New opportunity

Applied Machine Learning Engineer, Singapore

Fireworks · Singapore

About this role

Fireworks is hiring an Applied Machine Learning Engineer in Singapore to turn AI research into customer-facing applications. This hands-on role develops, fine-tunes and operationalizes machine learning models, with a focus on scalable solutions that deliver business value and improve user experiences.

Responsibilities

  • Work with Account Executives and Solutions Architects to integrate and deploy ML solutions for customers. Build and present demonstrations and proofs of concept, and design, develop and deploy end-to-end AI applications tailored to customer needs.
  • Add features to the internal ML platform, fix issues, and enable new models in the platform or customer environments. Improve the performance, efficiency and scalability of deployed models and applications.
  • Collaborate with partners to enable joint AI solutions.

Required qualifications

  • Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, Engineering or a related technical field, plus at least 5 years of software engineering experience. Customer-facing experience is strongly preferred.
  • Strong coding skills; ability to lead complex technical projects focused on customer success; and strong interpersonal and communication skills for cross-functional work. Python proficiency is preferred.

Preferred qualifications

  • Master’s degree in Computer Science, Engineering or a related technical field; experience in a startup or fast-paced environment.
  • Hands-on model fine-tuning experience, including supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF or RFT), plus an understanding of generative AI, machine learning principles and enterprise infrastructure.

The position is full-time in Singapore. Compensation is SGD 150K–191K per year, with equity offered.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Machine LearningSoftware EngineeringPythonModel Fine-TuningSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)RFTGenerative AIModel DeploymentModel ServingPerformance OptimizationProof of Concept DevelopmentCustomer SuccessTechnical Project LeadershipCross-functional CollaborationEnterprise Infrastructure

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Customer deployment

    Work with Account Executives and Solutions Architects to integrate and deploy ML solutions for customers. The role calls for leading complex technical projects with a focus on customer success.

  • Proofs of concept and applications

    Build and present PoCs, then design, develop, and deploy end-to-end AI applications tailored to customer needs.

  • Models in production

    Develop, fine-tune, and operationalize models that deliver business value and improve user experiences. Hands-on SFT and RLHF or RFT experience is preferred, not required.

  • Platform and model enablement

    Add features and resolve issues in the internal ML platform, and enable new models in the platform or customer environments.

  • Performance at scale

    Improve the performance, efficiency, and scalability of deployed models and applications; the posting also highlights low-latency inference and scalable model serving.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Turning a PoC into a deployed application

    Likely preparation challenge, not a confirmed employer problem: a compelling demo may need different engineering decisions from a customer deployment. Prepare to explain how you would define a PoC's scope, validate its value, and identify what must change before deployment.

  • Balancing customer needs with platform work

    Likely preparation challenge: tailored applications and customer-environment integrations may compete with reusable platform features and bug fixes. Prepare a framework for deciding what belongs in the shared platform versus a customer-specific implementation.

  • Trading off model quality and serving performance

    Likely preparation challenge: fine-tuning and new-model enablement must coexist with efficiency, scalability, and low-latency serving goals. Prepare to describe how you would measure application quality alongside deployment performance and choose among trade-offs.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you scope a customer proof of concept for an AI use case?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would identify the customer need, choose a representative demonstration, and agree on criteria for judging its value. Distinguish what a PoC can demonstrate from what still needs validation before deployment.

How would you design an end-to-end AI application tailored to a customer?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Walk through the application components from customer inputs and model interaction to outputs and deployment. Explain how you would balance usefulness, reliability, and maintainability as needs evolve.

When would you fine-tune a model using supervised fine-tuning?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss the quality and relevance of training examples, the desired behavior change, and a baseline for comparison. Explain how you would check whether gains on representative tasks justify the added complexity.

How would you compare SFT with RLHF or RFT for improving a model?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain the different feedback or training signals each approach needs and the kinds of objectives they might address. Discuss evaluation, data quality, and implementation cost rather than assuming one method is always preferable.

How would you evaluate a generative AI model for a customer application?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe how to test representative inputs, output quality, and failure cases against the customer's intended use. Explain how you would weigh quality against deployment performance and avoid treating a strong demo as sufficient evidence.

What would you check before enabling a new model in a platform or customer environment?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Address interface compatibility, expected model behavior, serving needs, and how to validate the integration. Explain how you would handle a trade-off between introducing new capabilities and keeping existing applications stable.

How would you diagnose a slow deployed model or AI application?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe how you would locate the bottleneck across application logic and model serving before changing the system. Discuss latency, throughput, efficiency, and the risk that an optimization could reduce output quality.

How would you investigate a bug in an internal ML platform?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would reproduce the issue, narrow its cause, test a fix, and guard against regressions. Show how you would prioritize a customer-impacting issue while keeping the platform dependable.

How would you integrate an ML solution into a customer's enterprise environment?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss how you would clarify the customer's existing workflows and infrastructure constraints with the relevant stakeholders. Explain how you would validate the integration and plan for a smooth deployment without assuming a particular technology stack.

How would you structure Python code for an AI application that may move from PoC to production?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Python is preferred in the posting, so use it as one possible example of clear interfaces, testing, and error handling. Explain which shortcuts are reasonable for a PoC and which should be addressed before deployment.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you worked with commercial and technical colleagues to deploy a solution for a customer.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Give the situation and your specific actions in aligning customer needs with the work of colleagues such as account or solution teams. Describe the deployment result and what you learned from any gaps between expectations and delivery.

Describe a complex technical project you led with a customer outcome in mind.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Set out the situation, your decisions about priorities and ownership, and how you handled technical obstacles. State the result in terms you can substantiate rather than claiming an impact you cannot evidence.

Tell me about a time you presented a technical demonstration to an audience with different levels of expertise.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain the situation, how you adapted the presentation and addressed questions, and what happened afterward. Include how you communicated limitations as well as capabilities.

Describe a time you collaborated with an external partner on a joint technical solution.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Give a real example of how you clarified responsibilities and resolved a coordination challenge. Explain your actions and the outcome, including what you would change next time.

Tell me about a time priorities changed during a fast-moving engineering project.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the situation, how you assessed the impact on users or customers, and how you communicated and adjusted your work. Close with the result and the trade-off you made.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Generative AI and model selection

    Review how to choose and evaluate a model for a customer use case; compare two hypothetical options on output quality, latency and fit. The posting prefers understanding of generative AI and ML principles, and describes text, image, embedding, audio and multimodal workloads.

  • Fine-tuning approaches

    Explain when supervised fine-tuning (SFT) versus RLHF or RFT might be appropriate, including the feedback and evaluation each would need. Hands-on experience with these approaches is preferred, not a minimum qualification.

  • Model serving trade-offs

    Work through a serving design and explain how latency, efficiency and scalability affect one another. Improving deployed performance is a responsibility; the page also highlights low-latency inference and scalable model serving.

  • Enterprise integration and customer success

    Sketch the decisions involved in taking a customer need from integration through deployment, including how to define success with Account Executives and Solutions Architects. The role explicitly combines customer-facing delivery with enterprise infrastructure knowledge, which is preferred.

  • Technical project leadership

    Outline how you would sequence a complex customer-focused project, handle a change in requirements and communicate a trade-off to engineering and customer-facing colleagues. Leading such projects and working across teams are minimum qualifications.

Skills to revise

  • Code a platform change

    Practice implementing a small ML-platform feature or bug fix, with a focused test and a clear explanation of the change. The role includes platform features and fixes; robust coding is required, while Python proficiency is preferred.

  • Build an end-to-end AI application

    As a preparation exercise, design and implement a small application around a defined customer need, then explain how you would deploy it. Designing, developing and deploying customer-tailored AI applications is an explicit responsibility.

  • Present a proof of concept

    Prepare a short demonstration with a stated customer problem, observable result and limitations; rehearse explaining it to both technical and customer-facing colleagues. Building and presenting PoCs is an explicit responsibility.

  • Enable a new model

    Practice planning and testing the steps to integrate a model into an existing application or platform, including how you would detect a failed integration. Enabling new models in the platform or customer environments is a stated responsibility; this exercise does not assume a particular tool.

  • Measure and improve deployed performance

    Define a baseline for latency and efficiency, propose one change, and compare the results while checking that application behavior still meets the need. The posting explicitly calls for improving performance, efficiency and scalability of deployed models and applications.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map evidence to the minimum qualifications

    Prepare a one-page record of relevant education, software engineering experience, coding work, and complex projects led. The posting requires a related bachelor’s degree and 5+ years in software engineering; Python and customer-facing experience are preferred.

  • Rehearse a customer-focused project walkthrough

    If you have a relevant example, outline the customer need, your technical decisions, collaborators, deployment, and measured outcome. Otherwise, prepare a clearly hypothetical scenario. The role involves customer success and working with Account Executives and Solutions Architects.

  • Prepare a proof-of-concept presentation

    Sketch a short AI demo with a customer use case, what it shows, how you would evaluate it, and what remains before deployment. Building and presenting PoCs is an advertised responsibility; the demo is a preparation exercise, not a stated interview requirement.

  • Practice an end-to-end application design

    Draft a diagram covering model choice, application integration, deployment, and evaluation for a hypothetical customer need. Be ready to explain trade-offs for scalability and enterprise infrastructure without assuming Fireworks uses a particular architecture.

  • Explain a model-enablement or platform change

    Prepare a technical walkthrough, using a real example if available, of integrating a new model or diagnosing a platform issue. Include tests, rollout considerations, and how you would identify regressions; both model enablement and platform fixes appear in the role.

  • Quantify a performance improvement

    Bring before-and-after measurements from relevant work if available, or outline how you would measure latency, efficiency, and scalability. Explain the trade-offs you would investigate for deployed models and applications.

  • Review fine-tuning decisions

    Prepare a concise comparison of supervised fine-tuning and RLHF or RFT, including when each might be appropriate and how you would evaluate results. Hands-on experience with these methods is preferred, not listed as a minimum qualification.

  • Draft questions for the employer

    Prepare questions about how customer PoCs become deployed applications, how platform and customer-environment work is divided, and how engineers collaborate with partners and the GTM team. These topics come from the advertised responsibilities.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 4 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in Singapore. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…