New opportunity

Principal Applied AI App Engineer

Mastercard · Pune, India

About this role

Mastercard’s Global Business Solution Center (GBSC) Tech team seeks a Principal Applied AI App Engineer to help steer and implement its AI strategy. The role leads the design of AI-based solutions and builds production-grade applications that embed machine learning and generative AI capabilities in the payments-industry business environment. The position is based in Pune, India, and is full-time at 40 hours per week.

Responsibilities

  • Design and develop AI applications; integrate trained machine learning, deep learning and LLM-based models into APIs, services, workflows and user interfaces. Collaborate with Data Science and ML Engineering teams to operationalize prebuilt models.
  • Support model versioning, deployment, monitoring and production updates. Implement guardrails for model behavior, data quality and responsible AI use, including bias mitigation and explainability where applicable.
  • Ensure applications meet enterprise security, privacy, compliance and ethical AI standards; follow secure coding and access-control practices. Advise on AI technology adoption, keep current with emerging engineering techniques and mentor team members.

Required capabilities:

  • Advanced expertise integrating generative AI, LLMs, prompt engineering and RAG architectures into business applications, plus extensive experience deploying production-grade AI applications with evaluation, observability and monitoring.
  • Strong software engineering experience with Python, Java, C# or similar languages; familiarity with AWS, Azure or GCP and containerized deployments; and a solid understanding of data structures, algorithms and system design.
  • Experience advising on AI roadmaps and technology adoption, attention to detail and an interest in automation and emerging technologies.

Desirable capabilities: Fluency in finance processes and leadership skills; strong communication with senior leaders and executives; and experience coordinating plans and execution across time zones on a global team.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Generative AILarge Language ModelsMachine LearningDeep LearningPrompt EngineeringRAGPythonJavaC#AWSAzureGoogle Cloud PlatformAPIsModel DeploymentModel MonitoringModel EvaluationObservabilityContainerizationData StructuresAlgorithmsSystem DesignResponsible AIBias MitigationExplainabilityData QualitySecure CodingAccess ControlAI StrategyMentoringCommunication

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Lead AI application design

    The role is the GBSC design lead for AI solutions and builds production-grade applications. Prepare to explain architectural decisions that turn business needs into maintainable services and workflows.

  • Integrate models into business applications

    The posting calls for embedding ML, deep-learning and LLM-based models in APIs, services, workflows and UIs, with advanced generative AI and RAG expertise. Prepare concrete integration examples, including why an approach suited the application.

  • Own production readiness

    The role supports model versioning, deployment, monitoring and updates, and calls for evaluation and observability. Prepare to discuss how an AI application is evaluated before release and monitored after deployment.

  • Build within enterprise safeguards

    Applications must meet security, privacy, compliance and ethical AI standards, with guardrails for model behavior and data quality. Prepare to explain access controls, secure coding and when bias mitigation or explainability applies.

  • Guide adoption and develop others

    The role helps steer GBSC’s AI strategy, advises on technology adoption and mentors team members. Prepare examples of how to assess an emerging technique, communicate a recommendation and share engineering practices.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing generative AI utility with predictable behavior

    A likely design challenge is making LLM or RAG features useful without accepting unreliable outputs. Prepare to discuss evaluation criteria, grounding and behavioral guardrails, including what you would do when results fall short.

  • Coordinating model-to-application changes

    Because the role operationalizes prebuilt models with Data Science and ML Engineering, handoffs may complicate versioning and production updates. Prepare an approach to interface contracts, testing, monitoring and rollback.

  • Adopting new techniques without weakening controls

    Steering AI adoption while meeting enterprise security, privacy and compliance standards may require trading speed against assurance. Prepare to explain how you would compare a new technique with an established option and present the decision to stakeholders.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you design an application that embeds a prebuilt AI model in APIs, workflows and a user interface?

What to coverSuggested focus: Explain service boundaries, model integration, failure handling and how the application would remain reliable as usage grows. Distinguish application engineering decisions from model work you would coordinate with Data Science and ML Engineering.

When would you use RAG in a business application, and how would you design it?

What to coverSuggested focus: Walk through retrieval, context selection and answer generation, including how you would assess whether retrieved material supports an answer. Discuss trade-offs in relevance, latency and access to source data.

How would you develop prompts and control unwanted LLM behavior?

What to coverSuggested focus: Describe prompt iteration against representative tasks and guardrails for outputs that are unsupported or inappropriate. Explain how you would test changes rather than relying on a few successful examples.

How would you evaluate an AI application before and after deployment?

What to coverSuggested focus: Separate model or response quality from application measures such as reliability and latency. Explain how representative evaluation cases, regression checks and production feedback would inform release decisions.

How would you investigate declining AI application quality in production?

What to coverSuggested focus: Describe the signals you would monitor and how you would narrow the cause across input data, retrieval, model behavior and application changes. Include how observability would help you decide whether to correct, revert or further investigate.

How would you manage model versions and production updates?

What to coverSuggested focus: Explain how you would track the model and application versions serving a request, validate a proposed update and preserve a path to rollback. Discuss the trade-off between shipping improvements and maintaining dependable behavior.

How would you protect sensitive information in an AI-enabled application?

What to coverSuggested focus: Address secure coding, access control and privacy across inputs, model calls, outputs and logs. Explain how you would check an application design against enterprise security and compliance requirements without assuming a particular company policy or tool.

How would you address data quality, bias and explainability in an AI application?

What to coverSuggested focus: Describe checks for unsuitable inputs and outputs, and when bias assessment or explanations would be useful. Clarify what the application can enforce directly and what requires collaboration with model-owning teams.

What would you consider when deploying a containerized AI service on a cloud platform?

What to coverSuggested focus: Discuss configuration, scalability, reliability and monitoring without assuming a specific cloud provider. Explain how deployment choices affect operational effort and the ability to update the service safely.

How would you diagnose a performance bottleneck in an AI-backed API?

What to coverSuggested focus: Separate time spent in application code, data access and model calls before choosing an optimization. Discuss relevant system-design or algorithmic trade-offs, such as concurrency and resource use, while preserving response quality.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you helped set a technical roadmap or advised on adopting an emerging technology.

What to coverSuggested focus: Use a real situation, your assessment of benefits and risks, the advice you gave and the result. Make clear how you handled uncertainty rather than presenting adoption as an end in itself.

Describe a time you worked with data science or ML engineering partners to put a model into an application.

What to coverSuggested focus: Set out the shared goal, how you agreed on responsibilities and resolved an integration issue, and the result. Identify your own actions without claiming the model team's work as yours.

Give an example of how you mentored engineers on a technical practice.

What to coverSuggested focus: Explain the capability gap, what you did to share knowledge or review work, and what changed. Use a concrete result rather than a general statement about mentoring.

Tell me about a time you explained a technical trade-off to senior leaders.

What to coverSuggested focus: Describe the decision, how you made options and risks understandable, and the resulting decision or next step. Be clear about what you recommended and what others decided.

Describe a time you coordinated execution with colleagues across time zones.

What to coverSuggested focus: Explain the situation, how you communicated plans and managed handoffs, and the result. Highlight a specific coordination challenge and the action you took to address it.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • RAG and prompt-engineering design

    The posting explicitly calls for advanced expertise integrating LLMs, prompts and RAG into business applications. For revision, sketch a RAG architecture and explain how retrieval quality, prompt design and model behavior affect its answers.

  • Production AI system design

    The role designs production-grade applications and calls for data structures, algorithms and system design. For revision, diagram how a prebuilt model would connect to an API, service, workflow and UI; explain reliability and scaling tradeoffs.

  • Model lifecycle and evaluation

    The posting names model versioning, deployment, updates, evaluation, observability and monitoring. For revision, outline what to evaluate before release, what to monitor afterward and when an updated model should be reviewed.

  • Responsible AI and enterprise controls

    The role calls for guardrails, data quality, security, privacy, compliance and ethical AI use, with bias mitigation and explainability where applicable. For revision, work through a hypothetical unsafe or inaccurate output and explain which controls would detect or limit it.

  • AI adoption and technical leadership

    The posting calls for advising on AI roadmaps and technology adoption and mentoring colleagues; finance-process fluency and executive communication are desirable. For revision, compare two hypothetical AI use cases and explain how you would prioritize them and communicate the tradeoffs.

Skills to revise

  • Integrate a model into an application

    The role integrates trained ML, deep-learning or LLM models into APIs, services, workflows and UIs, in collaboration with Data Science and ML Engineering. As practice, use Python, Java or C# to sketch an API wrapper for a prebuilt model, including inputs, outputs and error handling.

  • Prototype and test a RAG flow

    RAG and prompt engineering are explicit requirements. As practice, build a small retrieval-to-answer flow and test how changes to retrieved context and prompts affect answer quality; this is a revision exercise, not a stated Mastercard project.

  • Plan a production update

    The role supports versioning, deployment, monitoring and production updates; familiarity with cloud platforms and containerized deployments is requested. As practice, outline a containerized deployment update with a version identifier, evaluation checks and monitoring signals.

  • Implement application safeguards

    The posting explicitly mentions model-behavior and data-quality guardrails, secure coding and access control. As practice, add input validation, an access check and a defined response for unacceptable model output to a sample AI API.

  • Present an adoption recommendation

    Advising on AI roadmaps is requested, while communication with senior leaders is desirable. As practice, deliver a brief recommendation for a hypothetical AI application, covering expected value, operational risks and what would need evaluation before adoption.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Prepare an AI application walkthrough

    Choose a real project you can discuss. Show how prompts or RAG and a trained model were integrated into an API, workflow, or UI; distinguish your decisions from the Data Science and ML Engineering teams’ work.

  • Sketch a production system design

    Create a hypothetical architecture for a GBSC AI application, showing service boundaries, access control, a containerized deployment, and scalability choices. Be ready to explain relevant data-structure and algorithm trade-offs; do not present the exercise as a Mastercard project.

  • Gather evidence of production operation

    Prepare specific examples of model versioning, deployment, evaluation, observability, monitoring, and updates. Explain the signals used to detect problems and what actions followed.

  • Map safeguards to failure modes

    Make a short table linking model behavior and data-quality risks to guardrails. Include security and privacy controls, plus bias mitigation or explainability where applicable to your example.

  • Develop a leadership and strategy account

    Prepare one account of advising an AI roadmap or technology choice, including trade-offs and outcomes. Identify how you communicated with senior stakeholders, mentored colleagues, or coordinated across time zones where you have relevant examples.

  • Draft questions for the team

    Ask how GBSC prioritizes AI opportunities, how app engineers collaborate with Data Science and ML Engineering, and how the team evaluates production applications against security, privacy, and responsible-AI expectations. Ask which finance processes matter most to this role.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 5 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…