New opportunity

AI Native Software Engineer

Accenture · Bengaluru, India

About this role

Accenture is hiring an AI Native Software Engineer in Bengaluru to build and ship production-ready software using AI throughout the engineering lifecycle. The role focuses on AI-enabled ServiceNow features and maintaining quality, compliance and secure engineering practices.

Responsibilities

  • Develop features using Now Assist, Virtual Agent and AI Search, alongside App Engine Studio, Flow Designer and IntegrationHub.
  • Implement agentic patterns for workflow automation and developer assistance. Write prompts and evaluators, contribute to RAG strategies and testing frameworks, and help validate solutions.
  • Work with architects and product owners in agile pods, participating in sprints and code reviews. Apply Responsible AI principles and improve how software is built and operated.

Requirements

  • The listing states 2–5 years of experience and separately specifies a minimum of 3 years. It requires 15 years of full-time education. ServiceNow is the stated must-have skill.
  • Bring strong JavaScript, REST API and ServiceNow platform-development fundamentals; familiarity with ServiceNow App Engine, Flow Designer, IntegrationHub and Scoped Applications; and understanding of LLMs, prompt engineering and evaluation metrics.
  • Know Virtual Agent, AI Search tuning and Now Assist configuration. Have exposure to ServiceNow data models, UI policies, Business Rules and client scripts; awareness of SOAP/REST integrations, MID Server, OAuth and SAML; and a basic understanding of RAG, vector search and orchestration frameworks.
  • Demonstrate curiosity, continuous learning, collaboration, communication, problem-solving, attention to detail and adaptability in client-focused environments.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

ServiceNowNow AssistVirtual AgentAI SearchApp Engine StudioFlow DesignerIntegrationHubScoped ApplicationsJavaScriptREST APIsSOAPLLMsPrompt EngineeringAI EvaluationRAGVector SearchAgentic AIWorkflow AutomationResponsible AISecure EngineeringServiceNow Data ModelsUI PoliciesBusiness RulesClient ScriptsMID ServerOAuthSAMLAgileCommunicationCollaboration

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Ship AI-enabled ServiceNow features

    The role calls for developing Now Assist, Virtual Agent and AI Search features using App Engine Studio, Flow Designer and IntegrationHub. Prepare to explain how you would take a feature from configuration through validation.

  • Develop and evaluate AI-native workflows

    The posting names agentic workflow automation, developer assistance, prompts, evaluators, RAG strategies and testing frameworks. Focus preparation on how you would assess whether an AI-enabled workflow works as intended.

  • Apply ServiceNow development fundamentals

    ServiceNow is the must-have skill; the listing also emphasizes JavaScript, REST APIs, platform development and familiarity with scoped applications and integrations. Be ready to explain technical choices within the platform.

  • Deliver production-ready work collaboratively

    The role involves agile pods, architects, product owners, sprints and code reviews, while maintaining quality, compliance, Responsible AI and secure engineering practices. Prepare examples that show how those considerations shape implementation.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing AI usefulness with dependable results

    A likely preparation challenge is deciding when a prompt, AI Search tuning or RAG approach is good enough for a production feature. Prepare to discuss evaluation criteria, testing and how you would respond to weak results; this is an inference from the stated AI and validation duties, not a reported employer problem.

  • Choosing platform configuration versus custom logic

    Using Flow Designer, App Engine and IntegrationHub alongside JavaScript, Business Rules and integrations may require trade-offs between speed, maintainability and control. Prepare to explain when you would use platform capabilities and when additional code or integration work would be warranted.

  • Moving quickly without bypassing safeguards

    Agentic automation and agile delivery may create tension with code review, secure engineering and Responsible AI. Prepare to describe how you would review and validate an automated workflow before release; the tension is a preparation hypothesis, not a stated Accenture issue.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you design a ServiceNow feature using Now Assist and Virtual Agent?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain what each capability would contribute and how you would decide where AI assistance is useful. Discuss how you would validate the resulting interaction before release.

How would you tune AI Search when results are not useful?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe how you would identify weak results, make a targeted change and compare results before and after. Include a way to check that the change does not make other searches worse.

How would you structure a feature in App Engine Studio and a Scoped Application?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how the ServiceNow data model and application scope would shape the design. Discuss how you would keep the feature maintainable as it changes.

When would you use Flow Designer and IntegrationHub for workflow automation?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Walk through how you would divide work between a flow and an integration. Address failure handling and how you would test the workflow.

How would you choose between a UI policy, client script and Business Rule?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare where each runs and the kind of behaviour it should control. Use JavaScript and ServiceNow platform fundamentals to explain how you would avoid conflicting or unreliable logic.

How would you approach an external integration with ServiceNow?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare SOAP and REST where relevant, and explain when a MID Server might matter. Discuss how you would investigate authentication needs, including the listed OAuth and SAML mechanisms, without treating them as interchangeable.

How would you write and evaluate a prompt for an AI-enabled feature?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the task, expected output and examples you would use to test the prompt. Explain which evaluation metrics would reveal whether a revision improved it.

What would you consider when contributing to a RAG strategy?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain the basic roles of retrieval, vector search and generation, then describe how you would test whether retrieved material supports an answer. Keep the discussion at the basic-understanding level stated in the posting.

How would you assess an agentic pattern for workflow automation or developer assistance?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Identify the steps the system would take and where checks or human review would be appropriate. Discuss the trade-off between useful automation and actions that are difficult to verify or control.

How would you validate an AI-enabled ServiceNow feature for production?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Connect testing frameworks and evaluators to the posting’s emphasis on quality, compliance, Responsible AI and secure engineering. Explain what you would check before release and how you would respond to a failed check.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about collaborating with different stakeholders to deliver a feature.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use a real situation to explain the goal, your actions and the result. Highlight how you communicated decisions or resolved differing priorities, reflecting the role’s collaboration with architects and product owners.

Describe a time a code review changed your approach.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Give the situation, the feedback and what you did in response, followed by the result. Focus on how the review affected quality or maintainability rather than claiming an ideal outcome.

Tell me about a difficult software problem where attention to detail mattered.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the situation, how you investigated it and what your actions revealed. State the actual result and how you checked the fix.

Describe a time you adapted to changing needs in a client-focused project.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain the situation, what changed, how you adjusted your work or communication and the result. Choose an example that shows adaptability without inventing a client outcome.

Tell me about learning a new technical concept and applying it.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use a real situation to show what you needed to learn, the actions you took and the result. Relate the example to the posting’s emphasis on curiosity and continuous learning.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • ServiceNow application behavior

    Posting: ServiceNow is the must-have skill; the role calls for platform development and exposure to data models, UI policies, Business Rules, client scripts, and Scoped Applications. Revision exercise: sketch how a record change moves through these components, explaining which behavior belongs on the client and which belongs on the server.

  • ServiceNow AI capabilities

    Posting: the role develops features with Now Assist, Virtual Agent, and AI Search, and calls for configuration and search-tuning knowledge. Revision exercise: compare when each capability fits a sample support request and identify what you would check to judge the result.

  • LLM evaluation and retrieval

    Posting: prompt engineering, evaluation metrics, evaluators, RAG, and vector search are named. Revision exercise: outline a retrieval-to-answer sequence, then define test cases and metrics for answer relevance and unsupported claims.

  • Agentic workflows and safeguards

    Posting: implement agentic patterns for workflow automation and developer assistance while applying Responsible AI and secure engineering practices. Revision exercise: diagram a proposed agent workflow and mark where it should validate outputs, limit actions, and require review. The diagram is a preparation suggestion, not a specified employer design.

  • Integration and authentication concepts

    Posting: REST APIs are a strong fundamental; SOAP/REST integration patterns, MID Server, OAuth, and SAML are listed as awareness areas. Revision exercise: explain the purpose of each in a ServiceNow integration scenario and distinguish API access from user authentication.

Skills to revise

  • Build a scoped ServiceNow feature

    Posting: platform development, JavaScript, App Engine Studio, Scoped Applications, Business Rules, and client scripts are relevant. Suggested practice: in a practice instance, create a small scoped record workflow with one server-side rule and one client-side behavior; test both and explain the choice of each.

  • Automate and integrate a flow

    Posting: Flow Designer, IntegrationHub, and REST APIs are named. Suggested practice: configure a simple record-triggered flow with a REST integration step in a practice environment, then test a successful response and a failed response. This is a revision exercise, not a stated project.

  • Configure and check an AI-enabled interaction

    Posting: Now Assist, Virtual Agent, and AI Search feature work is central. Suggested practice: if a suitable practice instance is available, configure a small interaction and test whether its responses and search results address several sample requests; otherwise, write out the configuration and test plan.

  • Write prompts and evaluators

    Posting: authoring prompts and evaluators and contributing to testing frameworks are explicit responsibilities. Suggested practice: write a prompt for a ServiceNow support scenario, create a short set of expected and problematic outputs, and score them against stated criteria; include a check for unsupported answers.

  • Review changes with an agile pod

    Posting: the engineer participates in sprints and code reviews with architects and product owners. Suggested practice: review a small example change, note a functional test, a security concern, and an open requirement question, then practice explaining those findings concisely.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map your evidence to the posting

    Prepare a one-page reference to relevant ServiceNow, JavaScript and REST API work, plus dates of experience and full-time education. The page lists 2–5 years of experience, separately states a three-year minimum, and specifies 15 years of full-time education; do not assume how Accenture reconciles those statements.

  • Build a ServiceNow project walkthrough

    If you have a relevant project, outline the problem, your contribution, implementation choices, testing and result. Highlight any work with Scoped Applications, data models, Business Rules, client scripts, UI policies or integrations without claiming tools you did not use.

  • Practice an AI-enabled feature design

    As interview preparation, sketch how you would implement and validate a ServiceNow feature using Now Assist, Virtual Agent or AI Search. Show where App Engine Studio, Flow Designer and IntegrationHub could fit, and label assumptions rather than presenting the design as an Accenture project.

  • Prepare an AI evaluation example

    Draft a sample prompt, a small test set and evaluation criteria for a workflow-assistance use case. Be ready to discuss failure cases and, at a basic level, when RAG, vector search or an agentic pattern might help.

  • Review integration and security decisions

    Prepare a short explanation of a REST or SOAP integration design, including what you would check about MID Server use and OAuth or SAML. Note how you would address secure engineering and Responsible AI concerns in the proposed design.

  • Rehearse a collaboration example

    Prepare one concise account of a sprint, code review or design discussion with other roles, if available. Identify your contribution, a problem you resolved and how you communicated a trade-off; the posting emphasizes work with architects and product owners.

  • Write questions for the employer

    Ask which ServiceNow AI features the team is currently developing, how prompts and evaluators are tested, and what responsibilities this role has in code reviews and production validation. Ask how the stated 2–5-year range relates to the separate three-year minimum.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 4 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…