New opportunity

Responsible AI Tech Lead

Accenture · Chennai, India

About this role

Accenture seeks a Responsible AI Tech Lead in Chennai to architect and deploy Microsoft-based agentic AI solutions while ensuring that AI projects meet ethical principles, governance policies, and regulatory requirements. The role combines technical leadership in multi-agent systems with responsibility for ethical AI adoption.

Responsibilities

  • Design scalable multi-agent systems and integrate AI-powered applications into enterprise environments using Microsoft AI Foundry, Semantic Kernel, AutoGen, Copilot Studio, and Azure AI services.
  • Lead architectural and technical decisions across projects; work with engineering and product teams to deliver GenAI and agentic solutions with measurable business impact.
  • Define and implement Responsible AI practices throughout the solution lifecycle. Evaluate performance and recommend improvements to scalability, accuracy, and compliance.
  • Mentor teams on agentic AI design, orchestration, and deployment, and lead knowledge-sharing and training on Microsoft's agentic AI stack.

Requirements

  • Expertise in Microsoft Agentic AI Architecture and the listed Microsoft AI tools and services; knowledge of LLM and SLM fine-tuning, deployment, and enterprise integration; experience designing agentic AI architectures; and hands-on Python and Visual Studio Code experience.
  • Understanding of Responsible AI frameworks, governance, and AI regulatory requirements, with cross-functional collaboration, problem-solving, and decision-making abilities.
  • The posting states 13+ years of total IT experience, including minimums of 8 years in Microsoft AI, 2 years in Agentic AI Architecture, and 10+ years in Azure PaaS. It also separately states a minimum of 7.5 years and lists 5–10 years in the job header.
  • 15 years of full-time education is required. The position is listed as full-time.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Microsoft Agentic AI ArchitectureMicrosoft AI FoundrySemantic KernelAutoGenCopilot StudioAzure AI servicesAzure PaaSLarge Language Models (LLMs)Small Language Models (SLMs)Multi-agent systemsAgentic AI architectureResponsible AIAI governanceModel fine-tuningPythonVisual Studio Code

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Architect Microsoft-based multi-agent solutions

    The posting calls for designing and deploying scalable multi-agent systems using Microsoft AI Foundry, Semantic Kernel, AutoGen, Copilot Studio, and Azure AI services, then integrating them into enterprise environments.

  • Embed Responsible AI throughout delivery

    The role defines and implements Responsible AI practices across solution lifecycles, aligning solutions with ethical principles, governance policies, and regulatory requirements.

  • Deliver measurable business impact

    The lead works with engineering and product teams to deliver GenAI and agentic solutions with measurable business impact, while making architectural decisions across projects and teams.

  • Improve deployed solutions

    The posting calls for evaluating performance and recommending improvements to scalability, accuracy, and compliance. It also emphasizes LLM and SLM fine-tuning, deployment, and enterprise integration.

  • Build team capability

    The lead mentors teams on agentic system design, orchestration, and deployment, and facilitates knowledge-sharing and training on the Microsoft agentic AI stack.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing agent capability with oversight

    Preparation hypothesis, not a stated employer problem: more capable multi-agent workflows may be harder to govern and evaluate. Prepare to explain how you would make design decisions that preserve useful behavior while addressing Responsible AI and compliance requirements.

  • Trading off accuracy and scalability

    Preparation hypothesis: performance improvements may not improve every measure at once, particularly when choosing how to deploy or integrate LLMs and SLMs. Prepare a framework for evaluating accuracy, scalability, and compliance together rather than optimizing one in isolation.

  • Aligning decisions across teams

    Preparation hypothesis: architectural choices spanning multiple projects may require reconciling product goals, engineering constraints, and governance needs. Prepare to describe how you would make and communicate a technical decision, establish its business measure, and help teams adopt it.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

Suggested practice question: How would you architect a scalable multi-agent solution?

What to coverDescribe agent responsibilities, orchestration, shared context, and boundaries with enterprise systems. Explain how you would assess scalability and prevent unnecessary agent complexity.

Suggested practice question: How would you choose an approach to agent orchestration?

What to coverThe posting names Semantic Kernel and AutoGen. Compare where each might fit in a design, and explain what evidence you would seek before making an architectural choice.

Suggested practice question: How would you select components from Microsoft's AI stack?

What to coverDiscuss how you would evaluate Microsoft AI Foundry, Copilot Studio, and Azure AI services against an application's needs. Address integration, operational control, and Responsible AI considerations rather than assuming every solution needs every tool.

Suggested practice question: How would you integrate an agentic application into an enterprise environment?

What to coverOutline the interfaces, deployment boundaries, and operational dependencies you would clarify with engineering teams. Explain how Azure PaaS experience would inform reliability and scalability decisions.

Suggested practice question: When would you choose an LLM rather than an SLM?

What to coverCompare the models against the task's accuracy, latency, scale, and deployment needs. Explain how you would test the choice using representative enterprise use cases.

Suggested practice question: How would you decide whether to fine-tune a model?

What to coverThe posting calls for knowledge of LLM and SLM fine-tuning, deployment, and integration. Discuss the evidence needed to justify fine-tuning, how you would evaluate its effect, and how deployment constraints could change the decision.

Suggested practice question: How would you embed Responsible AI across a solution lifecycle?

What to coverDescribe checks you would apply from design through deployment and ongoing evaluation. Connect ethical principles to concrete design decisions and explain how you would revisit them as a solution changes.

Suggested practice question: How would you handle governance and regulatory requirements in an AI design?

What to coverExplain how you would identify applicable requirements with the relevant teams and translate them into design and review criteria. Distinguish demonstrable compliance evidence from an unsupported claim that a system is compliant.

Suggested practice question: How would you evaluate and improve a deployed agentic solution?

What to coverPropose measures for accuracy, scalability, compliance, and business impact, all areas named in the posting. Explain how you would diagnose a weak result and prioritize improvements when measures conflict.

Suggested practice question: How would you troubleshoot agent behavior during development?

What to coverUse the posting's Python and Visual Studio Code requirements as the basis for a practical debugging discussion. Describe how you would isolate an issue in agent logic, orchestration, or an integrated service and verify a fix.

Behavioural practice

Suggested practice question: Tell me about a cross-functional AI delivery decision.

What to coverUse a real situation involving engineering and product perspectives, then explain your actions to align technical choices with a measurable objective. State the result and any trade-off that remained.

Suggested practice question: Describe a consequential architecture decision you led.

What to coverGive the situation and competing options, your role in evaluating them, and how you communicated the decision across teams or projects. Explain the outcome using evidence available from the work.

Suggested practice question: Tell me about a time you raised a Responsible AI concern.

What to coverDescribe the situation, the concern, and the actions you took with relevant stakeholders. Explain the resulting design or governance decision without claiming a risk was eliminated unless you can substantiate it.

Suggested practice question: How have you helped a team adopt a complex technical approach?

What to coverUse a real mentoring or knowledge-sharing example: describe the team's starting point, what you taught or changed, and the result. Relate the example to the posting's emphasis on agentic design, orchestration, deployment, and training.

Suggested practice question: Describe a time solution performance fell short.

What to coverExplain the situation and your role in diagnosing the problem, then describe how you chose among improvements to accuracy, scalability, or compliance. State the measured result and what you learned from any remaining limitation.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Multi-agent architecture and orchestration

    The posting requires Microsoft Agentic AI Architecture and design of scalable multi-agent systems. Revise by sketching an enterprise use case with agent responsibilities, orchestration, failure handling, and integration boundaries; explain the architectural trade-offs.

  • Microsoft agentic AI stack

    The posting names Microsoft AI Foundry, Semantic Kernel, AutoGen, Copilot Studio, and Azure AI services. Revise each tool’s role by mapping the named stack onto one proposed solution and explaining why each selected component belongs there.

  • LLM and SLM lifecycle

    The posting calls for knowledge of LLM and SLM fine-tuning, deployment, and enterprise integration. Revise by comparing when you would use each model type in one enterprise scenario, including deployment and integration trade-offs.

  • Responsible AI governance

    The role explicitly covers ethical principles, governance policies, and regulatory requirements across the solution lifecycle. Revise by tracing a hypothetical agentic solution from design to deployment and identifying governance decisions and compliance questions at each stage.

  • Azure PaaS and solution performance

    The posting specifies extensive Azure PaaS experience and asks for improvements to scalability, accuracy, and compliance. Revise by outlining how you would diagnose a solution that performs well in a pilot but degrades as enterprise use grows.

Skills to revise

  • Prototype in Python and Visual Studio Code

    Hands-on Python and Visual Studio Code experience is explicitly listed. As a preparation exercise, build a small mock agent workflow in those tools and be ready to explain its control flow, error handling, and limitations; the mock workflow is a suggestion, not a stated project requirement.

  • Defend a technical architecture

    The role leads architectural decisions across projects and teams. Practice presenting a proposed multi-agent design using the posting’s Microsoft stack, then defend choices about orchestration, enterprise integration, and scalability against two alternatives.

  • Evaluate and improve an AI solution

    The posting calls for continuous evaluation of scalability, accuracy, and compliance. Practice defining measures for all three, reviewing hypothetical results, and prioritizing specific changes while stating the trade-offs.

  • Translate governance into delivery decisions

    The role implements Responsible AI practices and works with engineering and product teams. Practice a cross-functional design review: identify an ethical or compliance concern, propose a design change, and explain how you would communicate its impact on delivery and business outcomes.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map the stated requirements

    Prepare a brief evidence sheet for Microsoft Agentic AI Architecture, the listed tools, Azure PaaS, Python and Visual Studio Code. Record your actual experience dates and education without assuming the posting’s differing experience figures are equivalent.

  • Build an architecture walkthrough

    Prepare a diagram and concise explanation of a multi-agent solution you have worked on, or a clearly labeled hypothetical design. Cover orchestration, enterprise integration, deployment, scalability and key technical trade-offs.

  • Demonstrate the Microsoft stack

    Prepare a focused code or design walkthrough showing your hands-on use of relevant tools among Microsoft AI Foundry, Semantic Kernel, AutoGen, Copilot Studio and Azure AI services. Be clear about which tools you have used directly.

  • Explain model decisions

    Prepare one example of how you would choose between an LLM and an SLM, including whether fine-tuning is warranted and how the model would be deployed and integrated into an enterprise system.

  • Show Responsible AI decisions

    Prepare a lifecycle-based example of identifying an ethical or governance risk, selecting a control, and evaluating its effectiveness. Distinguish requirements you know from regulatory details you would need to verify.

  • Connect leadership to outcomes

    Prepare a project account covering an architectural decision, collaboration with engineering and product teams, mentoring or knowledge-sharing, and the measures used to assess business impact, accuracy, scalability or compliance.

  • Prepare questions for Accenture

    Ask which Microsoft tools the team uses, how Responsible AI reviews are handled, and what outcomes matter most for this role. Request clarification of the posting’s 5–10-year header, 7.5-year minimum and separate 13-plus-year experience statement.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 4 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…