New opportunity

AI Engineer

Willsfly Technologies Inc · Hyderabad, India

About this role

The AI Engineer supports enterprise software and intelligent product systems by defining AI architecture and helping align technical direction with delivery, operational quality, and long-term product needs. This is a hybrid, full-time direct-hire role in Hyderabad, India, within the AI & Intelligent Systems department.

Responsibilities

  • Define enterprise AI architecture patterns that address scalability, trust, and business relevance.
  • Guide cloud-native AI platform design across integration, orchestration, and observability layers.
  • Support governance decisions that improve AI safety, execution maturity, and measurable return on investment.
  • Work with engineering, product, and leadership teams to align architecture decisions with delivery realities.
  • Shape long-term AI operating models for enterprise products and intelligent systems.

Required qualifications

  • The posting lists 9–12 years of experience and specifies a minimum of 9+ years in enterprise architecture, AI systems, cloud strategy, or platform engineering.
  • Strong architecture design capability across distributed services, enterprise APIs, and intelligent systems; ability to translate business direction into practical technical decisions and lead cross-functional technical alignment.
  • Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in Computer Science, Engineering, AI, Enterprise Architecture, or a related discipline.

Preferred qualifications

Experience with enterprise AI modernization; exposure to governance, trust, explainability, and model lifecycle controls; or a background in cloud architecture consulting or product-platform transformation. AWS or Azure Architect and Enterprise Architecture certifications are preferred; AI governance or cloud strategy certification is a plus.

The listed salary range is ?28L – ?40L LPA plus a performance bonus. Benefits include medical coverage, leadership development support, and strategic certification reimbursement. The stated notice period is 30–60 days. Applicants are asked to provide a resume, professional summary, work authorization details, current location, and availability.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Enterprise AI architectureCloud-native architectureCloud strategyDistributed servicesEnterprise APIsAI governanceAI safetyLLM systemsPlatform engineeringSystems integrationOrchestrationObservabilityArchitecture consultingExplainabilityModel lifecycle controlsCross-functional collaborationAWSAzure

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Enterprise AI architecture

    The role defines architecture patterns for intelligent systems that balance scalability, trust, and business relevance. The posting also calls for design capability across distributed services and enterprise APIs.

  • Cloud-native platform design

    Guide AI platform structure across integration, orchestration, and observability layers, with attention to how those layers support enterprise software and product systems.

  • AI governance and measurable value

    Support decisions that improve AI safety and execution maturity while connecting architecture choices to measurable return on investment.

  • Cross-functional architecture alignment

    Translate business direction into practical technical decisions and align engineering, product, and leadership teams with delivery realities.

  • Long-term operating models

    Shape AI operating models for enterprise products and intelligent systems, reflecting the posting’s emphasis on product maturity and long-horizon software continuity.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing scale, trust, and relevance

    Preparation hypothesis: An architecture that scales may add complexity or cost, while trust controls may constrain what can be delivered. Prepare an example of how you evaluated these competing goals against a business need and explained the resulting design choice.

  • Making platform layers workable together

    Preparation hypothesis: Integration, orchestration, and observability can pull a cloud-native design in different directions, especially under delivery constraints. Prepare to explain the boundaries between these layers and the trade-offs behind a practical design.

  • Reconciling near-term delivery with long-term control

    Preparation hypothesis: Safety and model lifecycle controls may require investment before their value is easy to measure. Prepare an example of how you would present options to product, engineering, and leadership, including delivery impact, risks, and measures of value.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you design an enterprise AI architecture that balances scalability, trust, and business relevance?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would turn a business objective into architecture decisions and make trade-offs explicit. Address how you would evaluate scalability and trust rather than treating them as design labels.

How would you define service boundaries and enterprise APIs for an intelligent system?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss how distributed services and APIs affect integration, ownership, and change over time. Explain what would lead you to simplify or separate a service boundary.

How would you structure integration and orchestration in a cloud-native AI platform?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe how components would exchange data and coordinate work across the platform. Compare approaches in terms of coupling, reliability, and operational complexity.

What would you observe to assess the operational quality of an AI platform?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Identify signals across service health, AI behavior, and end-to-end workflows. Explain how those signals would help teams diagnose failures and decide what to improve.

How would you evaluate whether an LLM system is suitable for an enterprise product use case?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Start with the product need, then discuss evaluation of output quality, trust, and operational fit. Explain how the findings would influence the architecture decision.

How would governance decisions address AI safety, trust, and explainability?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe how you would identify risks and choose controls appropriate to the use case. Discuss the trade-off between stronger controls and practical delivery.

How would you design model lifecycle controls for a long-running intelligent product?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Cover how changes could be evaluated, introduced, monitored, and reconsidered over time. Explain how those controls support product continuity without assuming a particular toolchain.

How would you assess the return on investment of an AI platform architecture?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Connect the proposed architecture to measurable business and delivery outcomes. Explain how you would weigh expected value against implementation and ongoing operating costs.

How would you approach enterprise AI modernization without disrupting existing product systems?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss how you would assess existing services and choose an incremental path. Compare near-term delivery needs with the longer-term architecture direction.

What should a long-horizon AI operating model define for an enterprise product?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Consider decision ownership, governance, operational feedback, and how architecture changes are managed. Explain how the model would remain workable as the product evolves.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you aligned engineering, product, and leadership on an architecture decision.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use a real situation, the actions you took to surface priorities and trade-offs, and the result. Be clear about your own contribution to the alignment.

Describe a time delivery realities required you to revise an architecture direction.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain the situation, what constraint emerged, and how you adapted the decision. Include the result and what you learned about balancing direction with execution.

Give an example of raising a safety or trust concern during an AI or platform decision.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the situation, the evidence you used, and the action you took with stakeholders. State the result without overstating your authority or the impact.

Tell me about a time you guided modernization or a product-platform change.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Set out the starting point, the actions you took to manage change, and the result. Focus on how you handled trade-offs between immediate delivery and long-term continuity.

Describe a time operational feedback changed your technical priorities.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Identify the situation and the signal that showed a problem, then explain your actions. Give the result, including how you assessed whether the change improved quality.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Enterprise AI architecture trade-offs

    The role calls for architecture patterns that balance scalability, trust, and business relevance. As preparation, compare two possible architectures for an enterprise intelligent system and explain the trade-offs and business assumptions behind each.

  • Distributed services and enterprise APIs

    Strong architecture design across distributed services, enterprise APIs, and intelligent systems is a minimum qualification. Revise service boundaries, API contracts, and failure handling; sketch how an intelligent system would integrate with existing enterprise services.

  • Cloud-native platform layers

    The responsibilities name integration, orchestration, and observability. Revise what each layer must accomplish, then draw a platform-level design showing their interactions and where operational issues would become visible.

  • AI governance and measurable value

    The role supports decisions on AI safety, execution maturity, and measurable ROI. Rehearse how you would weigh a safety control against delivery cost and define a measure of business value; treat the example as interview preparation, not a stated company process.

  • Long-horizon operating models

    The posting calls for AI operating models that support enterprise products over time; explainability and model lifecycle controls appear in the preferred profile. As preparation, outline decision ownership and review points for a system after launch, noting which controls are preferred exposure rather than minimum requirements.

Skills to revise

  • Draft an architecture decision

    Write a one-page decision for a hypothetical enterprise AI capability: business objective, proposed distributed-service and API design, alternatives, scalability and trust trade-offs. This practices the required translation of business direction into technical architecture decisions.

  • Map platform integration

    Draw an integration flow from an enterprise API through an intelligent-system component, including orchestration and observability points. This rehearses the cloud-native platform design responsibilities without assuming a particular vendor or tool.

  • Lead a cross-functional review

    Practice a short architecture review in which engineering, product, and leadership raise conflicting delivery concerns; state a decision, its rationale, and unresolved questions. The posting explicitly requires cross-functional technical alignment.

  • Define a governance decision record

    For a hypothetical AI feature, draft the safety concern, proposed control, delivery impact, and measure of value. This is a suggested way to practice the role’s governance and ROI responsibilities, not a required Willsfly artifact.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map the hiring baseline to evidence

    Prepare a one-page evidence map for the stated 9+ years in enterprise architecture, AI systems, cloud strategy, or platform engineering; architecture work across distributed services and enterprise APIs; and the listed degree. Note preferred certifications separately, if applicable.

  • Build an enterprise AI architecture walkthrough

    Choose a relevant project and prepare a diagram, your decisions, trade-offs, and outcomes. Show how the architecture addressed scalability, trust, business relevance, and practical delivery constraints—areas named in the role.

  • Practice a cloud-native platform design exercise

    As interview preparation, sketch a hypothetical enterprise AI platform with integration, orchestration, and observability layers. Be ready to explain service and API boundaries, operational signals, and trade-offs; this is a practice exercise, not a stated hiring task.

  • Prepare a governance decision example

    Outline a decision involving AI safety or trust, its controls, and how you would evaluate results and ROI. If your experience includes explainability or model lifecycle controls, identify where they fit; the posting lists these as preferred exposure.

  • Show how you align technical direction with delivery

    Prepare an example of translating business direction into architecture decisions with engineering, product, and leadership stakeholders. Identify disagreements, the decision reached, and how it accounted for delivery realities.

  • Draft questions about long-term ownership

    Ask how the team measures platform ROI and operational quality, makes AI governance decisions, and assigns responsibility for long-horizon AI operating models across its U.S. and India product engineering structure.

  • Assemble the requested application materials

    Have an updated resume and relevant professional summary ready, along with clear work authorization, current location, and availability details, as requested in the posting.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 5 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…