New opportunity

AI Lead

iTCart Private Limited · Bengaluru, India

About this role

The AI Lead will drive AI strategy, architecture and execution across iTCart’s enterprise platforms and products in Bengaluru, India. Reporting to the Head of AI / AI Architect, the role combines production-grade AI solution delivery with leadership of AI teams.

Responsibilities

  • Own the end-to-end AI strategy, roadmap and execution; translate business challenges into scalable AI architectures and support enterprise AI adoption.
  • Lead development and deployment of AI/ML and generative AI solutions. Oversee model training, validation, deployment and optimization, including work on LLMs, RAG pipelines, AI agents and predictive analytics.
  • Establish MLOps pipelines and AI lifecycle processes. Monitor model performance, reliability, cost and drift, and support scalable deployment through APIs, microservices and cloud systems.
  • Mentor AI engineers, ML engineers and data scientists; work with product, engineering and business stakeholders to align enterprise AI initiatives.
  • Implement responsible AI practices and governance frameworks, ensure ethical and compliant AI use, and establish coding standards and AI best practices.

Qualifications

  • 10–12 years of overall experience, including a minimum of 2+ years in an AI Lead or equivalent leadership role and 7+ years in AI/ML, machine learning or data science. Hands-on experience implementing enterprise-scale AI platforms is required.
  • Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, Data Science or a related field. Strong AI solution architecture, problem-solving, communication, stakeholder management and team leadership skills are expected.
  • Preferred: AI/ML, cloud or data certifications.

This is a full-time position.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

AI strategyAI architectureMachine LearningGenerative AILarge Language ModelsRAGAI agentsPredictive analyticsMLOpsModel trainingModel validationModel deploymentModel optimizationModel monitoringAPIsMicroservicesCloud-native systemsResponsible AIAI governanceTeam leadershipStakeholder management

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • AI strategy and architecture

    The role owns the AI roadmap and translates business challenges into scalable architectures for enterprise platforms and products. Prepare to explain how you would connect use cases, architecture decisions and execution.

  • Production AI solution delivery

    The role leads development and deployment of AI/ML and GenAI solutions, including LLMs, RAG pipelines, AI agents and predictive analytics. Prepare to discuss decisions across training, validation, deployment and optimization.

  • MLOps and operational performance

    The role establishes AI lifecycle processes and monitors performance, reliability, cost and drift, with deployment through APIs, microservices and cloud systems. Prepare a concrete production-system example covering monitoring and operational decisions.

  • Team and stakeholder leadership

    The role mentors AI engineers, ML engineers and data scientists while aligning product, engineering and business stakeholders. Prepare to explain how you set technical direction and resolve cross-functional priorities.

  • Responsible AI and quality

    The role implements governance, supports ethical and compliant AI use, and establishes coding standards and best practices. Prepare to describe how these controls fit into delivery rather than being added after deployment.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balancing ambition with a deliverable roadmap

    A likely challenge is narrowing broad enterprise AI opportunities into architectures and milestones that can be executed. Prepare a framework for choosing use cases and explaining trade-offs to business and engineering stakeholders; this is a preparation hypothesis, not a stated company problem.

  • Managing production trade-offs

    A likely challenge is balancing model quality and new GenAI capabilities against reliability, latency and cost while monitoring drift. Prepare an example showing how you chose measures, deployment controls and optimization steps; the posting does not specify a particular production issue.

  • Scaling delivery without weakening controls

    Leading multiple AI disciplines while establishing governance and coding standards may create tension between delivery speed and review rigor. Prepare to explain how you would assign ownership and build proportionate checks into the AI lifecycle; this is an inference from the role's combined responsibilities.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you turn a complex business problem into an enterprise AI roadmap?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Explain how you would define the outcome, assess data and operational constraints, and prioritize opportunities by value and feasibility. Describe how architecture choices and delivery milestones would support adoption across products or platforms.

What would you consider when designing a scalable AI architecture?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss how components for data, models, serving, and monitoring fit together in a production-grade system. Address trade-offs among scalability, reliability, integration effort, and cost.

How would you train and validate a predictive model before deployment?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Cover baseline selection, data quality, appropriate validation splits, and metrics tied to the business problem. Explain how you would check for leakage and decide whether the model is ready for production.

When would you use an LLM with a RAG pipeline rather than another AI approach?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Compare the need for grounded answers with the capabilities and limitations of the available approaches. Explain how retrieval quality, answer quality, latency, and cost would influence the design.

How would you diagnose poor answers from a RAG pipeline?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Separate retrieval failures from generation failures using relevant evaluation examples. Discuss possible adjustments to document preparation, retrieval, or answer generation and how you would test whether they helped.

How would you decide whether an AI agent is appropriate for a workflow?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Contrast agent-based execution with a simpler, more predictable workflow. Describe how you would evaluate task success, reliability, and the controls needed before deployment.

What AI lifecycle processes would you establish through MLOps?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Walk through reproducible training, validation, deployment, and subsequent optimization. Explain how lifecycle controls help a team manage changes to production models.

How would you monitor and troubleshoot a production AI system?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Address model performance, drift, reliability, and cost, as specified in the role. Explain how you would distinguish a model issue from a serving or data issue and choose a response.

How would you deploy an AI capability through APIs, microservices, and cloud systems?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe service boundaries and how the AI capability would integrate with an enterprise product. Discuss trade-offs involving scaling, latency, reliability, and operating cost.

How would you build responsible AI and quality controls into delivery?

What to coverSuggested preparation: Discuss how governance, ethical and compliant use, coding standards, and review points could fit into the AI lifecycle. Explain how you would evaluate a proposed control against delivery needs without treating governance as a final checklist.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about a time you helped an AI team member grow.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Use a real situation, your mentoring actions, and the result. Explain how you adapted your support while maintaining delivery and quality expectations.

Describe a time product, engineering, and business stakeholders disagreed on an AI initiative.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Give the situation, how you clarified priorities and trade-offs, and the result. Focus on your contribution to cross-functional alignment rather than claiming agreement was automatic.

Tell me about a time you prioritized competing AI opportunities.

What to coverSuggested preparation: State the business context, the criteria you used to shape a roadmap, and what happened. Explain how you communicated decisions and handled uncertainty.

Describe a production AI problem you led a team through.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Present the situation, your actions to diagnose and coordinate a response, and the outcome. Include what you learned about performance, reliability, drift, or cost if relevant to your actual example.

Tell me about a time you raised an AI quality or governance concern.

What to coverSuggested preparation: Describe the situation, how you communicated the concern and proposed a practical response, and the result. Use a real example rather than assuming a particular policy or process at iTCart.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Enterprise AI strategy and architecture

    The role owns the AI roadmap and translates business challenges into scalable architectures. Revision exercise: sketch how you would turn one hypothetical enterprise problem into a prioritized roadmap and production architecture; treat the scenario as preparation, not a stated iTCart project.

  • AI/ML model lifecycle

    The posting covers model training, validation, deployment, optimization, and predictive analytics. Revision exercise: outline the decisions and evidence needed at each stage for a hypothetical predictive model.

  • LLMs, RAG, and AI agents

    The role explicitly drives implementation of all three. Revision exercise: compare when a direct LLM response, a RAG pipeline, or an agent would fit a hypothetical business task, including how you would validate the result.

  • MLOps and production architecture

    The role establishes AI lifecycle processes and supports deployment through APIs, microservices, and cloud systems. Revision exercise: draw a deployment lifecycle showing release, monitoring, and rollback decisions.

  • Responsible AI and governance

    The posting calls for responsible AI practices, ethical and compliant use, coding standards, and governance frameworks. Revision exercise: draft a short review checklist for an AI release, with an owner and evidence for each check.

  • Technical leadership and alignment

    The role mentors AI teams and aligns product, engineering, and business stakeholders. Revision exercise: prepare a concise account of how you would resolve conflicting priorities while maintaining technical standards.

Skills to revise

  • Present an AI solution design

    Practice presenting a hypothetical enterprise AI architecture from business objective to deployment, explaining scaling and trade-offs. This exercises the solution architecture and stakeholder communication expected of the AI Lead; the example is a preparation suggestion.

  • Review a model validation plan

    Create a sample validation plan that states success criteria, checks failure cases, and identifies a deployment decision. This rehearses the posted responsibility to oversee model validation and optimization.

  • Map a RAG pipeline

    Sketch a hypothetical RAG flow from information retrieval to generated answer, then specify tests for retrieval quality and answer quality. This is suggested practice for the posting’s explicit RAG delivery responsibility.

  • Design a production monitoring response

    Draft a sample monitoring dashboard specification and response steps for performance, reliability, cost, and drift. These are the four monitoring concerns named in the posting.

  • Run a technical review conversation

    Rehearse giving an engineer actionable feedback on a hypothetical AI design while explaining a decision to product and business stakeholders. This prepares for the stated mentoring and cross-functional alignment responsibilities.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Map the stated requirements to evidence

    Prepare a one-page reference to relevant work, if applicable, covering enterprise-scale AI platforms, AI/ML delivery, leadership, education and any preferred certifications. The posting specifies 10–12 years overall, 7+ years in AI/ML and 2+ years in an AI Lead or equivalent role.

  • Build a production AI project walkthrough

    Choose a project you can discuss accurately. Prepare a diagram and concise account of the business problem, architecture, model training and validation, deployment, optimization, your decisions and measurable results. The role calls for end-to-end AI/ML and GenAI delivery.

  • Practice an enterprise architecture exercise

    Sketch a hypothetical solution that turns a business challenge into an AI roadmap and scalable architecture. Explain when you would use an LLM, RAG, an agent or predictive analytics, and how APIs, microservices and cloud systems would support deployment; these are all named in the posting.

  • Prepare an MLOps operating plan

    Draft a sample lifecycle from validation through release and monitoring. Identify how you would track model performance, reliability, cost and drift, and what would trigger investigation or rollback.

  • Outline governance and quality controls

    Prepare a brief example of how you would address responsible AI, ethical and compliant use, coding standards and review practices. These are advertised responsibilities; present any proposed controls as your approach, not an existing iTCart process.

  • Rehearse a leadership and alignment example

    Structure one example around mentoring AI engineers, ML engineers or data scientists while aligning product, engineering and business stakeholders. Be ready to explain decisions, disagreements and outcomes without overstating your role.

  • Write questions for the Head of AI or AI Architect

    Ask which enterprise platforms or products need attention first, how AI roadmap decisions are made, what production reliability and cost measures matter, and where the team needs leadership support. The posting identifies this reporting line and these areas of responsibility.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 29, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 5 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…