures when diagnosing poor answers.

When would an agentic approach be preferable to a simpler workflow?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare the value of multi-step reasoning or enterprise-system integration with added complexity and failure risk. Explain how you would bound and validate an agent’s actions.

How would you evaluate whether an LLM solution is effective?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Connect evaluation criteria to the business requirement and assess performance across representative cases, not just an aggregate score. Explain how results would inform product-roadmap decisions.

How would you assess the quality of a ground-truth dataset?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Address coverage, label consistency, ambiguous cases, and whether the dataset reflects the intended use. Explain how defects in ground truth could mislead LLM evaluation.

What would a validation pipeline check before a generative AI release?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe repeatable checks for output quality and regressions using representative test cases. Explain what evidence would justify release or further investigation.

How would you monitor and troubleshoot a generative AI solution in production?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss signals for output quality, failures, and changing usage patterns, alongside a way to investigate concerning results. Distinguish what monitoring can reveal from issues that require human review.

How would you turn a business requirement into a technical delivery plan?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would define scope, dependencies, evaluation milestones, and responsibilities across data science, engineering, and product. Address trade-offs when a deadline conflicts with evidence that a solution is not ready.

How could an ontology support an AI application built around a digital twin?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would represent real-world entities and relationships and check that the mapping remains meaningful to users. This is a preferred qualification in the posting; discuss it as a possible design approach, not an assumed project.

How would you diagnose slow processing of a large dataset in Spark or PySpark?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe how you would locate a bottleneck before changing partitioning, joins, or data movement, then measure the effect. Spark and PySpark appear as preferred experience, so frame this as preparation for that stated topic rather than a required tool choice.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you aligned product, engineering, and business stakeholders on a data science deliverable.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use situation, action, and result to show how you clarified differing requirements and communicated a decision. Be specific about your contribution and the outcome.

Describe a time you developed a junior data scientist while maintaining delivery progress.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use situation, action, and result to explain the development need, the support you provided, and what changed. Distinguish mentoring from simply assigning work.

Tell me about a time you had to be both a hands-on practitioner and a people manager.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use situation, action, and result to show why your direct technical involvement mattered and what you delegated. Explain how you protected the team’s ability to deliver.

Describe a time a fast-moving deadline required a difficult delivery trade-off.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use situation, action, and result to explain the options, the evidence behind your choice, and how you communicated the risk. Keep the example focused on execution rather than speed alone.

Tell me about a time evaluation results changed your product or technical direction.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use situation, action, and result to describe what the evidence showed, how you responded with stakeholders, and what followed. This is suggested practice based on the role’s responsibility to use evaluation to guide the roadmap.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Prompting, RAG and agentic design

    The posting requires hands-on generative AI experience with prompt engineering, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and agentic frameworks. As a revision exercise, sketch how each approach would handle the same hypothetical insurance-information question, including when retrieval or multi-step actions would add value.

  • LLM and ground-truth evaluation

    The role builds frameworks to assess LLM effectiveness and ground-truth dataset quality. Draft a conceptual evaluation rubric for a hypothetical risk-management answer, then identify how inaccurate or ambiguous reference answers could distort the results.

  • Validation and production monitoring

    Validation pipelines, observability and monitoring are stated requirements, and the manager monitors deployed solutions. Trace a hypothetical release from pre-release checks through production monitoring; explain what evidence would prompt investigation.

  • Technical delivery and team leadership

    The manager must plan and ship work, mentor junior data scientists, and collaborate with product managers, engineers and business leaders while remaining hands-on. For revision, outline the decisions and team responsibilities in a hypothetical delivery plan, including how business requirements become testable milestones.

  • Ontologies and digital twins — preferred

    The posting lists mapping real-world entities and relationships into a digital-twin framework as a preferred qualification. As optional preparation, draw a small conceptual entity-and-relationship model for a hypothetical insurance use case and explain how it could support an AI application.

  • Distributed-data performance — preferred

    Big-data optimization using distributed processing such as Apache Spark or PySpark is preferred, not required. As optional preparation, review a hypothetical slow distributed-data workflow and explain where data volume, partitioning or joins might affect performance.

Skills to revise

  • Prototype and compare GenAI approaches

    As a practice exercise, build a small hypothetical question-answering flow with a prompt-only version and a RAG version, then describe how an agentic version would differ. This rehearses the posting’s explicit hands-on prompt, RAG and agentic-framework requirement; no particular framework is specified.

  • Construct an evaluation set and score outputs

    Create a small, clearly labeled practice set of questions and reference answers; check the references for ambiguity, score sample LLM outputs, and summarize failure patterns. This directly rehearses the required LLM and ground-truth evaluation work.

  • Implement validation and monitoring checks

    For a practice GenAI flow, define input and output validation checks, record observable failure cases, and make a simple production-monitoring checklist. The exercise reflects the posting’s validation-pipeline, observability and monitoring requirements; it is not a claim about AIG’s tooling.

  • Write and communicate a delivery plan

    Turn a hypothetical business request into scoped milestones, evaluation criteria, engineering dependencies and a mentoring task; practice explaining trade-offs to product, engineering and business stakeholders. This mirrors the role’s delivery, collaboration and people-management responsibilities.

  • Profile a distributed-data job — preferred

    If revising the preferred big-data qualification, use Apache Spark or PySpark to inspect a practice data-processing job, identify a bottleneck and compare performance before and after a change. The posting names these frameworks as examples, not mandatory tools.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map the stated requirements to evidence

    Prepare a one-page evidence map for the posted experience and degree requirements: 7+ years in data science, 3+ years managing data scientists or engineers, 2+ years of hands-on GenAI development, and a relevant master’s or Ph.D. Note where NLP or production-oriented work applies; do not fill gaps with assumptions.

  • Build a hands-on GenAI project walkthrough

    The role emphasizes hands-on delivery, not management or architecture alone. Prepare one project walkthrough showing your own technical contributions to prompt engineering, RAG or agentic frameworks, validation pipelines, and production observability or monitoring, where applicable.

  • Draft an LLM evaluation example

    The posting calls for frameworks that assess LLM effectiveness and ground-truth dataset quality. Prepare a concise example with proposed measures, dataset-quality checks, and how results would inform a product roadmap; label any example not drawn from your work as hypothetical.

  • Practice a technical delivery plan

    For a hypothetical enterprise GenAI use case in insurance or risk management, outline business requirements, implementation milestones, cross-team dependencies, production monitoring, and how you would manage delivery timing. This is a preparation exercise, not a stated AIG project.

  • Select people-management and collaboration examples

    Prepare brief examples of mentoring junior data scientists, managing a team, and working with product managers, engineers, and business leaders. Identify your actions, decisions, and outcomes without implying experience you have not had.

  • Prepare optional depth on preferred qualifications

    If relevant to your experience, assemble specific examples of Palantir work or certification, ontology-to-digital-twin mapping, Spark or PySpark performance optimization, or multi-step agents and enterprise integration. The posting identifies these as preferred, not required.

  • Write targeted questions for the employer

    Ask how the new GenAI team selects use cases, measures LLM and ground-truth quality, divides hands-on work from team management, and monitors deployed solutions. You can also clarify what primarily in-office work means for this Atlanta role.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Oct 1, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: Nov 4, 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in United States of America. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…