New opportunity

Lead Specialist, AI Scientist

Pearson · Atlanta, United States

About this role

Pearson seeks a Lead Specialist, AI Scientist to design, build, deploy and scale production AI/ML capabilities for learner intelligence, knowledge graphs, recommendations and personalized learning. The role connects AI research, data science, software engineering and product delivery, taking solutions from experiments to measurable learner and business outcomes.

Responsibilities

  • Lead production AI capabilities and deliver generative AI, LLM, retrieval-augmented generation and agentic AI solutions. Build reusable platform services, APIs and workflows for Pearson products.
  • Own prototyping, deployment, monitoring, evaluation and continuous improvement. Establish MLOps and AIOps practices for training, observability, governance, reliability and operations.
  • Assess foundation models and architectures against quality, safety, scalability, latency and cost. Establish responsible AI, prompt-engineering, model-evaluation and agent-evaluation practices.
  • Collaborate with Product, Engineering, Design, Learning Science and Data Science; mentor technical colleagues and communicate strategy, trade-offs, risks and outcomes to stakeholders. Deliver secure, observable and cost-efficient systems that improve learner engagement, efficacy and productivity.

Required qualifications

At least 5 years building and deploying production AI/ML systems, including cloud-native applications and MLOps. Experience with applied machine learning and relevant generative AI, LLM, RAG, recommendation, knowledge-graph or agentic solutions; foundation models and modern AI frameworks; Python, APIs, testing, CI/CD and version control; scalable AI services in AWS or similar clouds; containerization, orchestration and infrastructure as code. Experience evaluating and optimizing AI system quality, reliability, safety, latency, scalability and cost, plus strong collaboration and communication skills. A bachelor's degree in Computer Science, Engineering, Data Science or AI/ML, or equivalent practical experience, is required.

Preferred

A relevant master's degree or PhD; educational technology or learning-science experience; familiarity with psychometrics, proficiency modeling, Bayesian methods, item response theory or educational measurement; enterprise-scale AI platforms, knowledge graphs or agentic systems; and research, patents, open-source or thought-leadership contributions.

The posting lists Atlanta, GA and a Hybrid workplace type, while the role description states “Remote, United States.” The full-time salary range is $150,000–$190,000, with eligibility for an annual incentive program. The stated application window is through August 30th and may be extended.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Machine LearningGenerative AILarge Language ModelsRetrieval-Augmented GenerationAI AgentsRecommendation SystemsKnowledge GraphsMLOpsAIOpsPythonAPI DevelopmentTestingCI/CDVersion ControlAWSContainerizationOrchestrationInfrastructure as CodeModel EvaluationPrompt EngineeringResponsible AIAI GovernanceOpenAIAnthropicAmazon BedrockAzure OpenAILangGraphLangChainSemantic KernelVector Databases

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Production AI for personalized learning

    Lead deployed learner-intelligence, recommendation, knowledge-graph and AI-powered learning capabilities. The posting emphasizes measurable learner engagement, efficacy and business outcomes, not just working prototypes.

  • Generative AI delivery

    Design and deliver LLM, retrieval-augmented generation and agentic AI solutions that integrate into Pearson products and create measurable impact.

  • Reusable platforms and operational ownership

    Build shared AI services, APIs and workflows, and own the path from experimentation through deployment, monitoring, evaluation and improvement. Establish scalable MLOps and AIOps practices.

  • Evaluation and responsible operation

    Assess models and architectures against quality, safety, scalability, latency and cost. Establish practices for model and agent evaluation, responsible AI and governance.

  • Technical leadership across disciplines

    Partner with Product, Engineering, Design, Learning Science and Data Science; mentor technical colleagues; and explain architecture decisions, risks and outcomes to stakeholders.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Measuring learning impact

    Likely preparation challenge: a useful AI feature may not demonstrate improved learning efficacy. Prepare to explain how you would distinguish engagement or productivity measures from learning outcomes and work with Learning Science on evaluation; the posting does not prescribe specific metrics.

  • Balancing model performance and operating constraints

    Likely preparation challenge: higher-quality LLM or agentic outputs may increase latency, cost or safety risk. Prepare a concrete approach to comparing architectures, setting evaluation criteria and making an explicit deployment trade-off.

  • Turning experiments into reliable services

    Likely preparation challenge: rapid prototyping can conflict with the testing, observability, governance and reliability needed in production. Prepare to walk through how you would introduce those controls while preserving a route to iteration.

  • Sharing capabilities across products

    Likely preparation challenge: reusable platform components must serve different product needs without becoming too rigid or too bespoke. Prepare to describe how you would choose common APIs and workflows while coordinating priorities with product and engineering partners.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you design a personalized learning recommendation system?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how learner signals and content information could inform recommendations, and how you would handle limited or changing data. Discuss evaluation beyond engagement, including learning efficacy, because the posting names both as desired outcomes.

When would a knowledge graph improve a learner-intelligence capability?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe what relationships a graph could represent and how you would validate that its structure improves a recommendation or learning experience. Contrast its value and maintenance cost with a simpler data representation.

How would you take a retrieval-augmented generation application into production?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Walk through retrieval, response generation, testing and monitoring, including how you would investigate answers that are inaccurate or poorly supported. Explain trade-offs among answer quality, latency and cost.

How would you decide whether an AI workflow needs an agent?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare an agentic workflow with a simpler, more constrained workflow for a product task. Address how you would evaluate task completion, failure modes, safety and operational complexity before deployment.

How would you select a foundation model and architecture for an AI product?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Propose a representative evaluation against quality, safety, scalability, latency and cost, all named in the posting. Explain how product needs would shape the comparison rather than assuming one model is best for every use case.

How would you build reusable AI services for multiple products?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe API boundaries, testing and versioning for shared capabilities while allowing product-specific needs. Discuss the trade-off between reuse and coupling, and how you would make the services secure and observable.

What would your deployment approach be for a cloud-native AI service?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Connect Python services and testing with CI/CD, containers, orchestration and infrastructure as code, which the posting identifies as relevant practices. Explain how you would promote a prototype to production while managing reliability and rollback risk.

How would you diagnose a production AI system whose quality or latency has worsened?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the signals you would monitor and how you would distinguish changes in inputs, retrieval, models and service performance. Cover immediate mitigation and subsequent evaluation, consistent with the role's ownership of monitoring and continuous improvement.

How would you establish responsible AI and evaluation practices?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would evaluate model outputs, prompts and agent behavior for quality and safety before and after release. Discuss governance and documented trade-offs without assuming the posting specifies a particular policy or evaluation framework.

How might educational measurement inform personalized learning?

What to coverSuggested preparation: If familiar with the posting's preferred areas, explain how proficiency modeling, Bayesian methods or item response theory might help interpret learner progress. Distinguish measured learning efficacy from engagement, and be clear about the evidence needed to validate an approach.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you aligned product and technical partners on an AI opportunity.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use a real situation, your actions and the result to show how you clarified goals across functions such as Product, Engineering or Data Science. Explain how the collaboration affected delivery or the definition of success.

Describe a time you moved an AI experiment toward a production outcome.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Give the situation, what you did to address deployment and operational readiness, and the result. Distinguish prototype findings from evidence of product, learner or business impact.

Tell me about a difficult architecture trade-off you communicated to stakeholders.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the situation, your recommendation and its result, including how you explained competing concerns such as quality, safety, latency or cost. Make your own role in the decision clear without implying there was a risk-free option.

Give an example of how you mentored a technical colleague.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Set out the situation, your specific coaching actions and the observed result. Focus on how you helped improve an engineering or evaluation practice, since mentoring engineers and data scientists is part of the advertised role.

Describe a time you responded to a reliability or quality problem in a deployed system.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain the situation, the actions you took to investigate and coordinate a response, and the result. Include what changed in monitoring, evaluation or operations afterward, where supported by your real example.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • LLM, RAG and agent architecture

    The posting calls for generative AI, retrieval-augmented generation and agentic solutions. As a revision exercise, compare when a learner-facing task would use retrieval, an agentic workflow or neither; explain the quality, safety, latency and cost trade-offs.

  • Recommendations and knowledge graphs

    Pearson names learner intelligence, recommendations, knowledge graphs and personalized learning as production capabilities. Sketch how relationships between learning content and learner needs might inform a recommendation, then identify what evidence would show it improves learning outcomes.

  • Production AI lifecycle

    The role owns experimentation through deployment, monitoring, evaluation and improvement, with MLOps and AIOps practices. Trace a hypothetical model change through those stages, noting versioning, observability, reliability and rollback decisions.

  • Evaluation and responsible AI

    The posting explicitly covers model and agent evaluation, prompt engineering, governance, and optimization for quality, safety, scalability, latency and cost. Draft an evaluation plan with failure cases and thresholds, and explain which trade-offs require stakeholder decisions.

  • Learning-science measurement

    Learning science is a collaboration area; psychometrics, proficiency modeling, Bayesian methods and item response theory are preferred familiarity, not stated requirements. As optional preparation, contrast engagement with learning efficacy and outline how an assessment signal might inform—but not alone prove—a personalization benefit.

Skills to revise

  • Build and test a Python AI API

    Python, APIs, testing, CI/CD and version control are explicit qualifications. Practice implementing a small AI-backed endpoint with input checks and automated tests, then describe how a versioned change would move through CI/CD.

  • Prototype a retrieval or agent workflow

    The role calls for hands-on foundation-model applications and reusable workflows. As a practice exercise, build a small RAG or agentic prototype, record its failure cases, and explain what would need to change before it could serve a Pearson product; no particular listed framework is mandatory.

  • Plan a cloud-native deployment

    The posting specifies AWS or a similar cloud, containerization, orchestration and infrastructure as code. Prepare a deployment design for the prototype showing service boundaries, configuration, scaling and recovery; distinguish the design exercise from any claim about Pearson's actual architecture.

  • Run an evaluation and monitoring pass

    Production monitoring and optimization are explicit duties. Test a small set of representative and adverse inputs, record quality and safety outcomes alongside latency and cost, and propose alerts and a response to degraded results.

  • Explain technical trade-offs across teams

    The role partners with Product, Engineering, Design, Learning Science and Data Science, mentors colleagues, and communicates decisions to stakeholders. Rehearse a brief recommendation between two AI approaches that states expected learner outcome, operational risks, evidence gaps and the decision needed.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map evidence to the required qualifications

    Prepare a one-page inventory of examples covering production AI/ML, cloud-native deployment, MLOps, Python, APIs, testing, CI/CD, containers, orchestration and infrastructure as code. The posting requires these; mark any area without a direct example rather than inventing one.

  • Build a production project walkthrough

    Choose one relevant project, if available, and prepare a concise account of the problem, your decisions, deployment path, monitoring, changes after launch and measured outcomes. Pearson emphasizes taking AI capabilities from experimentation to production impact.

  • Practice a personalized-learning design exercise

    As preparation, sketch an architecture for learner recommendations or a knowledge-graph-supported learning experience. Show data flow, reusable services and APIs, deployment approach, and how you would measure learner engagement or efficacy; this is a practice exercise, not a stated interview task.

  • Prepare an AI evaluation and operations plan

    Draft a sample plan for a RAG or agentic application comparing foundation-model options on quality, safety, latency, scalability and cost. Include evaluation criteria, observability, governance and a response to performance regressions—areas named in the role.

  • Rehearse a cross-functional leadership example

    Prepare an example, if available, of working across product and technical teams or mentoring colleagues. Be ready to explain a strategy, trade-off, risk and outcome to both technical and nontechnical stakeholders.

  • Review relevant learning-domain concepts

    If applicable, prepare a brief example involving personalized learning, assessment or learning science. Psychometrics, proficiency modeling, Bayesian methods and item response theory are preferred familiarity, not stated requirements.

  • Write focused questions for Pearson

    Prepare questions about how the team measures learner outcomes, prioritizes reusable AI platform work, and divides responsibility for evaluation and operations. Ask which work arrangement applies to this role: the description says remote in the United States, while the listing says Atlanta and Hybrid.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Oct 1, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: Nov 4, 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in United States. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…