New opportunity

Software Engineer, AI/ML, PhD, Early Career, 2026

Google · Bengaluru, India

About this role

Google seeks a PhD software engineer for its Google Cloud AI and Infrastructure (AI2) organization in Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. The team develops AI/ML capabilities and the software, hardware, and ML systems infrastructure behind Google services and Google Cloud products. The role applies research expertise to large-scale problems across AI/ML, networking, data storage, security, and distributed systems.

Responsibilities

  • Design, test, deploy, and maintain software solutions; write product or system development code.
  • Collaborate on design and code reviews to support accuracy, testability, efficiency, and engineering best practices.
  • Update documentation and educational content in response to product changes and user feedback.
  • Triage, investigate, debug, and resolve product or system issues, including their effects on hardware, networks, services, and quality.
  • Implement solutions in specialized ML areas, use ML infrastructure, and contribute to model optimization and data processing.

Minimum qualifications:

  • PhD in Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, or a related technical field.
  • 1 year of experience in at least one of speech/audio, reinforcement learning, ML infrastructure, or another ML specialization; and 1 year of experience with ML infrastructure, such as model deployment, evaluation, optimization, data processing, or debugging.
  • Coding experience in a language such as C, C++, Python, Java, or Golang.

Preferred qualifications

  • 2 years of experience with data structures and algorithms; experience in fields such as AI, machine learning, distributed systems, networking, databases, compilers, or general systems.
  • Peer-reviewed publications in prestigious conferences or journals and availability to begin a full-time position in 2026.

English proficiency is required. The hiring process requires in-person interviews in most instances.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Machine LearningML infrastructureModel deploymentModel evaluationModel optimizationData processingDebuggingSpeech and audio MLReinforcement learningCC++PythonJavaGolangData structuresAlgorithmsDistributed systemsNetworkingData storageSoftware testingCode review

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Build and maintain software solutions

    The role calls for writing product or system code and designing, testing, deploying, and maintaining software. Prepare to explain engineering decisions across that lifecycle, not only a research result.

  • Apply specialized ML work through infrastructure

    The posting calls for implementing solutions in an ML specialization, using ML infrastructure, and contributing to model optimization and data processing. Prepare a concrete account of how an ML idea was evaluated, implemented, and debugged.

  • Review for correctness and efficiency

    Design and code reviews with peers and stakeholders are a stated duty, with attention to accuracy, testability, efficiency, and engineering practices. Prepare to explain trade-offs and how feedback changed a design.

  • Diagnose system-level issues

    The role includes tracing and resolving issues while considering effects on hardware, networks, services, and quality. Prepare to describe a methodical investigation that distinguishes symptoms from root causes.

  • Keep technical guidance current

    The posting calls for updating documentation or educational content as products change and users provide feedback. Prepare an example of making technical guidance accurate and usable after a change.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Turning research into maintainable code

    Likely preparation challenge, not a confirmed team problem: a specialized ML approach may need to balance model gains against testability and ongoing maintenance. Prepare to explain what you would measure, test, and simplify before deployment.

  • Finding causes across system boundaries

    Likely preparation challenge, not a confirmed team problem: an ML or service symptom may have causes in data processing, infrastructure, networking, or hardware. Practice explaining how you would narrow the fault domain and assess service-quality impact before changing a component.

  • Choosing among scale-related trade-offs

    Likely preparation challenge, not a confirmed team problem: the AI2 work spans large-scale ML and systems infrastructure, where optimization can conflict with accuracy or operational efficiency. Prepare to state assumptions, compare alternatives, and identify evidence needed to choose.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you choose a data structure and algorithm for a component that must handle large volumes of requests?

What to coverThe posting lists data structures and algorithms as a preferred qualification and describes systems operating at massive scale. Suggested preparation: explain complexity, memory use, and how you would test whether the choice meets the workload's needs.

How would you turn a finding from your ML research area into a software solution?

What to coverThe role calls for applying specialized research expertise to real-world problems. Suggested preparation: explain the underlying idea, what changes when implementing it in a system, and how you would validate its usefulness.

How would you evaluate a model before and after a change?

What to coverModel evaluation is explicitly named as ML infrastructure experience. Suggested preparation: describe suitable metrics for the task, representative data, and how you would distinguish a meaningful improvement from a regression.

What checks would you build into data processing for an ML system?

What to coverThe responsibilities include data processing and ML infrastructure work. Suggested preparation: discuss data quality, consistency between processing stages, and how you would detect changes that affect model results.

How would you optimize a model while preserving its quality?

What to coverContributing to model optimization is a stated responsibility. Suggested preparation: explain how you would measure quality and resource costs, compare alternatives, and verify the trade-off after a change.

What would you consider when deploying and maintaining a model-backed software solution?

What to coverThe posting names model deployment and asks engineers to design, test, deploy, and maintain software. Suggested preparation: cover validation before deployment, monitoring after deployment, and how you would respond if behavior degrades.

How would you design an ML-related service for operation at large scale?

What to coverThe AI2 description emphasizes software and ML systems infrastructure at unprecedented scale, including distributed systems. Suggested preparation: explain capacity and reliability trade-offs, identify likely bottlenecks, and describe how you would test your assumptions.

How would you investigate a quality regression that could originate in software, hardware, or networking?

What to coverThe responsibilities explicitly call for triaging issues and analyzing their effects on hardware, networks, services, and quality. Suggested preparation: describe how you would narrow the fault, gather evidence across layers, and verify a fix.

How would you test product or system code so that changes remain accurate and maintainable?

What to coverThe role includes testing software, while reviews emphasize accuracy and testability. Suggested preparation: distinguish tests for component behavior from tests across system boundaries, and explain how you would investigate a failing test.

What trade-offs would you raise during a design or code review?

What to coverThe posting calls for reviews covering style, accuracy, testability, and efficiency. Suggested preparation: explain how you would assess those concerns against the change's purpose and make feedback actionable without assuming a particular tool or process.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you translated a research idea into working software.

What to coverThe role connects PhD research expertise with software implementation. Suggested preparation: use a real situation, your specific actions, and the result; explain what you changed when the idea met practical constraints.

Describe a time a design or code review changed your approach.

What to coverCollaboration with peers and stakeholders through reviews is a stated responsibility. Suggested preparation: describe the situation, how you handled feedback or disagreement, and the resulting change to the work.

Tell me about a difficult system issue you investigated.

What to coverThe posting calls for triaging, debugging, tracking, and resolving product or system issues. Suggested preparation: give a real situation, the evidence you gathered and actions you took, and the outcome or remaining uncertainty.

Describe a time user feedback or a product change led you to improve documentation.

What to coverUpdating documentation or educational content in response to changes and feedback is part of the role. Suggested preparation: explain the original gap, what you revised, and how you assessed whether the revision helped.

Tell me about a time you had to contribute outside your main technical specialty.

What to coverThe posting describes versatile engineers working across AI/ML and systems areas. Suggested preparation: choose a real situation, explain how you learned enough to contribute and collaborated with others, and state the result without overstating your role.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • ML infrastructure lifecycle

    Revision exercise (suggested): Explain how data processing, model evaluation, deployment, optimization, and debugging fit together, including where failures can surface. Relevance: The posting requires experience with ML infrastructure and names these activities.

  • One ML specialization

    Revision exercise (suggested): Revisit a problem in one area you know—such as speech/audio, reinforcement learning, or another ML field—and explain its approach, evaluation, and limitations. Relevance: The posting requires experience in at least one specialization; it does not require all of them.

  • Large-scale systems trade-offs

    Revision exercise (suggested): Sketch how a service might handle growth and failures, then discuss trade-offs involving networking, data storage, or distributed systems. Relevance: AI2 develops infrastructure at scale, and the posting names these areas; this exercise is preparation, not a stated design requirement.

  • Data structures and algorithms

    Revision exercise (suggested): Compare two approaches to a data-processing problem by correctness, time complexity, and memory use. Relevance: Experience with data structures and algorithms is a preferred qualification.

Skills to revise

  • Implement and test code

    Revision exercise (suggested): In one language named in the posting, implement a small data-processing component and write tests for edge cases. Relevance: Coding experience is required, and the role writes and tests product or system code.

  • Evaluate and optimize a model

    Revision exercise (suggested): Define evaluation measures for a familiar model, inspect an error case, and propose one optimization with a way to check its effect. Relevance: The posting explicitly names model evaluation and optimization.

  • Triage a system issue

    Revision exercise (suggested): Given a hypothetical drop in service quality, write a short investigation plan that distinguishes software, hardware, and network causes and tracks the resolution. Relevance: The role investigates and resolves issues affecting those operations.

  • Review code and design

    Revision exercise (suggested): Review a short code change for accuracy, testability, and efficiency; record specific feedback and a proposed revision. Relevance: The role collaborates in design and code reviews against these criteria.

  • Update technical documentation

    Revision exercise (suggested): Revise a short usage note after a hypothetical product change, incorporating a piece of user feedback. Relevance: The role adapts documentation and educational content to updates and feedback.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map the stated qualifications to evidence

    Create a one-page reference to relevant PhD research, a year of work in an ML specialization, a year of ML infrastructure work, and coding experience. Note any relevant publications, algorithms or systems work, and 2026 start availability; the posting lists these last items as preferred.

  • Prepare a research-to-software walkthrough

    Choose one project and explain the research problem, your implementation, tests, results, and what changed when the work had to operate as software. This connects PhD expertise to the role’s design, deployment, and maintenance responsibilities.

  • Document an ML infrastructure example

    Prepare a concrete account of model deployment, evaluation, optimization, data processing, or debugging: architecture, metrics, trade-offs, your contribution, and an issue you resolved. These are examples named in the posting.

  • Practice coding and design review

    Work through a problem in a language you know, explaining data structures, complexity, tests, and edge cases. Then rehearse reviewing your solution for accuracy, testability, and efficiency, which the role explicitly emphasizes.

  • Sketch a large-scale ML system

    As a preparation exercise, draw a model-serving or data-processing design and discuss scaling, failure modes, observability, and effects on networks or services. Treat this as practice based on AI2’s stated infrastructure scope, not a stated interview exercise.

  • Rehearse an incident and documentation example

    Prepare a short walkthrough showing how you traced an issue, evaluated its operational impact, resolved it, and updated documentation or educational material after feedback. Both debugging and documentation are listed responsibilities.

  • Draft questions for the employer

    Ask which ML specialization and infrastructure problems this team prioritizes, how research becomes production code, and what the design and code review work involves. Confirm interview arrangements if needed; the posting says interviews are in person in most instances.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 4 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…