New opportunity

AI Engineering Lead-VP

Barclays · Pune, India

About this role

Barclays seeks an AI Engineering Lead-VP in Pune to lead the evolution of its ML/AI infrastructure, platform services and deployment pipelines. The role builds and manages scalable, secure infrastructure for ML, generative AI and agentic workloads while leading engineering teams to deliver high-quality software solutions.

Responsibilities

  • Lead and develop high-performing technical teams, provide guidance and mentorship, conduct performance reviews, and foster collaboration and technical excellence.
  • Oversee delivery timelines, team allocation, priorities, budgets and risks. Improve engineering processes, tools and workflows; enforce technology standards, peer reviews and testing practices.
  • Work with security, governance, architecture, product, business and other stakeholders to translate requirements into technical solutions. Contribute to strategy and continuous improvement, advise senior stakeholders, and strengthen risk management and controls.

Required experience and approach:

  • Hands-on experience designing, building and maintaining AWS platforms for AI workloads, with exposure to CI/CD pipelines and Infrastructure as Code deployments.
  • Experience navigating complex enterprises, working across security, governance, architecture and business teams, and building high-performing technical teams.
  • A product-oriented approach focused on outcomes, scalability, self-service capabilities and user experience; comfort using AI development tools such as Claude Code with structured rules and reusable patterns.

Highly valued experience includes building ML models, developing generative AI applications and working iteratively in Agile environments. The position is permanent and full-time. Barclays describes a hybrid working approach with fixed on-site anchor days set by the business area; applicants should discuss the role’s working pattern with the hiring manager. Listed benefits include a competitive holiday allowance, life assurance, private medical care and a pension contribution.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

AWSAI infrastructureMachine learningGenerative AIAgentic systemsCI/CDInfrastructure as CodeClaude CodeAI platform engineeringML model developmentAgileSecurity governanceRisk managementEngineering leadershipStakeholder management

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Evolve the AWS AI platform

    The role calls for hands-on leadership in designing, building and maintaining scalable, secure AWS infrastructure for ML, generative AI and agentic workloads, alongside platform services and deployment pipelines.

  • Treat the platform as a product

    Barclays explicitly emphasizes outcomes, scalability, self-service, continuous evolution and user experience. Focus on how platform decisions serve users and business objectives, not just technical delivery.

  • Lead teams and delivery

    The accountabilities include building high-performing teams, mentoring and performance feedback, and managing timelines, allocation, priorities, risks and budgets. VP expectations also include strategic and resource planning.

  • Align stakeholders and strengthen controls

    The role works across security, governance, architecture, product and business teams to turn requirements into solutions. It also calls for advising senior stakeholders and taking accountability for risk and controls.

  • Raise engineering quality and efficiency

    Barclays calls for improved processes and workflows, technology standards, peer reviews and robust testing. It also mentions CI/CD, Infrastructure as Code and structured, reusable patterns when using AI development tools such as Claude Code.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Self-service versus governance

    A likely trade-off is making AI infrastructure easy to use while meeting security and control needs; the posting does not identify a specific current problem. Prepare to explain how you would involve governance partners, define appropriate guardrails and assess residual risk.

  • Shared platform versus varied AI workloads

    ML, generative AI and agentic systems may have different deployment and operational needs. Prepare to discuss where reusable platform services make sense, where workload-specific choices may be necessary, and how you would evaluate those alternatives.

  • Delivery pace versus sustainable quality

    Timelines and budgets may compete with testing, standards and team development; this is a preparation hypothesis, not a reported issue at Barclays. Prepare an approach to prioritizing work, making trade-offs visible to stakeholders and protecting critical controls.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you design an AWS platform that supports ML, generative AI and agentic workloads?

What to coverSuggested focus: explain which capabilities should be shared and where workloads may need different deployment or operating approaches. Discuss scalability, security and maintainability without assuming a particular AWS service is required.

How would you use CI/CD and Infrastructure as Code to change an AI platform safely?

What to coverSuggested focus: describe how you would review, test, deploy and recover from changes to infrastructure and workloads. Explain the trade-off between delivery speed and control in a complex enterprise.

How would you turn security and governance requirements into platform controls?

What to coverSuggested focus: describe how you would work with security, governance and architecture stakeholders to clarify requirements and assess risks. Explain how you would make controls practical for engineering teams and escalate a breach.

How would you investigate a failing AI deployment pipeline or unreliable platform service?

What to coverSuggested focus: walk through how you would narrow down the failure, restore service and verify the fix. Include how you would use the incident to improve testing, deployment practices or operational visibility.

How would you design self-service AI platform capabilities around user outcomes?

What to coverSuggested focus: explain how you would learn what platform users need and reduce friction while retaining appropriate controls. Discuss how you would assess adoption, user experience and scalability as the service evolves.

How would you set engineering standards for software delivered by multiple teams?

What to coverSuggested focus: address peer reviews, testing practices and clear ownership of quality. Explain how you would distinguish useful standards from process that slows delivery without improving outcomes.

How would you use an AI development tool such as Claude Code within an engineering team?

What to coverSuggested focus: discuss structured rules and reusable patterns, which the posting explicitly mentions. As a preparation suggestion, explain how you would review generated work for correctness, maintainability and security rather than treating it as automatically ready to deploy.

What would you consider when supporting teams that build ML models or generative AI applications?

What to coverSuggested focus: these are highly valued skills, not stated platform prerequisites. Discuss how development, evaluation and deployment needs might inform platform services, while distinguishing application concerns from platform responsibilities.

How would you evaluate platform support for agentic workloads?

What to coverSuggested focus: agentic systems are explicitly named among the AI workloads. As a preparation suggestion, discuss how to test interactions and constrain actions, and what operational trade-offs arise compared with less autonomous workloads.

How would you choose between competing improvements to the AI platform?

What to coverSuggested focus: compare expected user and business outcomes with delivery effort, scalability, risk and budget. Explain how you would present a recommendation and its trade-offs to senior stakeholders.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you developed a high-performing technical team.

What to coverUse a real situation, your actions and the result. Suggested focus: how you set expectations, coached people or gave actionable feedback, and what changed in team performance.

Describe a time you aligned stakeholders with conflicting technical and business priorities.

What to coverUse a real situation, your actions and the result. Suggested focus: how you listened to security, governance, architecture or business perspectives, negotiated trade-offs and reached a decision.

Tell me about a time you identified and addressed a delivery risk or control weakness.

What to coverUse a real situation, your actions and the result. Suggested focus: how you assessed the impact, involved the right stakeholders, escalated when needed and verified the response.

Describe a time you delivered under competing schedule, staffing and budget constraints.

What to coverUse a real situation, your actions and the result. Suggested focus: how you prioritised work, allocated capacity and communicated what could or could not be delivered.

Tell me about a process or technology change you led across an engineering group.

What to coverUse a real situation, your actions and the result. Suggested focus: why change was needed, how you brought colleagues along and how you assessed whether the change improved delivery or quality.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • AI workload architecture

    The posting explicitly covers AWS platforms for ML, generative AI and agentic workloads. Revise by comparing the infrastructure, deployment and security considerations of each workload in a one-page decision table.

  • Platform-as-product thinking

    The role calls for outcomes, scalability, self-service, continuous evolution and user experience. Revise by defining a hypothetical platform user, their self-service journey and three measures of whether the platform improves their experience.

  • Enterprise risk and controls

    The posting emphasizes security, governance, risk assessment, controls and escalation of policy breaches. Revise by tracing a hypothetical AI platform change from stakeholder requirements through risk review, approval and escalation, noting where decisions need evidence.

  • VP-level engineering delivery

    The role includes strategy, resource and budget planning, prioritization, mentoring and performance feedback. Revise by working through a scenario with competing delivery deadlines and limited capacity; explain the trade-offs, risks and how you would communicate the decision.

  • Engineering quality and change

    The accountabilities include technology standards, peer reviews, testing and improving engineering workflows. Revise by outlining review and testing criteria for a platform change, then identify one process improvement and how its effect could be measured.

Skills to revise

  • Design an AWS AI platform

    Hands-on AWS platform design and maintenance are explicit requirements. Sketch a scalable, secure platform for a hypothetical AI workload; annotate deployment boundaries, operational responsibilities and the architectural trade-offs you would defend.

  • Plan an automated deployment

    The posting specifies exposure to CI/CD pipelines and Infrastructure as Code deployments. Draft a sample change flow from infrastructure definition through review, testing, deployment and rollback, including where controls would be checked.

  • Translate cross-functional requirements

    The role works across security, governance, architecture, product and business stakeholders. Practice turning a short hypothetical business request into technical requirements, open questions, risks and a concise recommendation for senior stakeholders.

  • Coach and allocate an engineering team

    Building high-performing teams, mentoring, performance reviews and team allocation are stated responsibilities. Rehearse giving specific feedback on a hypothetical design review, then allocate a small team across two competing priorities and explain your reasoning.

  • Apply structured AI-tool rules

    The posting names Claude Code and structured rules and reusable patterns for accelerating development. Draft rules for a small platform-code change, use them in a trial if the tool is available, and inspect the proposed changes against review and testing criteria.

  • Prototype an AI application

    Building ML models and developing generative AI applications are described as highly valued, not essential. As optional preparation, build or outline a small example and explain how you would test it and deploy it through the platform.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Build an AWS platform walkthrough

    Prepare a diagram and concise account of an AI workload platform you worked on, covering your decisions, contribution, scale, security and operational outcomes. The role calls for hands-on AWS experience supporting ML, GenAI or agentic workloads.

  • Practice a platform design exercise

    As interview practice, sketch a scalable, secure AWS platform that takes an AI workload from development to deployment. Explain trade-offs, likely risks and how platform services could support self-service; do not assume Barclays uses a particular architecture.

  • Collect delivery and quality evidence

    Prepare specific examples of CI/CD and Infrastructure as Code deployments, plus peer review, testing or engineering-process improvements. Note what changed and any measurable result you can substantiate.

  • Outline a product-oriented platform plan

    Draft a short, hypothetical plan with user needs, desired outcomes, incremental priorities and ways to assess scalability and user experience. The posting emphasizes self-service, continuous evolution and business alignment.

  • Rehearse a team-leadership example

    Choose an example showing how you developed engineers while managing priorities, allocation, timelines, budget or delivery risk. Be ready to explain decisions, feedback given and outcomes without implying a particular team structure for this role.

  • Map a stakeholder and controls decision

    Prepare a case in which you worked across security, governance, architecture and business stakeholders to resolve competing requirements. Show how you assessed risk, strengthened controls and advised decision-makers.

  • Prepare an AI-assisted development example

    If applicable, show how you used a tool such as Claude Code with structured rules or reusable patterns, including review safeguards. Separately identify any ML-model, GenAI-application or iterative Agile experience; the posting describes these as highly valued, not mandatory.

  • Write questions for the hiring manager

    Bring questions about current platform priorities, success measures, team leadership scope, security and governance decision-making, and the Pune role’s fixed on-site anchor days. These clarify details the posting does not settle.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 5 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…