New opportunity

LLM Model Developer

Accenture · Bengaluru, India

About this role

The LLM Model Developer fine-tunes large language models, emphasizing instruction fine-tuning and domain adaptation to improve relevance and performance in specific contexts. The role also designs, develops, and deploys enterprise-grade solutions using Generative and Agentic AI frameworks.

Responsibilities

  • Lead AI-driven solution design and delivery to address complex business challenges.
  • Use Generative and Agentic AI to automate processes and integrate intelligent insights into enterprise workflows.
  • Align AI capabilities with business objectives, with attention to scalability, responsible use, and measurable value.

Requirements

  • 5–10 years of experience; the posting specifies a minimum of 5 years.
  • Large language models are a required skill. A strong grasp of Generative AI, Agentic AI, prompt engineering, and AI evaluation frameworks is also specified.
  • 15 years of full-time education.

This is a full-time position in Bengaluru.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Large Language Models (LLMs)Instruction Fine-TuningDomain AdaptationGenerative AIAgentic AIPrompt EngineeringAI Evaluation

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Instruction fine-tuning and domain adaptation

    The role explicitly focuses on fine-tuning LLMs to improve relevance and performance in specific contexts. Prepare to explain how you would select an adaptation approach and evaluate whether it improves the intended use case.

  • Lead enterprise AI solution delivery

    The posting calls for leading the design, development, and deployment of enterprise-grade Generative and Agentic AI solutions. Prepare to discuss how you would take a solution from a business objective through delivery.

  • Integrate AI into workflows

    The stated responsibilities include automating processes and adding intelligent insights to enterprise workflows. Prepare to explain how an AI capability would fit into an existing workflow and what outcome it would change.

  • Evaluate value, scale, and responsible use

    The posting asks for AI evaluation frameworks and alignment with business objectives, scalability, responsible use, and tangible value. Prepare to connect technical evaluation with business measures and deployment decisions.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Improving domain relevance without weakening broader performance

    Preparation hypothesis: instruction fine-tuning or domain adaptation could improve a targeted task while creating regressions elsewhere. Be ready to explain how you would compare performance before and after adaptation and decide whether the trade-off is acceptable.

  • Balancing agentic automation with control

    Preparation hypothesis: more autonomous workflow steps may increase efficiency but make responsible use and oversight harder. Prepare to describe where you would set boundaries, check outputs, and retain human review.

  • Turning promising AI results into measurable enterprise value

    Preparation hypothesis: a solution may perform well in evaluation yet be difficult to scale or show business impact. Prepare to explain how you would choose measures tied to the workflow and use them to guide deployment decisions.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you approach instruction fine-tuning for a specific business task?

What to coverThe role explicitly emphasizes instruction fine-tuning. Suggested preparation (inferred): explain how you would define the target behavior, prepare and review examples, and compare the resulting model against a baseline for relevance and performance.

How would you adapt an LLM to a specialized domain?

What to coverDomain adaptation is part of the advertised role. Suggested preparation (inferred): discuss how you would identify domain-specific language and failure cases, choose an adaptation approach, and check whether gains generalize beyond the examples used.

When would you use prompt engineering rather than fine-tuning?

What to coverThe posting names prompt engineering and fine-tuning. Suggested preparation (inferred): compare speed of iteration, data needs, maintenance, and the kinds of failures each approach can address.

How would you evaluate whether an LLM solution is fit for its intended use?

What to coverThe posting calls for AI evaluation frameworks and improved model relevance and performance. Suggested preparation (inferred): cover task-specific test cases, human review where appropriate, failure analysis, and criteria tied to the business objective.

How would you investigate a drop in model relevance after adaptation?

What to coverImproving relevance in specific contexts is an explicit aim of the role. Suggested preparation (inferred): describe how you would isolate changes in data, prompts, model behavior, and evaluation cases before deciding on a remedy.

How would you design an Agentic AI solution for a complex business challenge?

What to coverThe role involves applying Agentic AI to business challenges. Suggested preparation (inferred): explain how you would bound the agent's tasks, decide what it may do autonomously, and assess whether an agent adds value over a simpler workflow.

How would you integrate AI-generated insights into an enterprise workflow?

What to coverThe posting explicitly mentions integrating intelligent insights and automating processes. Suggested preparation (inferred): describe where outputs enter the workflow, how people or systems act on them, and how you would handle incorrect or unusable outputs.

What would you consider when taking a GenAI solution from design to enterprise deployment?

What to coverDesigning, developing, and deploying enterprise-grade solutions are stated responsibilities. Suggested preparation (inferred): discuss reliability, operational monitoring, scalability, and the trade-offs between performance and the resources needed to run the solution.

How would responsible use affect the design of an LLM application?

What to coverThe posting explicitly calls for responsible use. Suggested preparation (inferred): identify risks relevant to the proposed use, explain proportionate safeguards and review, and describe how you would test whether those safeguards work.

How would you demonstrate that an AI solution delivers tangible business value?

What to coverThe role calls for alignment with business objectives and measurable impact. Suggested preparation (inferred): explain how you would define a baseline, select outcome measures, and distinguish model-quality improvements from changes that benefit the workflow.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you led the design and delivery of an AI solution.

What to coverLeading AI-driven solution design and delivery is a stated responsibility. Suggested preparation (inferred): use a real situation, explain your decisions and actions, and give the result, including what you personally led.

Describe a time you had to align a technical approach with a business objective.

What to coverThe posting emphasizes aligning AI capabilities with business objectives. Suggested preparation (inferred): describe the situation, how you clarified the objective and handled trade-offs, and what result was observed.

Tell me about a time you introduced an intelligent capability into an existing workflow.

What to coverWorkflow integration and process automation are part of the advertised work. Suggested preparation (inferred): give a real situation, the actions you took to make the capability useful in practice, and the resulting change.

Describe a time you had to address a risk in an AI solution.

What to coverResponsible use is explicitly called out in the posting. Suggested preparation (inferred): explain the situation, how you assessed and addressed the risk, and the result without claiming the risk was eliminated.

Tell me about a time evaluation findings changed your solution.

What to coverThe role names AI evaluation frameworks and measurable value. Suggested preparation (inferred): give a real situation, the finding and action it prompted, and the resulting effect on performance or the intended business outcome.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Instruction fine-tuning and domain adaptation

    Review how instruction examples and domain-specific data change LLM behavior. Exercise: explain how you would choose training examples and check whether a model becomes more relevant to a particular business context. The role description explicitly emphasizes both approaches.

  • Generative and Agentic AI solution design

    Compare direct generation with an agentic approach that takes multiple steps. Exercise: sketch when each would suit a business process and what could go wrong. The posting calls for solutions using Generative and Agentic AI to automate processes and support enterprise workflows.

  • AI evaluation frameworks

    Review how to assess response quality against a defined business objective. Exercise: draft evaluation criteria for relevance, correctness and task completion, then explain how you would interpret weak results. The posting explicitly asks for a strong grasp of AI evaluation frameworks.

  • Scalability, responsible use and value

    Consider the trade-offs involved in deploying an AI solution across an enterprise. Exercise: describe how you would assess scalability, responsible use and measurable business impact for a proposed workflow. These are stated considerations for aligning AI capabilities with business objectives.

Skills to revise

  • Prepare domain-specific instruction examples

    Practice drafting a small set of input–response examples for a hypothetical business context, then identify ambiguous or inconsistent examples you would revise. This is preparation for the role's stated instruction fine-tuning and domain-adaptation work, not a specified employer exercise.

  • Iterate on prompts

    Write a prompt for a business task, test it against several contrasting inputs, and revise it to address observed failures. Prompt engineering is explicitly listed among the professional and technical skills.

  • Run a structured output review

    Create a short test set and scoring rubric, assess sample LLM responses, and summarize recurring errors and next steps. This practices the AI evaluation capability named in the posting.

  • Present an enterprise workflow design

    Sketch a proposed GenAI or Agentic AI workflow, showing where it fits into an existing process and how its impact could be measured. This is a suggested interview exercise based on the stated responsibility to lead solution design and integrate intelligent insights into enterprise workflows.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Prepare an LLM project walkthrough

    The role emphasizes instruction fine-tuning and domain adaptation. Prepare one relevant example covering the objective, data, tuning choices, evaluation, and observed results; if you lack a direct example, use a clearly labeled design exercise.

  • Practice an enterprise solution design

    The posting calls for Generative and Agentic AI in enterprise workflows. Sketch a solution to a business problem, showing where an agent would act, where people would remain involved, and how it would integrate with the workflow.

  • Build an evaluation plan

    Prepare a short plan for assessing model relevance and performance in a specific domain, including a baseline, test cases, failure analysis, and measures tied to the business objective. The posting specifically names AI evaluation frameworks and measurable value.

  • Explain prompt and model choices

    Prepare examples showing when you would use prompt engineering, instruction fine-tuning, or domain adaptation. State the trade-offs and what evidence would lead you to revise the approach.

  • Rehearse a delivery leadership example

    The role involves leading AI solution design and delivery. Prepare a concise account of decisions, stakeholder coordination, scalability and responsible-use considerations, and measured outcomes from a relevant project, if available.

  • Organize evidence for stated qualifications

    Have a clear timeline and supporting details ready for LLM experience and education. The posting specifies LLMs as a must-have skill, at least five years of experience, and 15 years of full-time education.

  • Draft questions for the employer

    Ask which domains and workflows this role would support, how success is measured, and what evaluation, scalability, and responsible-use expectations apply. These are questions to clarify, not details established by the posting.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 29, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 5 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…