New opportunity

Lead AI Engineer (S04)

Systango Technologies Limited · Indore, India

About this role

Systango Technologies Limited seeks a Lead AI Engineer in Indore to lead the architecture and development of scalable, production-grade AI products. The role works with Product, Engineering and Data teams to deliver enterprise-ready solutions.

Responsibilities

  • Design, build and deploy applications using commercial and open-source large language models. Develop retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines using enterprise data and vector databases, and build AI agents and multi-agent workflows for automation and decision-making.
  • Integrate AI capabilities with backend services, APIs, databases and enterprise applications; build scalable Python services and APIs for AI workloads.
  • Evaluate and improve application quality, latency, reliability and cost. Deploy, monitor and continually improve production systems, mentor engineers, and help define AI architecture and engineering standards.

Required qualifications

  • 8–10 years of overall software development experience, including a strong grounding in software architecture, distributed systems, API design and engineering best practices. The role calls for a software engineering background using Python, Java or Node.js and experience building production services with FastAPI or a similar framework.
  • 3–4 years building production GenAI or LLM-based applications; experience with commercial or open-source models such as OpenAI, Claude, Gemini, Llama or Mistral. Hands-on RAG and vector database experience, with examples including Pinecone, Weaviate, pgvector, Chroma and FAISS.
  • Experience designing agentic systems, including orchestrator agents, multi-agent architectures and agent-to-agent collaboration, using frameworks or protocols such as LangGraph, OpenAI Agents SDK, Gemini ADK, Pydantic AI and A2A Protocols. Understanding of prompt engineering, structured outputs, tool/function calling and AI workflows.
  • Experience with AWS, Azure or GCP; Docker, Kubernetes and CI/CD; production AI deployment and operations; and databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB or DynamoDB.

Preferred qualifications

Fine-tuning open-source LLMs with LoRA, QLoRA, PEFT or Hugging Face; managing enterprise-scale agents; experience with Amazon Bedrock, Google Vertex AI/Gemini Enterprise or Azure AI Foundry; AI evaluation and observability tools such as RAGAS, DeepEval, TruLens or LangSmith; familiarity with PyTorch, TensorFlow or custom model development; and AI solutions for enterprise or regulated industries. This is a full-time position.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

PythonJavaNode.jsSoftware architectureDistributed systemsAPI designFastAPIGenerative AILarge language modelsOpenAIClaudeGeminiLlamaMistralRetrieval-Augmented GenerationPineconeWeaviatepgvectorChromaFAISSAI agentsMulti-agent systemsLangGraphOpenAI Agents SDKGemini ADKPydantic AIA2A ProtocolsPrompt engineeringStructured outputsTool calling AWS

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Lead production AI architecture

    The role leads architecture and development of scalable, enterprise-ready AI products using commercial and open-source LLMs. It also calls for sound distributed-systems and API design. Prepare to explain an end-to-end architecture and the decisions behind it.

  • Build enterprise RAG and agent workflows

    The posting specifically calls for RAG pipelines over enterprise data and vector databases, plus orchestrator agents and multi-agent workflows. Prepare to describe how retrieval, tool calling, structured outputs and agent collaboration fit into an application.

  • Integrate and operate AI services

    Responsibilities include connecting AI to backend services, APIs, databases and enterprise applications; building scalable Python services; and deploying, monitoring and improving them in production. Prepare a concrete deployment and operations example.

  • Set quality standards and guide delivery

    The lead must evaluate quality, latency, reliability and cost, mentor engineers, and contribute to architecture and engineering standards while working with Product, Engineering and Data teams. Prepare to explain how technical decisions were measured and communicated.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing answer quality against speed and cost

    Likely preparation challenge, not a stated employer problem: model and retrieval choices may improve output quality while increasing latency or spend. Prepare an example of evaluation criteria, measurements and a decision made across those trade-offs.

  • Keeping agent workflows dependable

    Likely preparation challenge: tool calls and agent-to-agent handoffs can make failures harder to locate than in a single service. Prepare to discuss workflow boundaries, failure handling and observability without assuming a particular company implementation.

  • Moving from a working prototype to an operable product

    Likely preparation challenge: integrating enterprise data and APIs while maintaining reliable production behavior requires more than a successful demo. Prepare to walk through service design, deployment, monitoring and iterative improvement, including what you would validate before release.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you architect an end-to-end, production-grade AI application for enterprise use?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Describe the components from data and model access through backend APIs to deployment and monitoring. Explain how distributed-system boundaries and failure handling support scalability and reliability.

How would you choose between commercial and open-source LLMs for an application?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Compare output quality, latency, operating cost and deployment constraints against the application's needs. Explain how you would validate the choice rather than assume one model is best.

How would you build a RAG pipeline over enterprise data sources?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Walk through ingestion, indexing, retrieval and generation, including how a vector database fits into the design. Explain how you would check whether retrieved material supports the final answer.

How would you diagnose poor retrieval results in a RAG application?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Separate problems in source data, indexing and retrieval from problems in generation. Describe targeted tests and the trade-off between retrieval quality, latency and cost.

How would you design an orchestrator agent and multi-agent workflow for business automation?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Define each agent's responsibility, how work is handed off and when the workflow should stop or request intervention. Discuss the reliability and complexity trade-offs against a simpler workflow.

How would you make tool calling and structured LLM outputs dependable?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Discuss prompts, output schemas, validation and handling failed tool calls. Explain how you would test an AI workflow when model responses vary.

How would you expose AI workloads through scalable Python APIs and integrate enterprise services?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Describe API boundaries, database and backend integration, and how requests move through the service. Address concurrency, timeouts and failure behavior as suggested design considerations for production workloads.

How would you evaluate an AI application's quality, latency, reliability and cost?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Define separate measures for each dimension and describe how representative test cases would reveal trade-offs. If discussing tools such as RAGAS or LangSmith, distinguish their use from the decision criteria; these tools are listed as preferred, not required.

How would you deploy and operate an AI service using cloud infrastructure, containers and CI/CD?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Explain how you would release a containerized service, monitor production behavior and respond to regressions. Connect deployment decisions to the posting's emphasis on continuous improvement and reliable operation.

When would you consider fine-tuning an open-source LLM rather than changing prompts or retrieval?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Treat fine-tuning as an optional topic because it is listed as preferred. Compare the expected quality gain with data, evaluation and operational costs, and explain what evidence would justify the choice.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you aligned Product, Engineering and Data teams on an AI product decision.

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Use a real situation to explain differing priorities, the action you took to reach a decision and the result. Make your own contribution and the resulting product or engineering trade-off clear.

Describe a time you mentored engineers on an architecture or engineering practice.

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Give the situation and the specific guidance or feedback you provided. Explain the observable result without claiming an impact you cannot substantiate.

Tell me about a production issue you helped resolve and prevent from recurring.

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Set out the situation, your diagnostic and recovery actions, and the result. Relate any follow-up monitoring or engineering change to the role's production-operations responsibilities.

Describe a time you made a difficult trade-off between quality, latency, reliability and cost.

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Explain the constraints, the evidence behind your action and the outcome. Be specific about what you measured and what you chose not to optimize.

Tell me about a time you established or changed a technical standard across a team.

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Describe the situation, how you gained input and put the standard into practice, and the result. Focus on your leadership actions rather than presenting the standard as universally applicable.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Production AI architecture

    For revision, diagram an AI service and explain its API boundaries, database integration, scaling and failure handling. The posting requires software architecture, distributed systems and API design, and expects the lead to define engineering standards.

  • RAG design trade-offs

    For revision, explain how enterprise data becomes retrievable context, then compare two retrieval approaches and their effects on answer quality and latency. The role explicitly calls for scalable RAG pipelines and vector databases.

  • Agent orchestration

    For revision, sketch an orchestrator and two collaborating agents, showing tool calls, handoffs and failure paths. The posting calls for agentic systems, multi-agent workflows and agent-to-agent collaboration.

  • LLM application contracts

    For revision, compare commercial and open-source model choices for one application, then explain how prompts, structured outputs and tool/function calling constrain its behavior. All are named in the required skills.

  • Production evaluation and operations

    For revision, outline how to assess quality, latency, reliability and cost after deployment, including what a monitoring signal would prompt you to investigate. Evaluating, deploying, monitoring and improving production AI applications are stated responsibilities.

Skills to revise

  • Build a small RAG pipeline

    As a practice exercise, ingest a sample document set into one listed vector database, retrieve passages and use them to answer a question with an LLM. This rehearses the required hands-on RAG and vector database work; the exercise is a preparation suggestion, not a specified project.

  • Implement an agent workflow

    As a practice exercise, create an orchestrator with a tool-calling step and a second agent, then test a failed handoff. Use one of the listed frameworks or protocols if available. This maps to the posting’s agent and multi-agent implementation requirements.

  • Serve an AI workload through an API

    As a practice exercise, build a Python endpoint with FastAPI or a similar framework that calls an AI workflow, validates a structured response and records an error. The role calls for scalable Python services, production APIs and backend integration.

  • Deploy and operate a service

    As a practice exercise, containerize the API with Docker, outline its Kubernetes deployment and CI/CD checks, and specify a monitoring response to a failed request. Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD and production operation are listed requirements; no particular cloud provider is mandated beyond AWS, Azure or GCP experience.

  • Run a comparative evaluation

    As a practice exercise, test a small set of representative requests, record answer quality, latency and cost, then explain one improvement and its trade-off. This directly rehearses the role’s responsibility to evaluate and optimize AI applications.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map experience to the stated requirements

    Prepare a brief evidence sheet with dates, responsibilities and concrete examples relevant to 8–10 years in software development and 3–4 years building production GenAI or LLM applications. Mark preferred skills separately and include only work actually done.

  • Build an end-to-end project walkthrough

    Select one relevant AI application, if available, and prepare a diagram and five-minute explanation of its architecture, model choice, integrations, deployment, your decisions and observed results.

  • Explain a RAG pipeline in detail

    Prepare an example covering enterprise data ingestion, retrieval, vector database choice, answer generation and how you evaluated retrieval and response quality. Use a hypothetical design if you cannot share project details.

  • Sketch an agent workflow

    As interview practice, diagram an orchestrator or multi-agent workflow for a business task. Explain tool calling, structured outputs, agent handoffs and how you would handle failures or unsafe actions.

  • Practice a production architecture design

    Sketch a scalable Python API serving an AI workload, with backend and database integrations. Be ready to justify API boundaries, distributed-system trade-offs and how Docker, Kubernetes and CI/CD would fit.

  • Prepare an operations and evaluation example

    Show how you measured or would measure quality, latency, reliability and cost, then explain monitoring and an improvement decision. Distinguish measured results from proposed metrics.

  • Prepare leadership evidence and employer questions

    Identify a specific example of mentoring or setting engineering standards, if available. Ask how Product, Engineering and Data collaborate, how AI quality is evaluated, and which production challenges this lead role would address first.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 4 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…