New opportunity

Generative AI Engineer Jobs in Hyderabad – LLM, NLP, RAG, Python

DigitalXNode · Hyderabad, India

About this role

DigitalXNode is seeking AI engineers in Hyderabad to build and deploy LLM-based and generative AI applications. The role focuses on real-world NLP solutions, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines and intelligent workflows. It is a full-time, hybrid position with an India work shift.

Responsibilities

  • Design and deploy generative AI applications; build scalable RAG pipelines, AI agents and agentic workflows using LangGraph.
  • Implement NLP solutions and work with knowledge graphs and semantic layers.
  • Develop APIs with Python and FastAPI, optimize SQL and NoSQL database performance, and contribute to system architecture, microservices and scalable systems.
  • Follow CI/CD, Git and code review practices.

Requirements

  • 3–10 years of experience, with flexibility for exceptional candidates up to 12 years. Strong experience in AI, machine learning and generative AI; hands-on experience with LLMs, RAG, NLP and LangGraph or AI workflow orchestration.
  • Proficiency in Python, FastAPI and API development; strong SQL and NoSQL knowledge; experience with system design and scalable architecture.
  • A bachelor’s degree in computer science, engineering or a related field. Graduates in other fields with relevant experience are also welcome.

Preferred

  • Experience with vector databases such as Pinecone, FAISS or Weaviate; knowledge of AWS, Azure or GCP; and exposure to MLOps and AI deployment pipelines.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Generative AIMachine LearningLarge Language ModelsRetrieval-Augmented GenerationNatural Language ProcessingAI agentsLangGraphKnowledge graphsSemantic layersPythonFastAPIAPI developmentSQLNoSQLSystem designMicroservicesCI/CDGitCode reviewVector databasesPineconeFAISSWeaviateAWSAzureGCPMLOps

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Deploy LLM applications and scalable RAG

    The role explicitly calls for designing and deploying generative AI applications and building scalable RAG pipelines. Prepare to explain end-to-end design decisions, from retrieval through generation and deployment.

  • Build agentic workflows with LangGraph

    Developing AI agents and LangGraph workflows is a stated responsibility. Prepare a concrete account of how you would structure workflow steps, state and failure handling.

  • Connect NLP with structured knowledge

    The posting calls for NLP solutions and work with knowledge graphs and semantic layers. Prepare to explain when structured relationships could help an NLP application, while treating the specific use cases as unspecified.

  • Engineer scalable APIs and data access

    Python and FastAPI APIs, SQL/NoSQL performance, microservices and system architecture are all stated duties. Prepare to discuss the boundaries between an AI workflow, its API and its data stores.

  • Maintain deployable code

    The role includes CI/CD, Git workflows and code review. Prepare to describe how changes to an AI application can be tested, reviewed and released; the posting does not specify a particular toolchain.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Retrieval quality versus scale

    A likely challenge in the advertised scalable RAG work is improving the relevance of retrieved context without making responses too slow or costly. Prepare to compare retrieval approaches using quality and performance measures; no employer-specific targets are stated.

  • Agent flexibility versus predictable behavior

    LangGraph-based agents may need to handle varied tasks while keeping workflow behavior understandable and recoverable. Prepare to describe where you would constrain transitions, handle errors and inspect outcomes; this is a preparation hypothesis, not a reported problem.

  • AI features versus service performance

    Combining LLM workflows with FastAPI, SQL/NoSQL and microservices may create trade-offs between feature complexity and API or database performance. Prepare to reason through bottlenecks and architecture choices rather than assume a particular production environment.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you design and evaluate an LLM-based application before deployment?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Describe how you would define the task, choose an LLM-based approach and test output quality against representative examples. Discuss trade-offs such as response quality, latency and cost without assuming a particular model or deployment platform.

How would you build a scalable retrieval-augmented generation pipeline?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Walk through document preparation, indexing, retrieval, context assembly and generation. Explain how you would measure answer quality and diagnose whether a poor answer came from retrieval or generation.

How would you choose and tune a vector-search component for RAG?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Compare retrieval quality, update needs, latency and operational complexity, then explain how you would test changes. Vector databases, including Pinecone, FAISS and Weaviate, are listed as good-to-have experience rather than required choices.

How would you structure an agentic workflow using LangGraph?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Explain states, transitions and when an agent should stop or hand off work. Discuss how you would make failures observable and decide whether an agentic workflow is preferable to a simpler fixed sequence.

How would you develop and assess an NLP solution for a real-world task?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Describe how you would establish a baseline, select evaluation examples and inspect error patterns. Distinguish what conventional NLP methods and LLM-based methods might offer for the chosen task.

Where could knowledge graphs and semantic layers fit in an AI application?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Explain how structured relationships and consistent meanings could support retrieval or downstream answers. Compare their potential value and maintenance cost with using unstructured text alone.

How would you expose an AI workflow through a Python and FastAPI API?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Describe request validation, response design, error handling and how to keep slow AI work from degrading the API. Explain how you would test the boundary between the endpoint and the underlying workflow.

How would you investigate poor SQL or NoSQL database performance?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Start with the access pattern and measurements, then discuss indexing, query design and data-model trade-offs. Explain how you would verify that an optimization helps without compromising correctness.

How would you design a scalable system around RAG services, agents and APIs?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Describe service boundaries, data flow and likely scaling bottlenecks in an architecture using the components named in the posting. Discuss when separating microservices helps and when it adds unnecessary complexity.

How would you make changes to an AI application safe to release?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Cover Git-based review, automated checks and CI/CD for code and AI-workflow changes. As a suggested extension, discuss deployment monitoring and rollback; MLOps and cloud-platform knowledge are listed as good to have.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time code review improved an AI or API change.

What to coverSuggested practice: Use a real situation, your actions in giving or receiving feedback, and the result. Focus on a specific technical concern and how the review affected the implementation.

Tell me about a time you diagnosed a poor result from an NLP or retrieval system.

What to coverSuggested practice: Set out the symptom and context, how you isolated the cause, and the result of your changes. If your example was not a RAG system, explain the transferable troubleshooting approach rather than presenting it as RAG experience.

Tell me about a time you weighed competing system-design options.

What to coverSuggested practice: Describe the situation, the options and trade-offs you evaluated, the action you took, and the observed result. An example involving scalability, databases or service boundaries would connect to the stated responsibilities.

Tell me about a time you improved a delivery or deployment practice.

What to coverSuggested practice: Give the starting situation, your contribution to a Git, CI/CD or release workflow, and the result. Be precise about what you personally changed and how you assessed its effect.

Tell me about a time you coordinated an API change with another system component.

What to coverSuggested practice: Use a real situation to explain the interface or integration issue, how you worked with others to resolve it, and the result. This is a suggested way to prepare for the posting's API and microservices work, not a stated interview topic.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • LLM and generative AI design

    Revision exercise (suggestion): explain how you would choose and assess an LLM-based approach to a text task, including likely failure modes. Relevance: the role requires strong AI, ML and GenAI experience and involves designing LLM-based applications.

  • RAG pipeline concepts

    Revision exercise (suggestion): sketch the path from source content through retrieval to a generated answer, then explain how you would check retrieval quality and answer grounding. Relevance: hands-on RAG experience and scalable RAG pipelines are explicit requirements.

  • Agent and workflow orchestration

    Revision exercise (suggestion): diagram a LangGraph workflow with state, decision points and a stopping condition; explain when a workflow is preferable to a single LLM call. Relevance: the posting calls for AI agents and agentic workflows using LangGraph.

  • NLP, knowledge graphs and semantic layers

    Revision exercise (suggestion): describe how an NLP task could use entities and relationships represented in a knowledge graph, and clarify the semantic layer’s role. Relevance: implementing NLP solutions and working with knowledge graphs and semantic layers are listed responsibilities.

  • Scalable architecture and data trade-offs

    Revision exercise (suggestion): draw a microservice-based AI application and explain API boundaries, scaling bottlenecks, and SQL versus NoSQL data choices. Relevance: the role requires system design and scalable architecture and includes database performance work.

Skills to revise

  • Build a Python and FastAPI endpoint

    Revision exercise (suggestion): implement a small API endpoint that accepts a request, validates it, calls a stubbed AI workflow and returns a structured response. Relevance: Python, FastAPI and API development are required.

  • Implement a RAG flow

    Revision exercise (suggestion): build a small retrieval-to-answer pipeline and inspect examples where retrieved content is irrelevant or insufficient. Relevance: building scalable RAG pipelines is a core responsibility. Pinecone, FAISS and Weaviate are listed only as good-to-have vector database experience.

  • Implement a LangGraph workflow

    Revision exercise (suggestion): create a short stateful agent workflow with a conditional branch and a clear completion path, then trace its behavior on two inputs. Relevance: LangGraph or AI workflow orchestration is explicitly required.

  • Implement an NLP-to-graph example

    Revision exercise (suggestion): extract entities and relationships from a few sample texts and represent how they would connect in a knowledge graph. Relevance: the responsibilities include NLP solutions, knowledge graphs and semantic layers; this example is a preparation suggestion, not a specified project.

  • Investigate SQL and NoSQL performance

    Revision exercise (suggestion): take one query or access pattern for each database type, identify a likely bottleneck and explain how you would measure an improvement. Relevance: strong SQL and NoSQL knowledge and performance optimization are stated.

  • Practice delivery and code review

    Revision exercise (suggestion): make a small Git change, review it for correctness and maintainability, and outline how a CI/CD check would guard its release. Relevance: the responsibilities explicitly include Git workflows, code review and CI/CD.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Prepare an LLM project walkthrough

    The role calls for designing and deploying generative AI applications. Choose a real project you can discuss, if available, and outline the problem, your decisions, deployment approach and results. If you lack a matching project, prepare a clearly labeled design example instead.

  • Map out a scalable RAG pipeline

    The posting emphasizes hands-on RAG and NLP. Draw the ingestion, retrieval and generation flow, then prepare to explain how you would test retrieval quality and handle poor or missing results. These testing choices are preparation suggestions, not stated requirements.

  • Sketch a LangGraph workflow

    Prepare a small agentic-workflow diagram showing its states, transitions and tool use. Be ready to explain why orchestration helps the example and where a simpler flow would suffice; the role specifically names LangGraph or AI workflow orchestration.

  • Practice an API and architecture design

    Outline a Python/FastAPI service for an LLM application, including its endpoints, service boundaries and scaling choices. Add a SQL and NoSQL performance issue you could diagnose, since APIs, databases and scalable architecture are listed responsibilities.

  • Gather engineering-practice evidence

    Identify concrete examples, where available, of Git workflows, code reviews and CI/CD work. Prepare brief explanations of your contribution and the outcome rather than treating these listed practices as a separate certification requirement.

  • Distinguish preferred-tool experience

    If relevant, prepare examples involving a vector database, cloud platform or MLOps deployment pipeline. The posting labels these good to have; state plainly where your experience ends rather than implying they are required.

  • Write questions about the work

    Bring questions about the team’s current RAG and NLP use cases, how knowledge graphs or semantic layers fit the architecture, and what deployment responsibilities the engineer would own. These are questions to clarify, not claims about DigitalXNode’s existing systems.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 29, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 5 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…