Technical practice
How would you architect an enterprise application using Claude APIs?
What to coverThe role calls for enterprise AI architecture powered by Claude. Suggested answer: describe service boundaries, request orchestration, scaling and failure handling, and explain the trade-offs behind those choices.
How would you design and evaluate a RAG workflow?
What to coverThe posting explicitly calls for RAG platforms and semantic retrieval. Suggested answer: explain ingestion, retrieval, grounding and answer generation, then discuss how you would test retrieval relevance and whether answers are supported by retrieved content.
How would you choose a vector search strategy?
What to coverThe role includes vector search, embeddings and vector databases. Suggested answer: compare retrieval quality, filtering needs, latency, scale and operational complexity rather than assuming one listed database fits every use case.
When would you use a multi-agent workflow rather than a simpler LLM workflow?
What to coverThe posting names multi-agent workflows, LangChain and LangGraph. Suggested answer: identify when distinct responsibilities justify orchestration, and address coordination, state, failure recovery and added complexity.
How would you improve prompts and context for a Claude application?
What to coverLeading prompt engineering, context engineering and Claude model optimization is a stated duty. Suggested answer: discuss how to select relevant context, manage its size and measure output quality against latency and cost.
How would you expose AI orchestration through scalable Python services?
What to coverThe role calls for Python microservices and REST APIs, with FastAPI listed as a required technology. Suggested answer: cover API boundaries, validation, timeouts, concurrency and how clients receive useful errors when an upstream AI call fails.
How would you build security and Responsible AI into the architecture?
What to coverThe posting explicitly requires AI governance, security and Responsible AI practices. Suggested answer: discuss access control, sensitive-data handling, safeguards around model outputs and how governance decisions would be documented.
What would you observe in a production LLM or RAG system?
What to coverObservability and production-ready architecture are stated priorities. Suggested answer: distinguish service health from AI quality, and explain how traces, latency, errors and quality signals could help diagnose degraded results.
How would you deploy and update these services reliably?
What to coverThe listed stack includes Azure, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes, Git and CI/CD. Suggested answer: explain deployment and rollback choices, configuration management and tests for application changes without assuming the company uses a particular cloud or pipeline.
Behavioural practice
Tell me about an architecture decision you led under competing constraints.
What to coverThe role requires enterprise architecture and technical leadership. Suggested answer: give the situation, the options and trade-offs you evaluated, the action you took and the resulting outcome.
Describe a time you mentored engineers on a complex technical design.
What to coverMentoring engineering teams is an explicit responsibility. Suggested answer: explain the situation, how you adapted your guidance, what the team did differently and the observable result.
Tell me about a difficult architecture review.
What to coverThe posting calls for driving architecture reviews. Suggested answer: describe the situation, a substantive concern or disagreement, how you resolved it and what changed as a result.
Describe how you handled a production reliability or quality problem.
What to coverThe role emphasizes observability and production-ready AI platforms. Suggested answer: use a real situation to explain how you identified the issue, acted on the evidence and measured the result.
Tell me about balancing delivery with governance or security concerns.
What to coverGovernance, security and Responsible AI are stated responsibilities. Suggested answer: describe the situation, how you worked through the competing concerns, the decision you made and its outcome.