New opportunity

Sr Specialist AI Engineer

Nasdaq · Bangalore, India

About this role

Nasdaq seeks a Sr Specialist AI Engineer in Bangalore to lead the design, development, deployment and support of enterprise AI solutions. Reporting to the Head of Market Data and AI Enablement, the role focuses on agentic AI, large language models (LLMs), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and intelligent automation to improve business outcomes and engineering productivity.

Responsibilities

  • Build intelligent assistants, copilots, autonomous agents and workflow automation platforms. Develop multi-agent systems with planning, reasoning, memory and tool orchestration.
  • Build RAG systems using embeddings, vector databases, enterprise content and knowledge repositories. Integrate AI solutions with applications, APIs, databases and cloud platforms.
  • Establish evaluation frameworks covering answer relevancy, faithfulness, grounding, latency, safety and business impact. Implement observability, monitoring, governance and security controls for production systems.
  • Work with business and technology stakeholders to translate requirements into scalable solutions. Mentor engineers, establish architecture and engineering practices, and evaluate emerging AI models and frameworks.

Required qualifications

  • Bachelor's or Master's degree in Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, Engineering, Information Technology or a related field; 5-8 years of software engineering experience, including hands-on development of AI-powered applications.
  • Strong Python and software engineering skills; hands-on experience with LLMs such as GPT, Claude, Gemini or Llama, and orchestration frameworks such as LangGraph, LangChain, AutoGen, CrewAI, Semantic Kernel or LlamaIndex.
  • Understanding of agentic architectures, tool calling, memory, reasoning and workflow automation; experience building RAG applications with vector databases and semantic search. Experience with AI-assisted development tools such as GitHub Copilot, Claude Code or Cursor, plus communication and stakeholder management skills.

Preferred

Financial services, capital markets or FinTech experience; evaluation tools such as DeepEval, Ragas or LangSmith; exposure to LLMOps, MLOps, Responsible AI and AI governance; and knowledge graphs, graph databases or enterprise search.

This full-time role offers hybrid working and a flexible schedule. Listed benefits include an annual bonus, discounted employee stock purchase program, health insurance, up to six paid flex days annually in addition to standard vacation and holidays, mentorship and online learning resources. Applications should be submitted in English.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

PythonLarge Language ModelsAgentic AIRetrieval-Augmented GenerationMulti-agent systemsVector databasesEmbeddingsSemantic searchAI evaluationAI observabilityAI governanceAI securityAPI integrationCloud platformsGPTClaudeGeminiLlamaLangGraphLangChainAutoGenCrewAISemantic KernelLlamaIndexGitHub CopilotClaude CodeCursorStakeholder managementDeepEvalRagas Dashboard?

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Lead agentic AI delivery

    The role leads the design, deployment and support of enterprise assistants, copilots, autonomous agents and workflow automation, including multi-agent planning, memory and tool orchestration. For preparation, be ready to explain architectural choices and how a system moves from prototype to supported production use.

  • Build enterprise RAG systems

    The posting calls for RAG built on embeddings, vector databases, semantic search and enterprise content repositories. For preparation, trace how content becomes retrievable, how responses stay grounded in it and how the system is maintained.

  • Measure AI quality and impact

    The role establishes evaluation frameworks for relevancy, faithfulness, grounding, latency, safety and business impact. For preparation, outline how to test these dimensions together rather than treating answer quality as the only measure.

  • Operate secure, integrated AI systems

    Responsibilities include integration with applications, APIs, databases and cloud platforms, plus observability, monitoring, governance and security controls. For preparation, explain how integration and operational controls shape a production architecture.

  • Translate needs and set engineering direction

    The role partners with business and technology stakeholders, mentors engineers, promotes architecture practices and evaluates emerging models and frameworks. For preparation, focus on how to turn a business need into a scoped solution and justify adoption decisions to both technical and nontechnical stakeholders.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Autonomy versus control

    A likely design challenge, not a stated employer problem: multi-agent planning and tool use can make automation more capable while making actions harder to constrain and diagnose. Prepare a decision framework for when to use an agent versus a simpler workflow, including tool boundaries, failure handling and observability.

  • Grounding versus responsiveness

    A likely trade-off: retrieving and checking enterprise content can improve faithfulness, while adding latency and retrieval failure modes. Prepare to explain how you would evaluate retrieval quality and grounded answers alongside response time, then adjust the design based on those results.

  • Innovation versus production readiness

    The posting pairs evaluation of emerging models and frameworks with security, governance, operational excellence and measurable outcomes. A likely challenge is deciding when a new capability merits adoption. Prepare criteria for comparing it with an existing approach using quality, safety, integration effort, maintainability and business impact.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you design an enterprise AI assistant from development through production support?

What to coverThe role covers designing, deploying, and supporting intelligent assistants and copilots. Preparation suggestion: Explain the system boundaries, tool access, failure handling, testing, and how you would operate it after release.

When would you use a multi-agent system rather than a single agent?

What to coverThe posting names planning, reasoning, memory, and tool orchestration as multi-agent capabilities. Preparation suggestion: Discuss how agents would divide work, coordinate state and tools, and justify the added complexity against a simpler workflow.

How would you build a RAG system over enterprise content?

What to coverThe role calls for embeddings, vector databases, semantic search, and knowledge repositories. Preparation suggestion: Walk through content ingestion, retrieval, answer grounding, and how you would handle changing or access-restricted content.

How would you diagnose a RAG answer that is relevant but not faithful to its sources?

What to coverThe posting explicitly calls for measuring relevancy, faithfulness, and grounding. Preparation suggestion: Separate retrieval failures from generation failures, inspect the retrieved evidence, and explain how you would test a proposed fix.

How would you evaluate an AI workflow before and after deployment?

What to coverThe role requires evaluation of answer quality, latency, safety, and business impact; tools such as DeepEval, Ragas, and LangSmith are listed as preferred experience. Preparation suggestion: Describe a representative test set, metrics and review methods, and the trade-offs between quality, speed, and measurable value.

What observability, security, and governance controls would you put around an agentic system?

What to coverThe posting calls for monitoring, governance, security controls, and production operational practices. Preparation suggestion: Explain what you would log and monitor, how you would limit data and tool access, and how you would investigate unsafe or unexpected behavior.

How would you integrate an AI workflow with enterprise applications and data systems?

What to coverIntegration with applications, APIs, databases, and cloud platforms is a stated duty. Preparation suggestion: Discuss interface design, permissions, error handling, and how you would make tool calls reliable without assuming a particular vendor stack.

How would you choose an LLM and orchestration framework for a proposed solution?

What to coverThe posting lists several foundation models and orchestration frameworks and asks the role to evaluate emerging options. Preparation suggestion: Compare candidates against task quality, latency, operational complexity, security needs, and the effort of changing models or frameworks later.

How would you maintain Python code quality while using AI-assisted development tools?

What to coverStrong Python engineering and hands-on use of AI-assisted development tools are stated expectations. Preparation suggestion: Explain how you would review generated code, test AI-powered application behavior, and prevent tool output from bypassing engineering standards.

How would you determine whether an AI automation initiative improved productivity?

What to coverThe role aims to improve engineering productivity, software quality, and operational efficiency through automation. Preparation suggestion: Define a baseline and outcome measures, account for review and maintenance effort, and explain when a simpler automation approach would be preferable.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you turned an ambiguous stakeholder need into an engineering plan.

What to coverThe role partners with business and technology stakeholders to translate requirements into scalable solutions. Preparation suggestion: Use a real situation, describe how you clarified needs and made trade-offs, and state the result.

Tell me about a time you mentored engineers or improved a shared engineering practice.

What to coverMentoring and promoting architecture patterns and AI engineering standards are stated duties. Preparation suggestion: Describe the situation, what you did to help others adopt the practice, and the observable result.

Tell me about a time you coordinated delivery across teams with different priorities.

What to coverThe posting describes working closely with global teams and stakeholders. Preparation suggestion: Give a real example of the competing priorities, your communication and decisions, and the delivery outcome.

Tell me about a time you handled a production issue or operational risk.

What to coverThe role includes supporting production AI systems and establishing operational excellence. Preparation suggestion: Explain the situation, your actions to contain and resolve the issue, and what changed afterward.

Tell me about a time you evaluated a new technology before recommending adoption.

What to coverEvaluating emerging AI models and frameworks and driving appropriate adoption are stated responsibilities. Preparation suggestion: Describe the decision context, evidence and trade-offs you presented, and the result, including a decision not to adopt if that was warranted.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Agentic and multi-agent architecture

    Sketch an assistant with planning, reasoning, memory and tool calling; explain when multiple agents improve a workflow and when they add unnecessary complexity. These capabilities are explicit responsibilities.

  • RAG and semantic search design

    Diagram how enterprise content becomes embeddings, is retrieved through a vector database and grounds an answer; identify where retrieval or grounding can fail. The role builds and maintains RAG systems.

  • LLM and orchestration choices

    Compare two of the listed foundation models and explain how you would evaluate an orchestration framework for an assistant. The posting expects hands-on LLM experience and experience with frameworks such as LangGraph or LangChain.

  • AI evaluation

    Draft a scorecard that distinguishes answer relevancy, faithfulness, grounding, latency, safety and business impact. The role explicitly creates evaluation frameworks covering all six.

  • Production architecture and controls

    Review a proposed AI workflow and identify what needs monitoring, observability, governance and security controls before deployment. The posting calls for scalable, secure systems that can be supported in production.

  • Stakeholder and engineering leadership

    Practice turning an ambiguous business request into a scoped architecture proposal with success measures, then explain the engineering practices you would ask a team to follow. The role partners with stakeholders, mentors engineers and establishes best practices.

Skills to revise

  • Python agent implementation

    Build a small Python assistant using one orchestration framework named in the posting; implement a tool call, a memory decision and a test for a failed tool response. Python, orchestration and agent capabilities are explicit expectations.

  • RAG pipeline construction

    Using sample content, build an embedding and vector-search pipeline that returns retrieved passages with an answer; inspect a case where the evidence is insufficient. This practices the advertised RAG and semantic-search work.

  • Evaluation harness

    Create a small set of test questions and record grounding, faithfulness, relevancy, latency and safety results for two answer variants. The role requires evaluation frameworks; DeepEval, Ragas and LangSmith are listed only as good-to-have tools.

  • Enterprise integration and operations

    Prototype an AI workflow that calls a sample API or database, records observable failures and handles an unsuccessful integration safely. The posting explicitly covers integrations, monitoring and security controls.

  • AI-assisted development

    Use one listed tool—GitHub Copilot, Claude Code or Cursor—to draft a small Python change, then review, test and correct its output. Hands-on use of AI-assisted development tools is an explicit expectation.

  • Technical communication and mentoring

    Rehearse a short design review: explain trade-offs to a business stakeholder and give an engineer actionable feedback on the same design. Communication, stakeholder management and mentoring are stated parts of the role.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map the role requirements to evidence

    Prepare a one-page inventory of examples you can substantiate for Python, AI-powered applications, LLMs, orchestration frameworks, RAG and AI-assisted development tools. Mark financial-services and governance experience separately as preferred, not required.

  • Rehearse an agentic AI project walkthrough

    If you have a relevant project, prepare a concise account of its objective, your decisions, tool calling or orchestration, integrations, deployment and measurable outcome. The role includes assistants, copilots, autonomous agents and workflow automation.

  • Practice a RAG architecture exercise

    Sketch how you would connect enterprise content to an assistant through embeddings, semantic search and a vector database. Explain source updates, access controls and trade-offs; present this as a proposed design, not a Nasdaq system.

  • Draft an evaluation and production-readiness plan

    Create a sample test matrix for relevancy, faithfulness, grounding, latency and safety, with a way to assess business impact. Add proposed monitoring, security and governance controls for deployment and support.

  • Prepare a Python engineering example

    Select code or a design you can discuss that illustrates maintainability, testing and integration with APIs, databases or cloud platforms. Be ready to explain any LLM model, framework or AI-assisted development tool you actually used.

  • Develop stakeholder and mentoring stories

    Prepare specific examples, if available, of turning business needs into technical requirements, explaining architecture choices and helping other engineers adopt practices. These reflect the role’s stakeholder and mentoring responsibilities.

  • Write questions for the employer

    Ask which AI workflows are priorities, how success and production safety are measured, what enterprise content and integrations are in scope, and how the team makes model and framework decisions.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Oct 1, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 4 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…