New opportunity

Senior Researcher, Large Language Models

Tencent · Singapore

About this role

Join Lightspeed Tech Center, the R&D department within Tencent’s LIGHTSPEED STUDIOS, to research and develop large-language-model-powered agents for games. The role is full-time and on-site at Singapore-CapitaSky.

Responsibilities

  • Develop LLM-based agents and optimize their performance.
  • Work with game designers and engineers to integrate agents into live game environments while meeting latency, cost and player-experience requirements.
  • Research LLM reasoning, planning, tool use and memory, and adapt these techniques to game-agent scenarios.

Requirements

  • Familiarity with machine learning foundations, a strong understanding of statistical models and experience with NLP projects.
  • Proficiency in at least one programming language and familiarity with basic data structures and algorithms.

Preferred

  • Published academic research at top-tier AI or NLP conferences, such as ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, EMNLP or ACL.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Large language modelsAI agentsMachine learningStatistical modelsNatural language processingProgrammingData structuresAlgorithmsLLM reasoningPlanningTool useMemoryPerformance optimization

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Build and improve LLM-powered game agents

    The role explicitly calls for developing agents and optimizing their performance. Prepare to explain how you would evaluate an agent, identify weaknesses, and test improvements.

  • Adapt research to game scenarios

    The posting names reasoning, planning, tool use, and memory as research areas to adapt for game agents. Prepare to distinguish a promising technique from one that delivers a useful in-game behavior.

  • Integrate agents into live games

    The researcher works with game designers and engineers to meet latency, cost, and player-experience requirements. Prepare to discuss how research choices change when an agent must fit a live environment.

  • Ground research in technical fundamentals

    The posting asks for machine-learning foundations, statistical-model understanding, NLP project experience, and programming fundamentals; top-tier AI or NLP publications are preferred, not required. Prepare to explain the reasoning and implementation behind relevant research work.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing agent quality against runtime constraints

    Likely preparation challenge, not a reported employer problem: richer reasoning or memory may improve behavior while increasing latency and cost. Prepare a concrete approach to measuring the trade-off alongside player experience.

  • Making research hold up in live gameplay

    Likely preparation challenge: a technique that works in a controlled evaluation may behave differently in a game environment. Prepare to describe how you would test agent behavior in representative game scenarios before judging an adaptation successful.

  • Reconciling research goals with game design

    Likely preparation challenge: technically capable behavior may not create the intended player experience. Prepare to explain how you would use feedback from designers and engineers to refine an agent without losing sight of measurable performance.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you design an LLM-powered agent for a game scenario?

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Describe the agent’s inputs, available actions and decision loop, then explain how you would constrain behavior for the game scenario. Discuss how you would assess whether the design improves player experience without assuming a particular game or architecture.

How would you evaluate an LLM agent’s reasoning?

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Explain how you would test whether decisions follow from the information available to the agent, rather than merely produce plausible text. Address failure cases and the trade-off between more deliberation and response latency.

When would a game agent need planning rather than a single-step response?

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Contrast short-horizon decisions with sequences that require tracking goals and revising a plan. Explain how you would detect and recover from a plan that no longer fits the game state.

How would you decide when an agent should use a tool?

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Discuss which information or actions would need an external interface instead of a model-generated answer. Cover validation of tool results, failure handling and the latency added by tool calls.

What should an LLM game agent remember, and for how long?

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Distinguish immediate context from information worth retaining across interactions. Explain how you would test whether memory helps continuity without introducing stale information, excess cost or inconsistent behavior.

How would you optimize an agent under latency and cost limits?

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Identify where you would measure time and cost across the agent’s decision loop before changing it. Compare possible simplifications against their effects on decision quality and player experience; the posting specifies the constraints, not an optimization method.

How would you integrate and troubleshoot an agent in a live game environment?

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Describe the interfaces and observable behavior you would agree on with game designers and engineers, then how you would isolate an agent, integration or performance failure. Explain how you would limit disruption to player experience while investigating.

How would you evaluate whether an agent change is an improvement?

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Define task-relevant measures for agent behavior alongside latency, cost and player experience. Draw on machine-learning and statistical fundamentals to explain comparison design, uncertainty and why an apparent gain might not generalize.

Where do programming, data structures and algorithms matter in agent performance?

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Walk through an implementation choice in a programming language you know, focusing on how state is stored, updated and retrieved. Explain the time or space trade-offs and how you would verify that the choice matters in practice.

How would you adapt NLP research to a game-agent problem?

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Use an NLP project or research technique you can discuss to explain the problem, evidence and limitations, without assuming you have published work. Show how you would test whether a reasoning, planning, tool-use or memory technique transfers to a game scenario rather than relying on its published results alone.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you worked across research, design and engineering perspectives.

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Give the situation and each group’s priorities, then explain your actions to resolve a concrete disagreement. End with the result and what changed in the work; collaboration with game designers and engineers is stated in the role.

Describe a time you balanced quality against latency or cost.

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Set out the constraint and the options you considered, including how you assessed the effect on users or players. Explain your decision, the measured result and any trade-off that remained.

Tell me about a research idea that did not work as expected.

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Describe the hypothesis, what you tried and the evidence that challenged it. Explain your subsequent action and result, focusing on how you decided whether to revise or stop the approach.

Describe a difficult issue you diagnosed in an integrated system.

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Explain the situation, the signals available and how you worked with others to isolate the cause. State the fix or mitigation and its observed result; use a genuine example rather than assuming prior live-game experience.

Tell me about a time you communicated a technical finding to a different audience.

What to coverSuggested preparation (inferred): Describe the audience and decision they needed to make, then explain how you conveyed evidence, limitations and practical implications. Give the result; a research result or project finding works without assuming a conference publication.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Machine learning and statistical models

    Posting: Familiarity with machine learning foundations and a strong understanding of statistical models are required. Suggested exercise: explain model generalization, uncertainty and evaluation using a small NLP classification example, including how you would detect misleading results.

  • NLP foundations for LLM agents

    Posting: Experience with NLP projects is required, and the role develops LLM-based agents. Suggested exercise: outline how an agent interprets a player's text, maintains context and produces an appropriate response; identify likely language-understanding failure modes.

  • Reasoning and planning in game agents

    Posting: The role researches LLM reasoning and planning for game-agent scenarios. Suggested exercise: sketch how an agent would choose between several in-game actions over multiple steps, then explain where its plan might fail and how you would assess it.

  • Tool use and memory

    Posting: The role researches tool use and memory for game agents. Suggested exercise: compare when an agent should retrieve stored game context, invoke an available game action or answer directly; explain safeguards against stale context and invalid actions.

  • Research assessment and trade-offs

    Posting: The role adapts research techniques to games; publications at leading AI or NLP conferences are preferred. Suggested exercise: summarize one relevant research paper's method, evidence and limitations, then propose a test of its usefulness for game agents. This is preparation advice, not a publication requirement.

Skills to revise

  • Programming and algorithms

    Posting: Proficiency in at least one programming language and familiarity with basic data structures and algorithms are required. Suggested exercise: implement a small agent state manager in a language you know, and explain the complexity of storing and retrieving recent interactions.

  • Agent prototyping

    Posting: Developing LLM-based agents is a core responsibility. Suggested exercise: build a small illustrative game-agent loop that accepts player input, selects an action and records relevant context; explain its limits. This is a practice scenario, not a specified employer project.

  • Latency and cost measurement

    Posting: Live-game integration must meet latency and cost requirements. Suggested exercise: measure response time and per-interaction cost for a sample agent workflow, compare two configurations and document the quality trade-off. The posting specifies no targets or tools.

  • Player-experience evaluation

    Posting: Agent integration must also meet player-experience requirements. Suggested exercise: create test conversations covering confusing requests, repeated interactions and inconsistent agent behavior; define observable pass/fail criteria and record failures.

  • Cross-functional integration planning

    Posting: The researcher collaborates with game designers and engineers to integrate agents into live games. Suggested exercise: draft a brief handoff specifying agent inputs, permitted outputs, failure behavior and questions to resolve with designers and engineers. This is a suggested preparation exercise, not a stated company process.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Prepare an LLM-agent project walkthrough

    Choose a relevant project, if available, and summarize the agent’s objective, architecture, your contributions, results and limitations. The role calls for developing and optimizing LLM-based agents for games.

  • Draft a game-agent design exercise

    Sketch a hypothetical agent for a live game: its inputs, actions, boundaries and integration points with game systems. Explain how you would work through design choices with game designers and engineers; this is preparation, not a stated interview exercise.

  • Build a performance trade-off sheet

    For the hypothetical design, propose how you would measure latency, cost and player experience, and identify trade-offs you would test. These are explicit constraints in the role.

  • Compare research approaches for game agents

    Prepare a short comparison of reasoning, planning, tool use and memory approaches, including one experiment to test an approach in a game-agent scenario. The posting names all four research areas.

  • Gather evidence for the stated technical requirements

    Select examples that demonstrate machine-learning foundations, statistical-model reasoning, NLP project work, proficiency in one programming language, and use of basic data structures and algorithms. Be ready to explain decisions rather than just list tools.

  • Summarize research outputs, if applicable

    Prepare concise accounts of any relevant publications or other research results and your contribution to each. Top-tier AI or NLP conference publication is preferred, not required.

  • Write questions for the hiring team

    Ask how Lightspeed Tech Center chooses game-agent research problems, evaluates player experience alongside latency and cost, and coordinates integration with designers and engineers. These questions follow from the advertised responsibilities, not a stated company process.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 4 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in Singapore. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…