New opportunity

LLM Model Developer

Accenture · Bengaluru, India

About this role

Accenture is seeking an LLM Model Developer to fine-tune large language models, particularly through instruction fine-tuning and domain adaptation, to improve their relevance and performance in specific contexts. The role is based at its Bengaluru office and is listed as full-time, with an experience range of 5–10 years.

Responsibilities

  • Design, develop and deploy enterprise-grade solutions using Generative and Agentic AI frameworks.
  • Lead AI solution design and delivery to address business challenges, automate processes and integrate intelligent insights into enterprise workflows.
  • Align AI capabilities with business objectives while supporting scalability, responsible use and measurable value.

Requirements

  • At least 5 years of experience with large language models.
  • Strong understanding of Generative AI, Agentic AI, prompt engineering and AI evaluation frameworks.
  • 15 years of full-time education.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Large Language Models (LLMs)Instruction fine-tuningDomain adaptationGenerative AIAgentic AIPrompt engineeringAI evaluation

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Fine-tune LLMs for specific contexts

    The role emphasizes instruction fine-tuning and domain adaptation to improve model relevance and performance.

  • Lead enterprise AI solution delivery

    Design, develop and deploy enterprise-grade solutions using Generative and Agentic AI frameworks to address business challenges.

  • Integrate AI into workflows

    Apply AI to automate processes and bring intelligent insights into enterprise workflows, with measurable impact.

  • Connect evaluation to business value

    The posting calls for prompt engineering and AI evaluation frameworks, alongside alignment with business objectives, scalability, responsible use and tangible value.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Improving domain relevance without losing reliability

    Preparation hypothesis: instruction fine-tuning and domain adaptation may improve performance in a target context while creating trade-offs elsewhere. Prepare to explain how you would compare a baseline and adapted model using relevant evaluation criteria.

  • Balancing agentic automation with responsible use

    Preparation hypothesis: automating enterprise workflows may require limits on what an agent can do independently. Prepare to discuss how you would define those limits and evaluate outcomes before deployment.

  • Turning model performance into measurable value

    Preparation hypothesis: a strong model result may not translate directly into scalable workflow impact. Prepare to explain how you would connect AI evaluation to a business objective and assess the solution after integration.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you design instruction fine-tuning for an LLM serving a specific business context?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would define the target tasks, prepare representative instructions and responses, and separate training from evaluation data. Discuss how you would check whether the tuned model improves relevance without degrading performance on other important tasks.

How would you adapt an LLM to a specialized domain?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss how you would identify domain-specific language and tasks, assess the quality of available data, and evaluate performance in that context. Explain the trade-off between specialization and retaining broader model capabilities.

When would you use prompt engineering rather than fine-tuning?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare the approaches in terms of the change needed, available examples, iteration effort, and evaluation results. Explain how you would test whether a prompt change is sufficient before changing the model.

How would you design an Agentic AI solution to automate part of an enterprise process?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the agent's objective, permitted actions, decision boundaries, and points where a person should review its work. Discuss how you would handle failed steps and assess whether the automation improves the process.

How would you integrate a Generative AI solution into an existing enterprise workflow?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Start with the user's task and where an AI-generated insight or action would fit into that task. Explain how you would design for dependable use, clear handoffs, and a measurable improvement to the workflow.

What evaluation framework would you use for an LLM solution?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Define measures tied to the intended task, use representative test cases, and compare results against a baseline. Include checks for relevance, failure cases, and responsible use rather than relying on a single aggregate score.

How would you investigate an LLM solution whose answers are relevant in testing but unreliable in use?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare failing examples with the evaluation set and trace whether the issue arises from inputs, prompts, model adaptation, or the surrounding workflow. Explain how you would test a proposed fix and watch for regressions.

What trade-offs would you consider when scaling an enterprise-grade AI solution?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss how growing usage could affect response time, cost, and consistency of results. Explain how you would preserve evaluation and responsible-use checks as the solution scales.

How would you build responsible use into an LLM or agentic solution?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Identify potential harms from inaccurate outputs or inappropriate automated actions, then describe boundaries, review points, and ways to detect problems. Relate each safeguard to the solution's intended business use.

How would you show that an AI solution delivers tangible business value?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Translate the business objective into a baseline and a small set of outcome measures, such as task quality or process efficiency where relevant. Explain how you would distinguish a model improvement from an improvement that users experience in the workflow.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you led the design and delivery of an AI solution.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Give the situation and your specific responsibility, then describe the design decisions and actions you led. Close with the result and the evidence used to judge it.

Describe a time you had to align an AI approach with a business objective.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain the original objective, any mismatch between the proposed AI capability and the need, and what you changed. State the outcome in terms of the objective rather than model performance alone.

Tell me about a time an AI solution faced a scalability or delivery constraint.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Set out the constraint and your role, then explain the trade-off you made and how you tested it. Describe the delivery outcome, including any limitation that remained.

Describe a time you addressed a responsible-use concern in an AI project.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Identify the concern and its potential impact, then explain the actions you took and why. Describe the result and what you learned about balancing usefulness with appropriate safeguards.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Instruction fine-tuning and domain adaptation

    Posting: The role fine-tunes LLMs to improve relevance and performance in specific contexts. Suggested revision: explain how instruction examples and domain-specific examples serve different purposes, and what evidence would show improvement.

  • Generative and Agentic AI

    Posting: The role uses both to address business challenges and automate processes. Suggested revision: compare when a direct generated response is sufficient with when an agentic workflow is appropriate, including how to limit unwanted actions.

  • AI evaluation frameworks

    Posting: A strong grasp of AI evaluation frameworks is requested. Suggested revision: outline how you would evaluate answer relevance, task completion and failure cases for a domain-adapted LLM.

  • Enterprise solution trade-offs

    Posting: Solutions should align with business objectives while supporting scalability, responsible use and tangible value. Suggested revision: work through trade-offs among performance, operational scale, risk and measurable business impact.

Skills to revise

  • Prepare instruction examples

    Posting: Instruction fine-tuning and domain adaptation are central to the role. Suggested exercise: draft a small set of domain-specific instructions and desired responses, then check them for clarity, consistency and coverage.

  • Iterate on prompts

    Posting: Prompt engineering is named as a technical skill. Suggested exercise: write and refine prompts for one hypothetical enterprise task, comparing outputs against stated acceptance criteria.

  • Run a structured evaluation

    Posting: The role calls for AI evaluation and measurable impact. Suggested exercise: create a small test set with expected outcomes, record failures and explain which changes you would evaluate next.

  • Present an enterprise AI solution design

    Posting: The role leads design and delivery of GenAI and Agentic AI solutions integrated into enterprise workflows. Suggested exercise: sketch a hypothetical process-automation workflow, showing where the model contributes, how its output is checked and how success would be measured.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Prepare an LLM project walkthrough

    Choose a project you can discuss in depth. Show your role, the business context, model choices, results, and trade-offs; the posting calls for leading enterprise AI solution design and delivery.

  • Explain a fine-tuning approach

    Prepare a short comparison of instruction fine-tuning and domain adaptation, including how you would select data and measure whether relevance improves in a specific context. Both approaches are named in the role description.

  • Practice an enterprise AI design exercise

    Sketch a Generative or Agentic AI solution for a business workflow. Explain where it would automate work or add insights, and how you would connect the design to a business objective.

  • Bring an evaluation example

    Prepare a concise example of prompt engineering and AI evaluation: what you tested, which criteria you used, and how the findings changed the solution. These are stated technical skills.

  • Show delivery judgment

    Be ready to discuss how you would address scalability, responsible use, and measurable value during deployment, distinguishing decisions you made from options you would consider.

  • Organize evidence for stated requirements

    Map your LLM work to dates and responsibilities, and have your education history ready to explain. The posting specifies at least five years of LLM experience and 15 years of full-time education.

  • Draft questions for the employer

    Ask which contexts need fine-tuning or domain adaptation, how the team evaluates AI solutions, and what business outcomes this role would be expected to support. The posting does not specify those details.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 29, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 5 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…