Technical practice
How would you understand a messy CPA workflow before proposing a feature?
What to coverThe role involves translating CPA workflow problems into product work. Suggested preparation: explain how you would identify the accountant’s steps, inputs, decisions, and points of friction, then confirm your understanding with the accountant.
How would hands-on US tax or accounting work inform your product decisions?
What to coverThe posting expects comfort doing work comparable to a junior accountant. Suggested preparation: discuss how performing the underlying task would help you spot missing information, review needs, and errors in a proposed workflow.
How would you turn a discovery session into a focused feature proposal?
What to coverThe role calls for translating workflow discoveries into working demos and specifications. Suggested preparation: show how you would distinguish the core problem from adjacent requests and define what a first version must demonstrate.
How would you prompt an AI model for an accounting workflow?
What to coverThe posting calls for hands-on prompting of AI models. Suggested preparation: describe how you would give the model a clear task and relevant context, specify the expected output, and revise the prompt when results are incomplete or inaccurate.
How would you evaluate AI output for domain accuracy?
What to coverDomain accuracy is an explicit concern in the posting. Suggested preparation: explain what you would check against the underlying accounting work, how you would record errors, and when output should be reviewed rather than relied on.
What would you build to demonstrate a feature within days of discovery?
What to coverThe role calls for quickly building demoable versions of features. Suggested preparation: describe a narrow end-to-end prototype, what it would and would not prove, and how feedback would shape the next iteration.
What belongs in an engineering-ready specification for a CPA workflow?
What to coverThe posting specifically calls for clear edge cases in specifications. Suggested preparation: cover the intended user flow, inputs and outputs, and what should happen when information is missing, inconsistent, or outside the feature’s scope.
How would you write testable acceptance criteria for an AI-assisted feature?
What to coverTestable acceptance criteria are an explicit expectation. Suggested preparation: give criteria that distinguish an acceptable result from an inaccurate or incomplete one, including observable behavior for relevant edge cases.
How would you approach a technical design trade-off with engineers?
What to coverThe role involves technical design discussions and understanding trade-offs. Suggested preparation: compare options in terms of delivery speed, domain accuracy, and what the demo or feature needs to establish; identify questions you would resolve with engineers rather than assume an implementation.
Behavioural practice
Tell me about a time you clarified an ambiguous workflow problem.
What to coverSuggested preparation: use situation, action, and result to show how you learned what users actually did, checked your interpretation, and narrowed the problem into actionable product work. Keep the example grounded in your real experience.
Tell me about a time domain experts and engineers saw a problem differently.
What to coverSuggested preparation: use situation, action, and result to explain how you surfaced each perspective, resolved or documented the disagreement, and kept the work moving. The role calls for credibility with both accountants and engineers.
Tell me about a time you kept stakeholders aligned while priorities changed.
What to coverSuggested preparation: use situation, action, and result to show how you communicated a roadmap change, made trade-offs clear, and handled outstanding concerns. The posting describes a fast-moving roadmap.
Tell me about a time you used feedback to revise a prototype or product proposal quickly.
What to coverSuggested preparation: use situation, action, and result to explain what the initial version tested, what feedback changed, and what you did next. This reflects the role’s emphasis on rapid demos following discovery.