Technical practice
How would you choose and evaluate a machine-learning approach for a production application?
What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would define the task, establish a baseline, select metrics and test on representative data. Discuss trade-offs between model quality, performance and operational complexity.
How would you preprocess a large dataset for model development?
What to coverSuggested preparation: Cover data-quality checks, missing or inconsistent values, and a reproducible preprocessing workflow. Explain how you would prevent leakage between training and evaluation data.
What would make an AI application pipeline production-ready?
What to coverSuggested preparation: Walk through development, deployment and validation in a cloud or on-premises setting. Explain how you would make failures visible and maintain the application’s quality after release.
When would you use a cloud AI service rather than an on-premises approach?
What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare integration effort, control, scalability and operational constraints in the context of the application. The posting mentions both cloud AI services and cloud or on-premises pipelines, but does not prescribe a platform.
How would you decide whether a generative AI model belongs in a proposed solution?
What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the use case it would address and how you would compare it with a simpler approach. Cover ways to evaluate output quality and handle unreliable responses before production use.
How would you develop and evaluate a deep-learning model using TensorFlow or PyTorch?
What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss the model choice, training workflow and evidence you would use to detect overfitting or weak generalization. Explain what would drive a change to the architecture or training approach.
How would you develop and deploy a chatbot or conversational agent?
What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe how you would define supported interactions, integrate the agent with an application and evaluate whether responses meet the intended need. Include how you would handle requests the agent cannot resolve reliably.
How would you approach an image-processing problem?
What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would assess image quality, choose suitable processing techniques and evaluate the resulting output. Discuss how variation in input images could affect performance.
How would you integrate an AI solution into an existing workflow?
What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would identify integration points and agree on inputs, outputs and quality expectations with other teams. Describe how you would validate the end-to-end workflow, not just the model in isolation.
How would you investigate a decline in an existing AI system’s performance?
What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe how you would determine whether the issue comes from data, the model or the surrounding application. Explain how you would evaluate a proposed fix and check that it improves the system without creating new problems.
Behavioural practice
Tell me about a consequential technical decision you made for a team.
What to coverSuggested preparation: Use a real situation, your decision-making actions and the result. Explain the trade-offs you considered and how you involved the people responsible for delivery.
Describe a time you worked with other teams to integrate a technical solution.
What to coverSuggested preparation: Set out the shared goal, your actions to resolve differing requirements and the outcome. Be specific about your contribution to the integration.
Tell me about a problem you helped solve beyond your immediate team.
What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the situation, how you diagnosed it and what you did with the teams involved. State the result and what evidence showed the solution worked.
Give an example of mentoring a junior colleague on technical work.
What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain the colleague’s learning need, the support you provided and the result. Focus on observable changes rather than a general claim that the mentoring helped.