New opportunity

Software Engineer - AI integratiion

Saarthee · Gurugram, India

About this role

Saarthee seeks a Software Engineer for AI integration in Gurugram. This hybrid, full-time role focuses on building, scaling and evolving customer-facing product systems, with practical AI capabilities integrated into applications rather than AI research. The posting specifies 4–8 years of experience in its detailed requirements; a separate listing label says 5+ years.

Responsibilities

  • Own backend product features from requirements and technical design through deployment and iteration. Build REST APIs, microservices and distributed systems that remain scalable, reliable and performant under high load.
  • Write maintainable, testable code; investigate production issues; improve performance; and contribute to architecture decisions and the longer-term product roadmap. Work with product managers, designers and QA to deliver features.
  • As a partial or good-to-have aspect of the role, integrate AI and LLM APIs into backend workflows. Potential use cases include automation, recommendations, summarization and chat flows. Validate AI outputs and implement retries and fallbacks in production; work with supporting data pipelines and structured or unstructured data; and help identify useful AI applications.

Required qualifications

Strong experience with Java and Spring Boot or Python; understanding of data structures, algorithms and system design; experience building scalable backend systems and APIs; knowledge of distributed systems and microservices; experience with databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL or MongoDB; and familiarity with AWS, Google Cloud or Azure.

Preferred, not mandatory: Basic experience with LLM APIs and an understanding of application-level AI integration. Familiarity with LangChain is optional. The posting also lists API Gateways, RAG and GenAI among its skills.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

JavaSpring BootPythonData structuresAlgorithmsSystem designREST APIsAPI GatewaysMicroservicesDistributed systemsPostgreSQLMySQLMongoDBAWSGoogle Cloud PlatformAzureLLM APIsLangChainRAGGenerative AIData pipelines

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Own customer-facing features end to end

    The posting emphasizes translating requirements into technical designs, then owning implementation, deployment and iteration. It also calls for working with product managers, designers and QA to deliver product value.

  • Build dependable backend systems

    Designing and scaling REST APIs, microservices and distributed systems is central to the role. The posting specifically calls for reliability and performance under high load.

  • Maintain and improve production quality

    The role includes writing testable, maintainable code, debugging production issues, improving performance and contributing to architecture decisions.

  • Integrate AI where it adds product value

    Practical AI/LLM API integration is described as partial or good to have, not the core engineering requirement. The posting mentions product use cases and handling AI outputs with validation, retries and fallbacks.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing delivery speed with system resilience

    Preparation hypothesis: End-to-end feature ownership may require trading off a fast release against testing, scalability and operational safeguards. Prepare an example of how you made that trade-off and adjusted a feature after deployment.

  • Diagnosing issues across services

    Preparation hypothesis: High-load APIs and distributed systems can make it difficult to distinguish a code defect from a database, dependency or capacity bottleneck. Prepare a concrete production-debugging approach, including how you would measure the result of a fix.

  • Making AI outputs safe to use in a product flow

    Preparation hypothesis: An LLM response may be useful but unsuitable for direct use in a backend workflow. Prepare to explain when you would validate it, retry, fall back or avoid AI altogether; the posting frames this as practical integration rather than AI research.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you turn a customer-facing feature request into a backend design and release plan?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Clarify user value and requirements, then describe API and data design, testing, deployment, and iteration. Explain how you would make trade-offs between delivery speed, reliability, and future changes.

How would you design a REST API for a product feature that needs to evolve?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Discuss resource boundaries, request validation, error responses, and compatibility for existing clients. Explain how you would keep the implementation maintainable and testable in Java with Spring Boot or Python.

How would you design microservices to remain reliable under high load?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Explain service boundaries, communication, failure handling, and how you would identify capacity limits. Compare the benefits of separating services with the operational complexity that separation introduces.

How would you investigate a production performance issue in a backend service?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Describe how you would narrow down the affected requests and bottleneck, form a hypothesis, and verify a fix. Address how to protect users while diagnosing the issue and how to check whether performance improved.

How would you choose and design database storage for a new product feature?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Compare a relational option such as PostgreSQL or MySQL with MongoDB based on the feature’s data and access patterns. Discuss queries, data consistency, and how the design would hold up as usage grows.

What data-structure or algorithm choices could matter in a high-traffic backend workflow?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Use a concrete hypothetical workflow to compare time and memory costs, including what changes as input size or request volume grows. Explain how you would confirm that an optimization addresses a real bottleneck.

How would you use a cloud platform when deploying and operating a backend service?

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Use AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure as an example and discuss deployment, scaling, and observing service health. Keep the answer grounded in platform concepts you know rather than assuming this role uses a particular service.

How would you integrate an LLM API into a customer-facing backend workflow?

What to coverSuggested answer focus for this good-to-have area: Describe where the API call belongs, how its output reaches the application, and how you would validate it. Discuss retries and fallbacks when the provider fails or returns an unusable response.

How would you prepare structured or unstructured data for an AI-enabled product feature?

What to coverSuggested answer focus for this good-to-have area: Describe a data flow that makes relevant inputs available to an AI feature such as summarization or recommendations. Explain how you would check input quality and whether the resulting output is useful to the user.

How would you decide whether an AI capability adds value to an existing product workflow?

What to coverSuggested answer focus for this good-to-have area: Compare an AI-enabled approach with a simpler alternative using the user need, output quality, latency, and failure handling. Explain what you would measure before expanding the feature.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a feature you owned from requirements through deployment and iteration.

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Give the situation and user need, the design and delivery actions you took, and the result after release. Be specific about your own decisions and what feedback changed in a later iteration.

Describe a time you worked with product, design, or QA to resolve a delivery trade-off.

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Set out the competing priorities, how you worked with others to decide, and the resulting product or delivery outcome. Distinguish your contribution from the team’s shared work.

Tell me about a production issue you helped resolve.

What to coverSuggested answer focus: Explain the impact and your role, the steps you took to diagnose and address the issue, and the result. Include what the team changed afterward to reduce recurrence, if applicable.

Describe an architecture decision where you balanced an immediate feature need with longer-term maintainability.

What to coverSuggested answer focus: State the situation and options, your reasoning and actions, and the outcome for users or the system. Acknowledge a trade-off or uncertainty rather than presenting the decision as cost-free.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Scalable system design

    Required: system design and scalable backend systems. Sketch a customer-facing service under high load; explain how you would identify bottlenecks and balance performance, reliability and maintainability.

  • Distributed systems and microservices

    Required: strong knowledge of distributed systems and microservices. Draw a request path across two services and discuss what happens when one service is slow or unavailable.

  • Data structures and algorithms

    Required: solid understanding of both. Work through an algorithm for processing a large set of product records; compare its time and space costs with an alternative.

  • Database design trade-offs

    Required: experience with databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL or MongoDB. Model data for a customer-facing feature and explain your choice of database, queries and likely scaling concerns.

  • Cloud deployment concepts

    Required: familiarity with AWS, GCP or Azure. Using one listed platform, outline how you would deploy a backend service and reason about reliability and performance without assuming a particular company setup.

  • Application-level AI integration

    Nice to have, not mandatory: LLM APIs and practical AI integration. Sketch a summarization or chat workflow and explain where output validation, retries and fallbacks belong; this is not an AI-research role.

Skills to revise

  • Build a backend API

    Core role responsibility: implement a small REST feature in Java with Spring Boot or in Python, then explain its request handling and how you would keep the code maintainable. The posting offers these language alternatives; it does not require both.

  • Test a product feature

    Core role responsibility: add tests for successful requests, invalid inputs and a dependency failure in your sample API. Explain how the tests support the posting’s emphasis on testable code.

  • Investigate a performance issue

    Core role responsibility: take a deliberately slow API request, trace the likely bottleneck through application logic and database access, and propose a measurable improvement. This rehearses production debugging and performance work.

  • Take a feature through delivery

    Core role responsibility: turn a short product requirement into a technical design, implementation plan, deployment checklist and post-release iteration proposal. Note what you would clarify with product, design and QA.

  • Handle an AI API response safely

    Optional AI preparation: add an LLM API call to a sample backend workflow and exercise invalid output, failed requests, retries and a fallback. This reflects the posting’s partial, good-to-have AI-integration duties, not a mandatory qualification.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Prepare an end-to-end feature walkthrough

    Choose a real backend feature you can discuss, if available. Show how requirements became a technical design, implementation, deployment and iteration, including how you worked with product, design or QA. These stages reflect the posted responsibilities.

  • Practice a high-load API design

    As a preparation exercise, sketch a REST API and microservice design. Explain database choices, distributed-system trade-offs, scaling, reliability and performance; the posting names these as core engineering areas.

  • Gather core engineering evidence

    Prepare concise examples of Java with Spring Boot or Python, testable code, database work and cloud-platform familiarity. Review a data-structures or algorithms decision you can explain; these are listed qualifications.

  • Rehearse a production-issue explanation

    Prepare a real incident walkthrough, if available, covering investigation, root cause, fix and measured performance or reliability impact. Debugging production issues and improving performance are stated duties.

  • Sketch an optional AI-integration approach

    Because AI integration is described as partial or good to have, prepare a small hypothetical backend use case only if useful. Show where an LLM API adds product value and how you would validate outputs, retry, fall back and handle supporting data.

  • Write questions for Saarthee

    Ask which customer-facing systems need the most work, how feature ownership and architecture decisions are shared, and what AI integration is planned versus already in use. You can also clarify the page’s 4–8-year range and separate 5+ years label.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 5 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…