New opportunity

Artificial Intelligence Engineer

Transient.AI · Bangalore, India

About this role

Transient.AI is seeking an Artificial Intelligence Engineer to build and deploy production AI and machine learning systems for research automation, document intelligence, investor matching, and workflow orchestration. The on-site role is based in Bangalore, Karnataka, India, with listed compensation of ₹ 10-30 Lacs PA.

Responsibilities

  • Design, build, and deploy models for core products, including NLP and LLM systems for retrieval-augmented generation and structured extraction from unstructured financial documents.
  • Develop model evaluation pipelines and maintain data pipelines, feature stores, and evaluation frameworks that support rapid iteration.
  • Work with product and founding engineers to turn capital markets workflows into scalable AI systems. Own model performance, reliability, and cost from experimentation through production deployment.
  • Meet compliance, auditability, and security standards for regulated financial environments, and collaborate with teammates across New York, Miami, Singapore, and India.

Requirements and preferences:

  • The listing specifies 5–8 years of experience and requires 5+ years building and deploying machine learning or AI systems in production. Strong Python skills and hands-on experience with frameworks such as PyTorch, TensorFlow, Hugging Face, or LangChain are required.
  • A solid grounding in data structures, distributed systems, and MLOps practices—including model serving, monitoring, and versioning—is expected. Experience with LLM fine-tuning, prompt engineering, RAG architectures, or agentic systems is highly valued.
  • Experience at a strong product company or high-growth startup, or a top-tier engineering background such as IIT or equivalent, is preferred. Exposure to fintech, capital markets, or another regulated industry is a plus, not mandatory. Candidates should be comfortable with the ambiguity and ownership of an early-stage environment.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

PythonPyTorchTensorFlowHugging FaceLangChainLarge Language ModelsRetrieval-Augmented GenerationPrompt EngineeringFine-tuningMLOpsDockerKubernetesAWSVector DatabasesAPIsNatural Language ProcessingData PipelinesFeature StoresModel EvaluationModel ServingModel MonitoringModel VersioningDistributed SystemsData StructuresStructured Data ExtractionAgentic Systems

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Build applied LLM systems for core products

    The role designs and deploys AI for research automation, document intelligence, investor matching, and workflow orchestration, including RAG and structured extraction from financial documents. Prepare to explain design choices for retrieval, extraction, and evaluation in a production use case.

  • Own production performance, reliability, and cost

    The posting assigns ownership from experimentation through deployment and expects production AI experience and MLOps practices such as serving, monitoring, and versioning. Prepare an example showing how you measured and managed these competing concerns.

  • Enable rapid, measurable iteration

    The role builds model evaluation pipelines and maintains data pipelines, feature stores, and evaluation frameworks. Prepare to discuss how evaluation results would guide model or data changes rather than relying on demonstrations alone.

  • Translate capital-markets workflows into compliant systems

    The engineer partners with product and founding engineers, meets compliance, auditability, and security standards, and collaborates across four locations. Prepare to describe how you would clarify workflow requirements and make system behavior traceable without assuming prior capital-markets experience is mandatory.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Grounding outputs in difficult documents

    Preparation hypothesis: unstructured financial documents may make retrieval and extraction accuracy hard to balance against coverage. Be ready to explain how you would test source grounding, handle uncertain outputs, and inspect extraction errors; the posting does not specify a particular document format or metric.

  • Balancing iteration speed with production constraints

    Preparation hypothesis: rapid experimentation may compete with reliability and cost ownership. Prepare a concrete approach to baselines, evaluation gates, monitoring, and rollback, explaining which trade-offs would require product input.

  • Defining scope amid limited process

    Preparation hypothesis: early-stage ambiguity and collaboration across locations may complicate decisions about what to automate first. Prepare to explain how you would establish a small, testable workflow scope, document assumptions, and seek alignment with product and founding engineers.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you design a retrieval-augmented generation system for research automation?

What to coverThe posting names RAG and research automation as areas of work. Suggested preparation: explain how you would choose, retrieve, and use source material, then evaluate answer quality, traceability, latency, and cost.

How would you extract structured fields from unstructured financial documents?

What to coverStructured extraction from financial documents is an explicit responsibility. Suggested preparation: discuss parsing and model choices, validation of extracted fields, handling ambiguous or missing information, and how you would measure errors.

How would you build an evaluation pipeline for an NLP or LLM system?

What to coverThe role includes model evaluation pipelines and frameworks that support rapid iteration. Suggested preparation: distinguish offline tests from production signals, explain how you would assemble representative examples, and describe how results would inform a release decision.

When would you use prompting, fine-tuning, or an agentic approach?

What to coverThe posting values experience with prompt engineering, fine-tuning, and agentic systems. Suggested preparation: compare their fit for a defined task using quality, data needs, operational complexity, reliability, and cost.

How would you maintain data pipelines and feature stores for model iteration?

What to coverBuilding and maintaining data pipelines and feature stores is part of the advertised work. Suggested preparation: explain data quality checks, reproducibility, and how you would keep training and serving inputs consistent.

How would you serve, monitor, and version a production model?

What to coverThe posting calls for MLOps practices including model serving, monitoring, and versioning. Suggested preparation: describe a deployment and rollback approach, the signals you would monitor, and how you would link a production result to its model and data versions.

How would you balance performance, reliability, and cost as an AI system scales?

What to coverThe role owns these outcomes from experimentation through deployment and calls for distributed-systems grounding. Suggested preparation: walk through a plausible bottleneck, the measurements you would collect, and the trade-offs among capacity, latency, quality, and cost.

How would you make an AI workflow auditable and secure?

What to coverThe posting explicitly requires compliance, auditability, and security in regulated financial environments. Suggested preparation: discuss access controls, handling of sensitive inputs and outputs, and records that would let a team investigate a model decision without exposing unnecessary data.

How would you evaluate an AI-assisted investor-matching system?

What to coverInvestor matching is listed as a core product area, but the posting does not define its matching criteria. Suggested preparation: state the assumptions you would first confirm with product partners, then discuss candidate ranking, relevant evaluation measures, and checks for misleading matches.

How would you implement a scalable workflow-orchestration component in Python?

What to coverWorkflow orchestration, Python, APIs, and data structures appear in the posting. Suggested preparation: sketch how you would represent workflow state and dependencies, handle failures, and select data structures or framework components without assuming a particular tool is required.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you took ownership of an ambiguous AI problem.

What to coverThe posting describes an early-stage environment with limited process and high ownership. Suggested preparation: use a real situation, the decisions and actions you took to clarify scope, and the resulting outcome.

Describe a time you translated a product workflow into an AI system.

What to coverThe role partners with product and founding engineers on capital markets workflows. Suggested preparation: give a real situation, explain how you worked with stakeholders to define the problem and make trade-offs, and state the result.

Tell me about a production model issue you had to resolve.

What to coverThe posting assigns ownership of model performance and reliability through production deployment. Suggested preparation: describe the situation and observable impact, your troubleshooting and communication, and the result without claiming a particular incident process.

Describe a time you collaborated across locations or time zones.

What to coverThe advertised team spans New York, Miami, Singapore, and India. Suggested preparation: provide a real situation, the actions you took to keep work coordinated, and what changed as a result.

Tell me about a time you balanced rapid iteration with a control or quality concern.

What to coverThe role combines rapid model iteration with compliance, auditability, and security expectations. Suggested preparation: use a real situation, explain the trade-off and your actions, and describe the outcome; experience in a regulated industry is not required by the posting.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • RAG and financial-document extraction

    Revise how retrieval-augmented generation and structured extraction handle unstructured financial documents. Exercise: sketch a document-to-answer flow and identify where retrieval errors, missing evidence, or extraction errors could arise. Both applications are named in the posting.

  • Model evaluation, reliability, and cost

    Revise how to evaluate extraction quality, answer grounding, latency, and operating cost together. Exercise: draft an evaluation matrix with test cases and failure thresholds for a document-intelligence system. The role owns model performance, reliability, and cost through deployment.

  • Production MLOps and distributed systems

    Revise model serving, monitoring, versioning, and distributed-system failure modes. Exercise: draw a production architecture and mark how a model version is released, observed, and rolled back. These foundations are explicitly requested.

  • Regulated-workflow design

    Revise the implications of compliance, auditability, and security for AI outputs. Exercise: trace how an extracted claim could be linked to its source document and model version. This is preparation for the posting’s regulated financial environment; prior capital-markets experience is only a plus.

  • LLM adaptation choices

    Compare when prompt engineering, fine-tuning, RAG, or an agentic approach would suit a workflow. Exercise: justify one choice for a hypothetical research-automation task, including its trade-offs. Experience with these approaches is described as highly valued, not universally required.

Skills to revise

  • Python ML implementation

    Implement a small document-processing model or component in Python using one framework named in the posting, such as PyTorch or Hugging Face. Be ready to explain testing and performance decisions; hands-on Python and modern ML frameworks are required.

  • Retrieval and extraction prototype

    Using sample, non-sensitive financial documents, build a small retrieval flow that returns source passages and extracts a defined set of fields. Inspect incorrect outputs. This practices the posting’s RAG and structured-extraction work.

  • Repeatable evaluation pipeline

    Create a small labelled test set, run predictions against it, and produce a report of extraction errors and unsupported answers. The role explicitly calls for model evaluation pipelines and frameworks supporting rapid iteration.

  • Data-pipeline and feature-store design

    Build a repeatable ingestion and validation step for sample documents, then specify how derived features would be updated and versioned. Building and maintaining data pipelines and feature stores is a stated responsibility.

  • Serving and monitoring drill

    Expose a sample model through an API, log latency and errors, and rehearse switching between two model versions. The posting calls for production deployment and MLOps practices including serving, monitoring, and versioning.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Prepare a production AI project walkthrough

    The role calls for 5+ years building and deploying AI/ML systems. Prepare one example covering the problem, your specific contribution, Python and framework choices, deployment, and measured results; distinguish what you owned from team work.

  • Sketch a financial-document AI design

    As a practice exercise, diagram ingestion, structured extraction, retrieval-augmented generation, and serving for unstructured financial documents. Be ready to explain data structures, scaling choices, and how outputs trace back to source material.

  • Build an evaluation plan

    The posting names model evaluation pipelines and rapid iteration. Prepare a sample test set and metrics for extraction accuracy, retrieval quality, response quality, and failure cases, with a plan for comparing versions.

  • Explain production operations and cost trade-offs

    Prepare an architecture sketch showing data pipelines, a feature store where useful, model serving, monitoring, and versioning. Note how you would investigate reliability or cost regressions after deployment.

  • Prepare a security and auditability discussion

    The role involves regulated financial environments. Outline how you would control access to documents, protect sensitive data, and retain traceable records of model inputs, versions, and outputs; present these as design proposals, not company practices.

  • Plan an ownership example and employer questions

    Prepare an example of resolving an ambiguous product requirement with engineers or product partners. Ask how Transient.AI prioritizes its four named product areas, measures production model success, and coordinates decisions across its distributed team.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 29, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 5 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…