New opportunity

Large Language Model Architect

Accenture · Ahmedabad, India

About this role

Accenture seeks a Large Language Model Architect in Ahmedabad to lead enterprise AI and LLM technology architecture, with a particular focus on Snowflake-native platforms. The role connects business priorities to technical roadmaps and owns cohesive, production-ready architecture across machine learning, generative AI, RAG, agentic systems, inference and enterprise integration.

Responsibilities

  • Advise CIOs, CTOs and other stakeholders on AI strategy; lead architecture assessments, target-state design, gap analysis, platform selection and implementation sequencing. Coordinate domain architects and resolve cross-domain design decisions.
  • Define Snowflake Cortex-based agent, RAG, document intelligence and analytics architectures, plus Snowpark and Streamlit reference patterns. Establish standards for access control, masking, lineage, monitoring, cost and data security in regulated workloads.
  • Architect model- and tool-agnostic multi-agent systems, including orchestration, memory, tool use, agent registries and AI gateway patterns. Define context layers using knowledge graphs, ontologies, vector search, semantic retrieval and conversation state.
  • Set security, privacy, governance, observability, performance and reliability controls. Establish evaluation practices for accuracy, relevance, groundedness, latency, cost and safety. Direct inference, model routing, adaptation, caching and deployment decisions; produce blueprints, architecture decision records, diagrams and governance playbooks.

Requirements

The posting states a minimum of 18 years of experience, while its role summary specifies 12+ years of overall experience; the header lists 12–14 years. It also specifies 8+ years designing enterprise AI, data, analytics or cloud-native solutions, 6+ years in relevant engineering disciplines, and two separate 2+ year requirements for LLM/generative AI architecture and production LLM application patterns. It requires 15 years of full-time education and a bachelor's degree or equivalent in a relevant technical discipline. Candidates need senior architecture experience in sectors such as banking, insurance, retail, healthcare, travel, logistics or telecom; hands-on Snowflake AI expertise; and the ability to communicate defensible architecture choices to executives and delivery teams.

Preferred

Snowflake certifications or further Snowflake platform exposure; dbt, Native Apps and cost tuning; frameworks and tools including LangChain, LangGraph, LlamaIndex, Haystack, Semantic Kernel, MLflow, FastAPI, Docker and Kubernetes; and experience in responsible AI, model risk, red-teaming, synthetic data, human-in-the-loop review, A/B testing or GenAI FinOps. Thought leadership through reusable assets, advisory work or community participation is also valued.

For full details about this role, click “Apply on company site” to view the employer’s original posting.

Skills for this role

Generative AILarge Language ModelsSnowflake Data WarehouseSnowflake Cortex AICortex AgentsCortex SearchCortex AnalystCortex AI FunctionsSnowparkStreamlitDynamic TablesSnowflake TasksSnowflake StreamsSnowflake MLRBACRAGAgentic AIPrompt EngineeringContext EngineeringEmbeddingsVector DatabasesSemantic RetrievalMulti-Agent OrchestrationModel EvaluationModel RoutingKnowledge GraphsOntologiesData SecurityAI GovernanceAI Observability

Your skill match

Checking your profile…

YOUR NEXT STEP

Get interview-ready for this role

A focused preparation guide, built around this job’s responsibilities and requirements.

✦ AI-generated guide
Preparation suggestions, not the employer’s actual interview questions. Always check the original posting for current requirements.
01

Understand the role

What matters most

  • Translate strategy into an enterprise AI roadmap

    The role partners with CIOs, CTOs and business leaders, then leads assessments, target-state design, gap analysis and implementation sequencing. Be ready to explain how business outcomes, risk constraints and delivery dependencies shape a phased roadmap.

  • Set Snowflake-native architecture standards

    The posting calls for Cortex-based agent, RAG, document intelligence and analytics architectures, Snowpark and Streamlit reference patterns, and standards for access control, masking, lineage, monitoring, cost and data security.

  • Own cohesive, production-ready AI design

    This architect aligns domain specialists across LLM applications, multi-agent orchestration, context layers, inference and enterprise integration. The role also owns blueprints, architecture decision records, integration patterns and governance playbooks.

  • Make AI quality and operational controls measurable

    The posting calls for evaluation and observability covering accuracy, relevance, groundedness, latency, cost, safety and reliability, alongside security, privacy, scalability and production-support standards.

Likely challenges to think through

  • Balance Snowflake-native design with portability

    A likely design tension is using Cortex and Snowflake governance deeply while keeping the specified multi-agent architecture model- and tool-agnostic. Prepare a decision framework for what belongs inside Snowflake, what needs an abstraction boundary, and how each choice affects governance and operational complexity.

  • Reconcile controls with inference speed and cost

    Regulated-workload protections and evaluation gates may compete with low-latency, high-throughput and cost targets. Prepare to walk through explicit non-functional targets and the trade-offs among model routing, caching, guardrails, monitoring and deployment patterns.

  • Resolve decisions across stakeholders and domains

    Aligning executives, security teams, domain architects and delivery teams may require choosing between competing priorities. Prepare an example approach to documenting options, evidence, ownership and sequencing in an architecture decision record rather than treating alignment as a purely technical decision.

03

Practice your answers

Technical practice

How would you turn an enterprise AI architecture assessment into a phased roadmap?

What to coverThe role includes target-state design, gap analysis, platform selection and implementation sequencing. Suggested preparation: explain how you would prioritize business outcomes, dependencies, risks and non-functional requirements when sequencing work.

How would you design a Snowflake-native RAG and document intelligence architecture?

What to coverThe posting names Cortex capabilities, Snowpark and Streamlit reference patterns for Snowflake-native AI. Suggested preparation: trace data ingestion, retrieval, application integration and governance boundaries, and explain where each named capability fits.

How would you govern a regulated AI workload on Snowflake?

What to coverThe role calls for RBAC, masking, lineage, access history, monitoring, cost controls and data security. Suggested preparation: explain how you would enforce authorization and PII protection while retaining auditability and usable data access.

How would you design a context layer for an enterprise LLM application?

What to coverThe posting specifies knowledge graphs, ontologies, vector search, semantic retrieval, prompt assembly and conversation state. Suggested preparation: compare when structured relationships versus retrieved passages improve context, and describe how you would check relevance and groundedness.

How would you keep a multi-agent architecture model- and tool-agnostic?

What to coverThe role covers orchestration, memory, tool use, an agent registry and AI gateway or control-plane patterns. Suggested preparation: describe service boundaries, tool authorization and agent certification gates, including how you would limit coupling and unsafe actions.

How would you evaluate and observe an LLM application in production?

What to coverThe posting calls for evaluation of accuracy, relevance, groundedness, latency, cost, safety and reliability. Suggested preparation: distinguish pre-release gates from production monitoring, and explain how findings would drive architecture changes.

How would you balance inference latency, throughput, quality and cost?

What to coverThe role includes model routing, caching, adaptation or fine-tuning, and production deployment decisions. Suggested preparation: compare these options against workload requirements and explain what measurements would justify a change.

How would you design for failure and recovery in an enterprise AI platform?

What to coverThe posting requires scalability, resiliency, operational readiness and production support metrics. Suggested preparation: walk through a plausible dependency failure, its effect on users, and the monitoring and recovery controls you would design.

How would you make a defensible platform or foundation-model recommendation?

What to coverThe role asks for evidence-based comparisons of platforms, frameworks, models and deployment patterns. Suggested preparation: explain evaluation criteria tied to business needs, governance, integration and non-functional requirements rather than assuming one option always wins.

What architecture artifacts would you produce to align delivery teams?

What to coverThe posting lists blueprints, architecture decision records, sequence diagrams, integration patterns and governance playbooks. Suggested preparation: explain which decisions each artifact should capture and how you would keep cross-domain implementation consistent.

Behavioural practice

Tell me about aligning executives and delivery teams on an AI roadmap.

What to coverThe role connects business priorities to technical roadmaps across senior and delivery stakeholders. Suggested preparation: use a real situation, your actions in translating competing priorities into decisions, and the resulting outcome.

Describe a cross-domain architecture disagreement you resolved.

What to coverThe posting calls for coordinating domain architects and resolving design decisions across an enterprise solution. Suggested preparation: give a real example covering the disagreement, your decision process and evidence, and the result.

Tell me about adapting an architecture to security or regulatory constraints.

What to coverThe role emphasizes regulated workloads, privacy, governance and domain-specific risk expectations. Suggested preparation: describe the situation, how you worked with relevant stakeholders on controls and trade-offs, and the outcome.

Describe a time evaluation or production evidence changed your technical direction.

What to coverThe posting emphasizes evaluation gates, observability and production support metrics. Suggested preparation: explain the initial decision, what evidence challenged it, what you changed and the result in a real example.

Tell me about creating a reusable architecture asset or decision framework.

What to coverThe role requires authoritative architecture artifacts and values reusable assets as thought leadership. Suggested preparation: give a real situation, your contribution to the asset, how others used it and the resulting impact.

02

Sharpen your knowledge

Topics to prepare

  • Enterprise AI architecture and sequencing

    Review how to move from a current-state assessment to a target architecture: for a hypothetical regulated workload, identify gaps, define non-functional requirements, and sequence platform decisions. The posting explicitly calls for assessments, roadmaps, cross-domain alignment, and executive-level trade-offs.

  • Snowflake-native AI architecture

    Map when Cortex Agents, Search, Analyst and AI Functions fit alongside Snowpark, Streamlit, Dynamic Tables, Tasks and Streams in a reference architecture. Explain the governance boundary and key trade-offs; the posting requires deep Snowflake architecture and hands-on expertise.

  • RAG and enterprise context design

    Compare vector search, semantic retrieval, knowledge graphs and ontologies for a document-based question-answering scenario. Trace how retrieved evidence becomes prompt context and conversation state. These are explicit components of the role’s context-layer architecture.

  • Multi-agent and inference decisions

    Sketch the responsibilities of orchestration, memory, tool authorization, an agent registry and an AI gateway; then justify routing, caching and latency choices. The posting calls for model- and tool-agnostic agents and production inference decisions.

  • AI governance and evaluation

    Review how RBAC, masking, PII protection, lineage, guardrails and auditability connect to evaluation gates. Draft measures for groundedness, relevance, safety, latency and cost; all are named architecture controls or evaluation dimensions in the posting.

Skills to revise

  • Build a Snowflake reference-pattern sketch

    Using a hypothetical regulated document workflow, draw data flow through Snowflake ingestion or processing, Cortex retrieval or analysis, and a Snowpark or Streamlit application; mark RBAC, masking, lineage and monitoring points. This rehearses the posting’s required Snowflake-native design work.

  • Produce architecture decision records

    Write two short ADRs comparing RAG retrieval options and model-routing or caching options. State assumptions, alternatives, non-functional impacts and the decision rationale. The posting explicitly asks for defensible trade-offs and authoritative architecture artifacts.

  • Design an evaluation and observability plan

    Create a small test matrix for an imagined RAG or agent workflow, with example checks for accuracy, groundedness, tool-use safety, latency and cost, plus a production monitoring response. The posting requires productized evaluation and observability practices.

  • Present a phased architecture recommendation

    Practice a brief executive explanation of business outcomes, risks and implementation phases, followed by a delivery-team walkthrough of dependencies and controls. This targets the role’s explicit stakeholder communication and roadmap responsibilities.

04

Your preparation checklist

  • Build a requirements evidence sheet

    The posting lists enterprise architecture, engineering, LLM architecture and production LLM application experience, plus education requirements. Prepare a dated, factual evidence table for each; note that its 18-year minimum conflicts with the 12+ year qualification and 12–14 year header.

  • Prepare an executive-level architecture walkthrough

    Choose a relevant enterprise AI example and prepare a short presentation showing the business objective, assessment, target state, gap analysis, phased roadmap and cross-domain decisions. Use a regulated-industry example if one is available.

  • Draft a Snowflake-native reference blueprint

    As a practice exercise, diagram a RAG or agent application using relevant Cortex capabilities, Snowpark and Streamlit. Label data flows, integration boundaries, RBAC, masking, lineage, monitoring and cost controls; distinguish hands-on experience from proposed design.

  • Work through a multi-agent design exercise

    Sketch orchestration, tool authorization, memory, an agent registry and an AI gateway, alongside retrieval and conversation-state choices. Prepare to explain when a simpler RAG design would be preferable.

  • Create an evaluation and operations plan

    Prepare a sample scorecard for accuracy, relevance, groundedness, latency, cost, safety and reliability. Pair it with proposed evaluation gates, observability, PII protection and production-support measures.

  • Write two defensible architecture decisions

    Draft brief ADRs comparing platform or model options and addressing trade-offs such as routing versus caching, or managed versus external components. Include assumptions, non-functional requirements, risks and the evidence that would change each decision.

  • Bring focused questions for the employer

    Ask which experience figure governs this role, which Snowflake-native workloads are the immediate priority, and how architecture ownership is divided among domain architects, security teams and delivery teams.

AI-generated from the job information · Prepared Sep 30, 2026 (UTC)Useful preparation, not a guarantee of eligibility or an offer.

Availability last checked: 5 Nov 2026. Status can change after a check; confirm on the employer’s website. Report an issue · Our checking policy

KEEP EXPLORING

Similar AI jobs

Related skills and specializations in India. Matched to this role, not your profile.

Explore more jobs
Finding similar opportunities…