New opportunity

AI Native Software Engineer

Accenture · Bengaluru, India

About this role

Accenture seeks an AI Native Software Engineer in Bengaluru to build and ship production-ready software with AI integrated into the engineering lifecycle. The role focuses on AI-enabled ServiceNow features and maintaining solution quality, compliance and secure engineering practices.

Responsibilities

  • Develop features using Now Assist, Virtual Agent and AI Search with App Engine Studio, Flow Designer and IntegrationHub.
  • Implement agentic patterns for workflow automation and developer assistance. Write prompts and evaluators, and contribute to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) strategies and testing frameworks.
  • Work in agile teams with architects and product owners, participating in sprints and code reviews. Apply Responsible AI principles and improve how software is built and operated.

Requirements

  • At least 5 years of experience; the posting also lists an experience band of 5–10 years. It requires 15 years of full-time education. The embedded ServiceNow AI Developer description is labeled “Entry Level,” despite the stated experience requirement.
  • Strong JavaScript, REST API and ServiceNow platform-development fundamentals; familiarity with App Engine, Flow Designer, IntegrationHub and Scoped Applications.
  • Understanding of LLMs, prompt engineering and evaluation metrics; knowledge of Virtual Agent, AI Search tuning and Now Assist configuration. Exposure to ServiceNow data models, UI policies, Business Rules and client scripts.
  • Awareness of SOAP/REST integration patterns, MID Server, OAuth and SAML; basic understanding of RAG, vector search and orchestration frameworks.
  • Collaboration, communication, problem-solving, attention to detail, adaptability and a continuous-learning mindset.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

ServiceNowNow AssistVirtual AgentAI SearchApp Engine StudioFlow DesignerIntegrationHubJavaScriptREST APIsSOAPScoped ApplicationsLarge Language ModelsPrompt EngineeringAI EvaluationRetrieval-Augmented GenerationVector SearchAI AgentsWorkflow AutomationResponsible AIServiceNow Data ModelsUI PoliciesBusiness RulesClient ScriptsMID ServerOAuthSAMLAgile DevelopmentCode ReviewCommunicationCollaboration

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Deliver ServiceNow AI features

    The role calls for features using Now Assist, Virtual Agent and AI Search, built with App Engine Studio, Flow Designer and IntegrationHub. Prepare to explain how JavaScript, REST APIs and ServiceNow platform components fit into a working feature.

  • Develop and evaluate AI-native workflows

    The posting specifies agentic patterns for workflow automation and developer assistance, plus prompts, evaluators, RAG strategies and testing frameworks. Prepare an example of how you would define and test expected behavior, rather than describing prompts alone.

  • Ship with quality and safeguards

    The project role emphasizes production-ready software, validation, quality and compliance; the responsibilities add Responsible AI and secure engineering. Prepare to discuss how testing and review would support a release.

  • Collaborate through delivery

    The role works in agile pods with architects and product owners and participates in sprints and code reviews. Prepare to explain how technical decisions and review feedback move into an implementable solution.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing useful AI responses with reliable evaluation

    A likely challenge, not a reported employer problem, is improving Virtual Agent or AI Search usefulness without accepting inaccurate outputs. Prepare to discuss representative test cases, evaluation metrics and how findings would guide prompt or retrieval changes.

  • Automating workflows without overreaching

    Agentic automation and integrations can increase capability while making unintended actions or access harder to control. Prepare to explain where you would place validation, authentication and human review when connecting ServiceNow workflows to other systems.

  • Maintaining release pace and assurance

    Sprint delivery may create tension with testing, secure engineering and compliance checks. Prepare to describe how you would prioritize checks and use code review to catch issues before production; the posting does not specify a particular release process.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you structure a ServiceNow feature using JavaScript and a Scoped Application?

What to coverSuggested practice: Explain how you would organize platform logic and account for data models, Business Rules, client scripts and UI policies. Discuss how you would test behavior and avoid unnecessary coupling.

How would you approach configuring Now Assist for an AI-enabled feature?

What to coverSuggested practice: Start with the feature’s intended use and explain how you would validate its responses before release. Address quality, secure engineering and Responsible AI considerations without assuming a particular implementation.

How would you design and troubleshoot a Virtual Agent interaction?

What to coverSuggested practice: Describe the user goal, the conversation path and how you would detect an unhelpful or incorrect response. Explain what evidence you would use to decide whether to revise the interaction.

How would you evaluate changes to AI Search tuning?

What to coverSuggested practice: Describe representative queries and criteria for judging whether results are useful. Discuss the trade-off between improving relevance for known queries and checking that other queries have not degraded.

How would you divide a workflow across App Engine Studio, Flow Designer and IntegrationHub?

What to coverSuggested practice: Walk through a plausible ServiceNow workflow and explain which responsibilities you would place in each named tool. Describe how you would validate the workflow end to end.

How would you design and troubleshoot a ServiceNow integration?

What to coverSuggested practice: Compare when SOAP or REST might be appropriate and explain how you would investigate an authentication or connectivity failure. Include the relevance of MID Server, OAuth or SAML where applicable, without assuming the role uses a specific architecture.

How would you apply an agentic pattern to workflow automation or developer assistance?

What to coverSuggested practice: Define the task, the actions the system may take and the points at which its output needs validation. Discuss trade-offs between automation, reliability and human oversight.

How would you write prompts and evaluators for an LLM-enabled feature?

What to coverSuggested practice: Explain how you would specify the intended behavior, build representative test cases and choose evaluation metrics. Address how you would investigate failures rather than relying on a few convincing examples.

How would you assess whether RAG is useful for a ServiceNow AI feature?

What to coverSuggested practice: Explain retrieval, vector search and generation at a conceptual level, then describe how you would test whether retrieved material improves answers. Discuss possible failure points in retrieval or orchestration; the posting asks for a basic understanding, not a specific framework.

What checks would you use before shipping an AI-enabled ServiceNow change?

What to coverSuggested practice: Outline testing for feature behavior, AI output quality and integration failures. Explain how secure engineering and Responsible AI checks would inform a release decision.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you worked with architects and product owners to resolve a technical disagreement.

What to coverSuggested practice: Use a real situation, the actions you took to clarify priorities and the result. Focus on how you communicated trade-offs and reached a workable decision.

Describe a code review in which you helped improve solution quality.

What to coverSuggested practice: Give the situation, the specific feedback or change you contributed and the result. Explain how you kept the review constructive and verified the concern.

Tell me about a difficult defect you investigated with limited initial information.

What to coverSuggested practice: Describe the situation, how you narrowed down the cause and the result. Highlight the checks that prevented a superficial fix or a missed edge case.

Describe a time changing priorities required you to adjust work during a sprint.

What to coverSuggested practice: State what changed, how you coordinated with others and what resulted. Explain how you managed the trade-off between speed and quality in a client-focused setting.

Tell me about a time you had to learn an unfamiliar capability to deliver work.

What to coverSuggested practice: Give a real situation, the steps you took to learn and validate your approach, and the result. Keep the example focused on curiosity and continuous learning rather than claiming expertise you did not have.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • ServiceNow application fundamentals

    Posting: ServiceNow is the must-have skill, with exposure to data models, UI policies, Business Rules, client scripts and Scoped Applications. Revision exercise: explain which of these you would use for data structure, client behavior and server-side behavior in a sample ServiceNow request workflow.

  • ServiceNow AI feature choices

    Posting: the role develops features with Now Assist, Virtual Agent and AI Search, including AI Search tuning and Now Assist configuration. Revision exercise: compare where each feature would fit in a sample support workflow and what you would check before release.

  • LLM evaluation and Responsible AI

    Posting: the role calls for prompts, evaluators, evaluation metrics, testing frameworks and Responsible AI principles. Revision exercise: define a small set of test questions and explain how you would assess answer quality, unsafe outputs and failures.

  • RAG and agentic workflow concepts

    Posting: basic RAG, vector search and orchestration knowledge supports work on RAG strategies and agentic patterns. Revision exercise: draw a retrieval-to-answer flow and an automated workflow, marking where evaluation and human checks could occur; the checks are a preparation suggestion, not a stated design requirement.

  • Integration and authentication patterns

    Posting: REST API fundamentals and awareness of SOAP/REST, MID Server, OAuth and SAML are specified. Revision exercise: explain the purpose of each in a hypothetical ServiceNow integration and identify where authentication and error handling matter.

Skills to revise

  • Build a scoped ServiceNow feature

    Posting: JavaScript, platform development, App Engine Studio and Scoped Applications are relevant. Practice suggestion: implement or sketch a small scoped request feature with a Business Rule, client script and UI policy, then explain why each belongs there.

  • Automate a workflow and integration

    Posting: Flow Designer and IntegrationHub are named development tools. Practice suggestion: build or outline a flow triggered by a record change that calls a REST endpoint; show inputs, authentication handling, failure handling and the resulting record update.

  • Configure and test an AI-enabled interaction

    Posting: Now Assist configuration, Virtual Agent and AI Search tuning are named. Practice suggestion: configure one interaction if you have platform access, or write its configuration plan; test several user phrasings and document when search results or responses miss the intent.

  • Write prompts and evaluators

    Posting: authoring prompts and evaluators and contributing to RAG testing frameworks are responsibilities. Practice suggestion: draft a prompt for a retrieved-answer scenario, create a small test set with expected behavior, and record how you would score groundedness and failures.

  • Review for quality and security

    Posting: the role participates in code reviews and applies secure engineering and Responsible AI practices. Practice suggestion: review a sample JavaScript or workflow change for validation, access to data, error handling and AI-output risks; explain your findings as you would to an architect or product owner.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Prepare a ServiceNow project walkthrough

    Choose a real project, if available, and outline the problem, your contribution, JavaScript and platform-development choices, testing, and production outcome. The posting calls for production-ready software and strong ServiceNow fundamentals.

  • Sketch an AI-enabled ServiceNow feature

    Prepare a hypothetical design for a Now Assist, Virtual Agent, or AI Search feature. Show how App Engine Studio, Flow Designer, IntegrationHub, or Scoped Applications might fit, and label design choices as proposals rather than job requirements.

  • Trace an integration end to end

    Draw a sample ServiceNow-to-external-system flow showing REST or SOAP calls, authentication, error handling, and where a MID Server might be relevant. Be ready to explain relevant data models, Business Rules, UI policies, or client scripts.

  • Build a prompt and evaluation example

    Draft a prompt, an evaluator, and a small set of test cases for an AI-assisted workflow. Explain the metrics you would use and, as a design exercise, where RAG, vector search, or an agentic pattern could help.

  • Document quality and collaboration decisions

    Prepare an example or proposed approach covering secure engineering, Responsible AI risks, code review feedback, and sprint collaboration with architects and product owners. Distinguish work you have done from hypothetical choices.

  • Prepare focused questions for Accenture

    Ask which ServiceNow AI features are in scope, how solution quality and AI evaluation are assessed, and how the team applies Responsible AI. Clarify the posting’s 5–10-year Team Lead/Consultant band versus the embedded “Entry Level” label.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 4 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…