Technical practice
How would you formulate medical-image super-resolution as an inverse problem?
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain the assumed image-formation process, what information is lost, and how a reconstruction method uses data consistency and learned priors. Discuss how you would check for plausible-looking but unsupported detail.
When would you choose a diffusion model rather than a GAN for medical-image synthesis?
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Compare image quality, diversity, training behaviour and computational cost for a defined use case. Explain how you would test whether synthetic images preserve clinically relevant features.
How would you evaluate a model for segmentation, detection or measurement?
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Choose metrics that fit the output and explain what each metric misses. Discuss error analysis across image conditions and how measurement errors could affect downstream use.
How would you learn from limited or imperfect medical-image labels?
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Contrast semi-supervised and weakly supervised approaches, including how each uses unlabelled or coarse labels. Describe checks for label noise, leakage and misleading gains.
How would you adapt a foundation vision model to a medical-imaging task?
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Compare feature extraction, fine-tuning and training a task-specific model in terms of data, compute and domain shift. Explain how you would establish a simpler baseline before choosing an approach.
How would you design a vision-language approach to image-based report generation?
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe how image information and text would be connected, and where retrieval-augmented generation might help. Address factual grounding, unsupported statements and evaluation beyond fluent wording.
What would you consider when scaling up training of a medical-imaging model?
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Discuss data loading, memory use, batch size, optimisation and reproducibility as scale changes. Explain how you would distinguish a training bottleneck from a modelling problem.
How would you troubleshoot a reconstruction or segmentation model that performs well in training but poorly on new images?
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Investigate data splits, preprocessing, overfitting and differences in image characteristics. Prioritise diagnostic comparisons before changing the architecture.
How would you assess whether a published AI method improves a medical workflow?
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Compare it with relevant baselines using the same task definition and evaluation data. Distinguish model-level improvements from a demonstrated workflow benefit; the posting does not specify a particular workflow or success metric.
How would you structure an experiment across the frameworks and languages named in the posting?
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain how you would use tools such as PyTorch, TensorFlow, Keras, Python or C++ according to the experiment's needs, without assuming all are required in one project. Cover consistent preprocessing, tracked configurations and comparable results.
Behavioural practice
Tell me about a time you made progress on a vaguely defined research problem.
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Use a real situation to show how you clarified the objective, chose a first test and revised your approach. State the result and what remained uncertain.
Describe a time you worked with people from different technical disciplines.
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Give a situation, the actions you took to reconcile different assumptions or priorities, and the result. Keep the example relevant to collaborative research without claiming healthcare experience you have not established.
Tell me about a time you independently owned an experiment that did not work as expected.
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Explain the goal, how you diagnosed the result and what you changed or reported. Include the outcome, even if the finding was a limitation rather than an improvement.
Describe a time feedback changed your technical approach.
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Set out who raised the concern, how you evaluated it and what action followed. Explain the result, including how you communicated any remaining disagreement or uncertainty.
Tell me about a time you had to choose between exploring a new method and delivering a focused result.
What to coverPreparation suggestion: Describe the constraints, your prioritisation and the outcome. Explain how you decided whether further investigation of a published approach was worth the time.