New opportunity

AI Developer

Mvue · Pune, India

About this role

Mvue is seeking an AI Developer in Pune, India, to build Python applications and agentic AI workflows for its autonomous digital-employee platform. The role includes technical leadership, mentoring junior developers, and working with cross-functional teams to align solutions with business needs.

Responsibilities

  • Build and maintain scalable Python applications and services. Develop production-ready agentic AI workflows and multi-model RAG pipelines, including LangGraph-based workflows and MCP-based, low-latency tool integrations.
  • Lead technical design and code reviews, apply engineering best practices, and collaborate with teams to define requirements.
  • Troubleshoot, optimize, and test applications for reliability and performance; maintain documentation and drive continuous improvement.

Requirements

  • 3–7 years of Python development experience and solid object-oriented programming skills.
  • Experience with Django, Flask, or FastAPI; RESTful APIs; system architecture and software design patterns; and SQL databases such as PostgreSQL or MySQL.
  • Familiarity with AWS or Azure, Docker, and Python data libraries including Pandas, NumPy, and Scikit-learn. Strong debugging, analytical, problem-solving, data-integration, learning, and communication abilities.

Preferred

Exposure to NoSQL databases is a plus.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

PythonAgentic AIRAGLangGraphModel Context Protocol (MCP)Object-oriented programmingDjangoFlaskFastAPIRESTful APIsSystem architectureSoftware design patternsSQLPostgreSQLMySQLNoSQLAWSAzureDockerPandasNumPyScikit-learnDebuggingTechnical leadershipCode reviewCommunication

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Production agentic AI and RAG

    The role calls for production-ready agentic workflows, multi-model RAG pipelines, LangGraph-based workflows, and MCP-based low-latency tool integrations. Prepare to explain design choices and how you test workflow behavior.

  • Scalable Python services

    Building and maintaining Python applications and services is a core duty. The page also calls for OOP, REST APIs, web frameworks, system architecture, design patterns, and SQL experience. Prepare an architecture example that shows how these fit together.

  • Reliability and performance

    Troubleshooting, optimization, and testing are explicit responsibilities. Prepare a concrete example of diagnosing a failure or bottleneck, measuring the result, and preventing recurrence.

  • Technical leadership and business alignment

    The position overview calls for leading initiatives and mentoring junior developers; duties include technical design, code reviews, requirements collaboration, and documentation. Prepare examples of explaining trade-offs and reaching an agreed design across teams.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Latency versus workflow depth

    A likely design tension, not a stated employer problem: multi-model RAG and agentic steps can add time to MCP-based tool integrations that the page says should be low-latency. Prepare to discuss where you would measure latency, simplify steps, and test the effect on answer quality.

  • Dependable behavior across data sources

    A plausible challenge is keeping workflows reliable while integrating diverse data sources, both of which the page mentions. Prepare to discuss data validation, failure handling, and tests for retrieval and tool responses without assuming a particular production incident.

  • Balancing delivery with review and mentoring

    The role combines hands-on development with design leadership, code reviews, and mentoring. Prepare to describe how you would prioritize implementation work while maintaining review quality and helping junior developers progress; the page does not specify a team structure.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you structure a scalable Python service using object-oriented design?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain how you would separate responsibilities, manage dependencies, and keep components maintainable as usage grows. Discuss a design trade-off rather than assuming one pattern fits every service.

How would you design a RESTful API in Django, Flask, or FastAPI?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Cover request validation, clear resource boundaries, error handling, and testing. Explain how the framework choice would depend on the service’s needs.

How would you evaluate an architecture before approving its technical design?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe how you would check requirements, component boundaries, scalability, and maintainability. Be ready to explain what feedback you would raise in a design or code review.

How would you design SQL access for a service that must remain reliable as data grows?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Discuss schema design, query performance, transactions, and how you would investigate a slow query in PostgreSQL or MySQL. NoSQL is listed only as a plus, so treat it as an optional comparison where relevant.

How would you evaluate a multi-model RAG pipeline for production use?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain how you would assess retrieval quality, answer quality, latency, and failure cases across the pipeline. Discuss how those results would inform model and pipeline trade-offs without assuming a particular model stack.

How would you structure an agentic workflow using a graph-style approach such as LangGraph?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe how you would represent steps, state, decision points, and failure handling. Explain how you would test that the workflow behaves reliably, rather than assuming every task needs an agent.

How would you make an MCP-based tool integration low-latency and dependable?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Discuss tool-call boundaries, timeouts, error handling, and how you would measure latency. Explain the trade-off between responsiveness and the work needed to produce a useful result.

How would you integrate diverse data sources into a Python application?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Cover validation, inconsistent formats, and how you would trace data errors. Where relevant, explain when Pandas, NumPy, or Scikit-learn would help, without assuming the role requires a specific modeling task.

How would you troubleshoot and test an unreliable or slow Python application?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe how you would reproduce the issue, isolate its cause, measure performance, and verify a fix. Distinguish tests that catch regressions from measurements that show an optimization worked.

How would Docker and a cloud platform affect your production-service design?

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Discuss reproducible environments, configuration, deployment concerns, and operational visibility at a high level. The posting names Docker and AWS or Azure familiarity, but does not specify a deployment setup.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you led a technical design decision.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Give the situation, the options you considered, your actions in reaching a decision, and the result. Focus on how you handled trade-offs and input from others.

Tell me about a time you helped a junior developer improve their work.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe the situation, your mentoring or code-review actions, and the result. Explain how you gave actionable feedback while leaving room for the developer to reason through the solution.

Tell me about a time you aligned an engineering solution with a business need.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Set out the situation, how you clarified requirements with other teams, what you changed or proposed, and the result. Distinguish the requested feature from the underlying need you identified.

Tell me about a difficult reliability or performance problem you investigated.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe the symptoms, your diagnostic actions, and the result, including what evidence confirmed the cause. Explain how you communicated uncertainty while investigating.

Tell me about a documentation or process improvement you drove.

What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain the situation, the improvement you made, and its result for the people using or maintaining the service. Focus on a concrete change rather than a general preference for documentation.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Python OOP and system design

    Review how object boundaries and design patterns support scalable services. Exercise: sketch two designs for a Python service and explain their trade-offs. The posting explicitly calls for solid OOP, system architecture, and software design patterns.

  • Agentic workflows and multi-model RAG

    Trace a hypothetical request through an agent workflow and multi-model retrieval-augmented generation pipeline; identify where decisions, retrieval, and model calls occur. The role explicitly includes production-ready agentic workflows and multi-model RAG; LangGraph is given as an example.

  • MCP tool integration and latency

    Diagram a hypothetical MCP-based tool call and list where latency or failures could arise. This prepares for the posting’s explicit focus on low-latency MCP-based integrations.

  • API and data architecture

    Review RESTful API boundaries, SQL data modeling, and integration of diverse data sources. Exercise: outline an API request that reads and updates records, including its database interactions. The posting names RESTful APIs, PostgreSQL or MySQL, and data integration; NoSQL exposure is only a plus.

  • Reliability and technical leadership

    Review how design reviews, tests, debugging, and documentation support dependable services. Exercise: critique a sample design for failure handling and explain the changes in terms a cross-functional team could use. These activities match the role’s stated leadership and collaboration responsibilities.

Skills to revise

  • Build a Python REST service

    As practice, implement a small service with one of Django, Flask, or FastAPI, using clear OOP boundaries and documented endpoints. The posting explicitly asks for Python services, one of these frameworks, and RESTful APIs.

  • Prototype an agentic RAG flow

    As practice, implement a small workflow that retrieves sample material, selects between two model responses, and records its decision path; use LangGraph if available. This targets the stated agentic workflow and multi-model RAG work without assuming a specific production design.

  • Test an MCP-based tool call

    As practice, connect a sample workflow to a mock MCP tool, measure call latency, and handle a timeout or error. The posting explicitly mentions MCP-based, low-latency tool integrations.

  • Work across SQL and Python data libraries

    As practice, query a small PostgreSQL or MySQL dataset, clean the result with Pandas or NumPy, and explain where Scikit-learn would or would not help. This covers named database and library familiarity without implying a required modeling task.

  • Debug, test, and package a service

    As practice, reproduce a slow or failing API request, add a regression test, measure the change, and package the service with Docker. Review how it could run on AWS or Azure at a high level. The posting calls for troubleshooting, testing, optimization, Docker, and cloud familiarity.

  • Lead a design review

    As practice, write a brief design proposal, give actionable review comments on a sample change, and explain trade-offs to a non-engineering stakeholder. The role explicitly includes technical design, code reviews, mentoring, documentation, and alignment with business needs.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Prepare a Python service walkthrough

    The role calls for scalable Python services, OOP, and REST APIs. Prepare a concise walkthrough of a relevant project, or a proposed design if no past example fits, covering framework choice, architecture, design patterns, and trade-offs.

  • Sketch an agentic AI and RAG workflow

    The posting specifies production-ready agentic workflows, multi-model RAG, LangGraph, and MCP-based low-latency tool integrations. Draw a proposed workflow and explain retrieval, model and tool selection, failure handling, and latency trade-offs.

  • Map the data and deployment design

    Prepare a diagram showing how a Python API could integrate diverse data sources, use PostgreSQL or MySQL, and run with Docker on AWS or Azure. Be ready to distinguish hands-on experience from familiarity; the posting treats NoSQL as a plus.

  • Bring reliability and debugging evidence

    Select a concrete example of a performance or reliability issue, if available. Summarize how it was diagnosed, tested, improved, and documented, with measured results where known rather than estimated claims.

  • Prepare a technical leadership example

    The position includes design leadership, code reviews, mentoring, and cross-functional collaboration. Outline one relevant decision or review: the requirements, alternatives considered, feedback given, and outcome.

  • Review relevant Python data tooling

    The posting names Pandas, NumPy, and Scikit-learn. Prepare brief, accurate examples of where you have used them, or identify what you would need to validate before using them in this role.

  • Draft questions about the team's priorities

    Ask which digital-employee workflows are the immediate focus, how the team evaluates RAG quality and tool latency, and how engineering and business teams define requirements. These are questions to resolve, not assumptions about Mvue's processes.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 4 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…