New opportunity

AI Native Software Engineer

Accenture · Bengaluru, India

About this role

Accenture is hiring an AI Native Software Engineer in Bengaluru to build and ship production-ready software with AI integrated into the engineering lifecycle. The role focuses on developing AI-enabled ServiceNow features and validating solutions while maintaining quality, compliance and secure engineering practices.

Responsibilities

  • Develop features using ServiceNow Now Assist, Virtual Agent and AI Search, alongside App Engine Studio, Flow Designer and IntegrationHub.
  • Implement agentic patterns for workflow automation and developer assistance. Write prompts and evaluators, and contribute to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) strategies and testing frameworks.
  • Work with architects and product owners in agile pods, participating in sprints and code reviews. Apply Responsible AI principles and improve how software is built and operated.

Requirements

  • At least 5 years of experience and 15 years of full-time education. ServiceNow is listed as a must-have skill.
  • Strong fundamentals in JavaScript, REST APIs and ServiceNow platform development; familiarity with App Engine, Flow Designer, IntegrationHub and Scoped Applications.
  • Understanding of large language models, prompt engineering and evaluation metrics; knowledge of Virtual Agent, AI Search tuning and Now Assist configuration.
  • Exposure to ServiceNow data models, UI policies, Business Rules and client scripts; awareness of SOAP/REST integration patterns, MID Server and OAuth/SAML authentication; basic understanding of RAG, vector search and orchestration frameworks.
  • Collaboration, communication, problem-solving, attention to detail, adaptability and a continuous-learning mindset.

The posting identifies this as a full-time Team Lead/Consultant position and labels its detailed ServiceNow AI Developer description 'Entry Level'; it separately states a minimum five-year experience requirement.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

ServiceNowNow AssistVirtual AgentAI SearchApp Engine StudioFlow DesignerIntegrationHubScoped ApplicationsJavaScriptREST APIsSOAPMID ServerOAuthSAMLLarge Language ModelsPrompt EngineeringAI EvaluationRetrieval-Augmented GenerationVector SearchAgentic AIWorkflow AutomationServiceNow Business RulesServiceNow UI PoliciesClient ScriptsAgile DevelopmentResponsible AISecure Engineering

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Ship AI-enabled ServiceNow features

    The role explicitly calls for developing Now Assist, Virtual Agent and AI Search features using App Engine Studio, Flow Designer and IntegrationHub, with production-ready delivery as the goal.

  • Validate AI behavior

    The posting names prompts, evaluators, RAG strategies and testing frameworks, alongside LLM evaluation metrics and AI Search tuning. Validation is part of the engineering work, not an afterthought.

  • Build on sound platform and integration fundamentals

    ServiceNow is the must-have skill. The posting also emphasizes JavaScript, REST APIs and platform development, with exposure to data models, Business Rules, client scripts and integration and authentication patterns.

  • Deliver collaboratively and responsibly

    The role involves agile pods, architects, product owners, sprints and code reviews, while applying Responsible AI principles and secure engineering practices.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balance automation with dependable outcomes

    Preparation hypothesis: agentic workflow automation may increase speed but make incorrect actions harder to catch. Prepare to explain how prompts, evaluators, tests and appropriate workflow controls could support reliable behavior without removing useful automation.

  • Keep AI features useful within platform constraints

    Preparation hypothesis: tuning AI Search or RAG for better answers may compete with response time, maintainability and ServiceNow integration needs. Prepare a concrete approach to measuring answer quality, diagnosing retrieval failures and deciding when a simpler platform feature is sufficient.

  • Coordinate changes across an integrated workflow

    Preparation hypothesis: an AI-enabled feature may span ServiceNow configuration, scripts, flows and external APIs, making changes difficult to review and secure. Prepare to describe how you would clarify interfaces with architects and product owners, then validate behavior in sprints and code reviews.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

Suggested practice: How would you decide between a Business Rule, client script and UI policy for a ServiceNow feature?

What to coverThe posting names these mechanisms alongside ServiceNow data models and JavaScript. Explain where each runs, how it affects the user experience or stored data, and how you would test the choice.

Suggested practice: How would you structure an AI-enabled feature in App Engine Studio and a Scoped Application?

What to coverThe posting calls for developing ServiceNow AI features and lists both App Engine and Scoped Applications. As preparation, discuss application boundaries, data access and how you would keep the feature maintainable.

Suggested practice: When would you use Flow Designer and IntegrationHub for workflow automation?

What to coverBoth tools are named in the responsibilities. As preparation, walk through a workflow with an external step, including failure handling and when custom development might be preferable.

Suggested practice: How would you configure and validate a Now Assist or Virtual Agent feature?

What to coverThe posting names Now Assist configuration and Virtual Agent knowledge. Discuss the intended user task, how you would check response quality, and when the feature should hand off rather than continue automatically.

Suggested practice: How would you tune and evaluate AI Search?

What to coverAI Search tuning is explicitly listed. As preparation, explain how you would assess result relevance for representative queries, investigate poor results and check for unintended information exposure.

Suggested practice: How would you design a secure ServiceNow integration?

What to coverThe posting lists REST APIs, SOAP/REST patterns, MID Server and OAuth/SAML awareness. Compare when those components are relevant, and explain how you would handle authentication, errors and sensitive data without assuming a particular external system.

Suggested practice: How would you write and evaluate prompts for an AI-enabled feature?

What to coverAuthoring prompts and evaluators is a stated responsibility, and the posting calls for LLM and evaluation-metric understanding. As preparation, describe representative test cases, measurable quality criteria and how you would investigate a regression.

Suggested practice: What trade-offs would you consider in a RAG approach?

What to coverThe posting asks for contributions to RAG strategies and basic understanding of vector search and orchestration frameworks. Explain retrieval relevance, grounding and response quality, including how you would test failures such as missing or misleading retrieved content.

Suggested practice: How would you control an agentic workflow used for automation or developer assistance?

What to coverImplementing agentic patterns for those two purposes is a stated duty. As preparation, discuss tool access, checks before consequential actions, failure recovery and how to evaluate whether the pattern adds value over a simpler workflow.

Suggested practice: How would you validate an AI feature for production use?

What to coverThe role description emphasizes production-ready software, testing frameworks, quality, compliance, Responsible AI and secure engineering. As preparation, outline functional and AI-output tests, review points and how you would handle a failing release criterion.

Behavioural practice

Suggested practice: Tell me about collaborating across engineering and product roles on an ambiguous task.

What to coverThe posting describes agile pods working with architects and product owners. Give a real situation, your actions to clarify requirements or trade-offs, and the result.

Suggested practice: Describe a code review that changed your implementation or improved a colleague’s work.

What to coverCode reviews are a stated part of the role. Explain the situation, how you communicated and acted on feedback, and the resulting change in quality or maintainability.

Suggested practice: Tell me about diagnosing a difficult software-quality problem.

What to coverThe posting emphasizes problem-solving, attention to detail and validating solutions. Use a real situation, the steps you took to isolate and resolve it, and the result.

Suggested practice: Describe a time you raised a security, compliance or responsible-AI concern.

What to coverSecure engineering and Responsible AI are explicit responsibilities. Explain the situation, what you did to assess or communicate the concern, and the outcome without claiming a particular company policy.

Suggested practice: Tell me about adapting quickly to an unfamiliar technology or changing client need.

What to coverThe posting calls for adaptability, curiosity and continuous learning in a client-focused environment. Describe the situation, how you learned or adjusted your approach, and the result.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • ServiceNow platform design

    The posting requires ServiceNow and names Scoped Applications and data models. Revise by diagramming how a scoped AI-enabled feature would store data and interact with platform workflows; explain the design boundaries you would check.

  • LLMs, prompts and evaluation

    The posting calls for understanding LLMs, prompt engineering and evaluation metrics. Revise by comparing two prompt approaches for a support workflow and defining measurable checks for answer quality and failure cases.

  • RAG and agentic workflows

    The posting asks for basic RAG and vector-search understanding and agentic patterns for automation. Revise by sketching retrieval, response generation and workflow-action steps, including where an evaluator or human check should intervene.

  • Integration and security concepts

    The posting names SOAP/REST, MID Server, OAuth, SAML, Responsible AI and secure engineering. Revise by explaining when each integration or authentication concept is relevant and identifying data-access risks in an AI-enabled workflow.

Skills to revise

  • Build a ServiceNow workflow feature

    The posting names App Engine Studio, Flow Designer and IntegrationHub. As a preparation exercise, build a small scoped workflow in a practice environment, or outline its configuration if access is unavailable, and explain how you would validate its behavior.

  • Write and review platform scripts

    JavaScript is a stated fundamental; the posting also mentions Business Rules, UI policies and client scripts. Practice a small validation scenario, deciding what belongs in each mechanism, then review the script for correctness and maintainability.

  • Configure and test AI-enabled experiences

    The role develops features with Now Assist, Virtual Agent and AI Search, and calls for configuration and search-tuning knowledge. Practice tracing a sample user request through those components; where access permits, adjust a configuration and test the result.

  • Author prompts and evaluators

    The posting explicitly calls for prompts, evaluators and testing frameworks. Draft a prompt for a ServiceNow workflow, create a small test set with expected outcomes, and score responses against stated quality and safety criteria.

  • Review an integration design

    REST APIs are a stated fundamental, with awareness of SOAP/REST patterns, MID Server and OAuth/SAML requested. As a preparation exercise, outline an external-system integration, including authentication, error handling and a code-review checklist; do not assume a particular integration is used in this role.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Prepare a ServiceNow project walkthrough

    The posting requires ServiceNow development and JavaScript fundamentals. Prepare a walkthrough of work you can substantiate, covering the data model, Scoped Applications, Business Rules, client scripts or UI policies, your decisions, and how you validated the result.

  • Map out an AI-enabled feature

    The role names Now Assist, Virtual Agent, AI Search, App Engine Studio, Flow Designer and IntegrationHub. As a preparation exercise, sketch a feature using relevant tools and explain its workflow, configuration choices and failure handling; label it hypothetical if it is not past work.

  • Draft an AI evaluation example

    The posting calls for prompts, evaluators, RAG strategies and testing frameworks. Prepare a sample prompt, a small set of test cases, evaluation criteria and an explanation of when retrieval or vector search would help.

  • Rehearse an integration design

    The posting mentions REST and SOAP patterns, MID Server, OAuth and SAML. Prepare a simple ServiceNow integration diagram and be ready to explain authentication, data flow, error handling and testing without implying every component is always needed.

  • Document quality and safety decisions

    The role emphasizes production readiness, Responsible AI, compliance and secure engineering. Prepare specific examples or a hypothetical review checklist covering access controls, sensitive data, unreliable AI output, monitoring and code review.

  • Prepare collaboration examples and role questions

    The posting describes agile pods with architects and product owners. Prepare a concise example of a design trade-off or code-review discussion, then ask which ServiceNow AI capabilities are in scope and how the 'Entry Level' description relates to the stated 5–10 years of experience and Team Lead/Consultant label.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 4 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…